Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey announces endorsement of Alito (Santorum Challenger in PA)
Associated Press ^ | January 24, 2006 | KIMBERLY HEFLING

Posted on 01/24/2006 8:19:40 PM PST by RWR8189

Sen. Rick Santorum's leading Democratic challenger, Pennsylvania Treasurer Bob Casey, announced Tuesday that he endorses Judge Samuel Alito's confirmation to the Supreme Court.

For weeks, Republicans have called Casey "Silent Bob" and pressed him to say whether he supports Alito's confirmation. Casey and Alito have a family connection because Alito, who serves on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based in Philadelphia, sided with Casey's father, the late Gov. Bob Casey, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The case challenged a state law requiring women seeking abortions to notify their spouses.

"I do not agree with everything that Judge Samuel Alito has done or said - particularly many of his rulings which too often result in corporate power prevailing over the interests of consumers and workers," Casey said in a statement. "However, I agree with The Philadelphia Inquirer and Washington Post editorial boards that the arguments against Judge Alito do not rise to the level that would require a vote denying him a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court."

Santorum's campaign manager responded with a statement accusing Casey of ducking the issue and then following the lead of Santorum, the No. 3 Senate Republican. Both candidates are generally against abortion. Santorum came out strong in support of Alito at a conservative rally Jan. 8.

Alito on Tuesday won narrow approval along strict party lines from the Senate Judiciary Committee, with all Republicans supporting him and the Democrats opposed. He still must be confirmed by the full Senate.

Larry Smar, a Casey spokesman, said the treasurer wanted time to examine Alito's background. The focus on Alito was an attempt by the Santorum campaign to distract from other issues, Smar said.

Casey's endorsement came shortly after Gov. Ed Rendell said Tuesday during a news conference in Washington that he reluctantly supports Alito's confirmation. Smar said the timing was a coincidence.

The Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision was overturned in 1992 by the Supreme Court, but justices did give states new powers to make it more difficult for women to end their pregnancies. Alito defended the ruling at his Senate confirmation hearing.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearing; alitovote; bobcasey; bobcaseyjr; casey; caseyjr; judealito; roe; samalito; santorum; scotus

1 posted on 01/24/2006 8:19:42 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Is this another rerun of Salazar and Casey will learn a lot quickly if he gets to the Senate?


2 posted on 01/24/2006 8:54:27 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

So Bob Casey cannot stand for anything till someone leads the way for him, eh?


3 posted on 01/24/2006 9:40:30 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Tribune7

Well look here, it has spoken.


4 posted on 01/24/2006 9:43:14 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

LOL .. yea I heard this on the radio earlier

This won't go over with the libs


5 posted on 01/24/2006 9:45:58 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I was just at the DUmp. They'll vote for him. Anyone but Santorum.


6 posted on 01/24/2006 9:49:21 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo; BlackElk
did give states new powers to make it more difficult for women to end their pregnancies.

Now, THERE's a euphemism. All pregnancies end . . . they are supposed to end in birth.
7 posted on 01/24/2006 10:58:14 PM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This is an easy call for a phony rat who's not in office. Saazar would probably have done the same.


8 posted on 01/25/2006 5:22:25 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Willie Green; Mo1; ..

I honestly think Santorum might pull it off. Casey is not a great candidate.


9 posted on 01/25/2006 7:56:01 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Rendell supports a conservative? Is this a misprint?
10 posted on 01/25/2006 9:11:37 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

No. Rendell is going to have a tough election.


11 posted on 01/25/2006 10:38:50 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Why, of course. Casey's opinion on this doesnt count unless he really votes, so this is a 'free' opinion. ... So he'll support Alito and oppose every other conservative who comes after ... moderate before the election, hard left after. What a way to screw the voters!


12 posted on 01/25/2006 3:33:53 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Is Rendell doing a "SWANN DIVE" in the polls?
I can only hope so! :-)


13 posted on 01/25/2006 3:34:59 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

LOL


14 posted on 01/25/2006 4:30:45 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

At least Casey says what he believes. Santorum could say one thing then the next minute totally contradict what he said before. He has no spine.


15 posted on 01/26/2006 5:55:34 AM PST by AdamWilliams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdamWilliams

What an absurd comment... Santorum is an awesome Senator with a heck of a lot more spine than most other Senators. It's *because* he says what he believes that the liberals hate him so much.

You comment is the opposite of reality, and your praise of liberal-in-moderate's-clothing Casey makes me wonder. the truth? ...

At least Santorum says what he believes. Casey could say one thing then the next minute totally contradict what he said before. He has no spine.


16 posted on 01/26/2006 11:04:01 AM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
At least Santorum says what he believes.

If he believes that sticking a bumper sticker on the car is the same as serving your country in the military, there's not a big enough boot to kick him out of office and replace him with somebody who actually knows what it means to serve your country (here's a hint, it's not sticking a 50-cent bumper sticker on your car).

Pennsylvania has a lot of good Republicans, I'm sure they can find somebody better than him.

A couple of people emailed me about a speech he gave a few days ago, and at first I thought they were kidding, and then somebody emailed me the video tonight.

I couldn't believe that he would have the gall to talk about the men and women in our military who are "willing to sacrifice their lives for this great country" and then turn around and say "What I'm asking all of you is not to put on a uniform, but put on a bumper sticker. Is that too much to ask? Is it that much to ask you to step up and serve your country?".

If I was running against him, I would just run that portion of his speech as my campaign ad. Pennsylvania has more than enough vets and currently serving troops to vote him out, and unfortunately he probably gave his office away to a democrat.
17 posted on 01/27/2006 10:27:53 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

what's your problem? Is asking people to rhetorically support the war asking too LITTLE or TOO MUCH?

I dont see how it is inappropriate at all. This is no different from similar statements Bush and other administration officials have made. In fact, if more Americans stood up and vocalized support for the war, it would be a wonderful thing for this country and a morale boost for our military!


18 posted on 01/28/2006 12:55:53 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

You must not have seen the video then.


19 posted on 01/28/2006 1:07:31 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Tribune7

I don't recall Rendell's endorsement of Alito being "reluctant" as AP reports. Rendell's wife is also a judge on the 3rd Circuit, who's served with Alito for years now .. and, presumably, was one of the seven 3rd Circ. judges who came to testify in support of Alito. And, yes, Lynn Swann, the Steeler Great, is running against Rendell, so he will have a tough race (Swann ahead in most recent polls).


20 posted on 01/28/2006 1:13:20 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson