Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada/US Border Shoot Out: Guards Run Away
CBC Canada ^ | 1/24/06

Posted on 01/24/2006 11:16:12 PM PST by llevrok

Shootout closes Peace Arch border crossing Last Updated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:47:40 EST CBC News

A police chase at the Canada-U.S. border forced the closure of the Peace Arch border crossing south of Vancouver on Tuesday.

It also caused dozens of Canadian guards to walk off the job, fearing for their safety.

The incident started when two men, both murder suspects, tried to get into Canada. Officials say the two men, 38-year-old Ishtiaq Hussain and 22-year-old Jose Antonio Barajas, are now in custody. They are wanted on murder charges in California.

But the arrest didn't come easy. One of the suspects was wounded in a shootout with police.

U.S. sheriffs say the pair managed to make it to the check point about a metre before Canadian soil.

"They [drove] through the border and they almost struck two uniformed officers," said Bill Elf, of the Whatcom County Sheriff's Department.

The suspects continued northbound and struck the Peace Arch itself at one point.

Witness Bill Whittle didn't see the ensuing gunfight but he heard it. "I heard about seven or eight gunshots on the other side of the Peace Arch," he said. "One of [the suspects] was shot. [The police] got him out of the car."

Officials credit a brave deputy sheriff for single-handedly stopping the pair, who were considered armed and dangerous.

CBC News has learned that when unarmed Canadian border guards found out the murder suspects were coming their way they left their posts at four crossings along the B.C. border. Only two supervisors were left at each crossing to protect the Canadian side.

A spokeswoman with Canada Border Services says the guards have the legal right to refuse to work if they believe they are in imminent danger.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bang; banglist; canada; canaduh; donutwatch; fraidycats; immigrantlist; ins; trop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-102 next last
Oh! Canada? Who stands on guard for thee ?
1 posted on 01/24/2006 11:16:14 PM PST by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: llevrok
38-year-old Ishtiaq Hussain and 22-year-old Jose Antonio Barajas

I wonder if they were legal. Hmm...
2 posted on 01/24/2006 11:18:41 PM PST by jamesm51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

In their defense, Canadian Customs officers have been trying to get firearms for many, many years. Everytime the work-place safety committee says they should, and then everytime idiots in Ottawa turn them down. Hopefully the new Conservative government will think more clearly on this subject.


3 posted on 01/24/2006 11:18:44 PM PST by Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Are there any men in Canada left with the equipment that makes one a male?


4 posted on 01/24/2006 11:19:11 PM PST by vrwc0915 ("Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

What's the matter, do they want to live forever? ...in Canada?


5 posted on 01/24/2006 11:20:54 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood

---In their defense, Canadian Customs officers have been trying to get firearms for many, many years. ---

No guns? That's insane!


6 posted on 01/24/2006 11:22:26 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vrwc0915
Let's be fair here. Would you stay at your post when there are two known, armed murderers heading your way and you have no weapons?

If you say yes, you're not brave...you're stupid.

L

7 posted on 01/24/2006 11:24:40 PM PST by Lurker (Liberal policies break hearts and destroy lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

In all fairness no, however I sure wouldn't take the job knowing I would not have the tools to do that job


8 posted on 01/24/2006 11:28:11 PM PST by vrwc0915 ("Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jamesm51
"I wonder if they were legal. Hmm..."

Well, if they had gotten into Canada, I'm sure they would have been generously treated as illegals, put on welfare, and given a place to live until they were ready to return to their profession in the States.

Seriously, if they were murder suspects, they are not deported to the U.S. from Canada unless promises are give that they will not suffer the death penalty - glad they didn't make it.
9 posted on 01/24/2006 11:30:06 PM PST by Herakles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Well..yeah. It is. The Liberal government was told on numerous occasions that the border was dangerous, and that the customs guys should be armed. They were willing to provide body armour, and collapsable batons, but nothing else. The reasons were, of course, stupid.

1. (This will make American Freepers furious!) The American Border service is already there, and are armed. The Americans can support our customs people if they hit the soup.

2. Well, we already have the RCMP. If there's a problem, we'll have them respond. The RCMP is sometimes 30kms or more away, and they aren't going to raise shot customs guys from the dead.

3. What sort of impression do we want to make on vistors to our friendly, open country? Not people with icky, *American-style* guns! Let's use this as a chance to stress how un-American we are to vistors (and save some bucks on training and equipment purchasing.)

These were also the people who made decisions about military purchasing and deployment. The rationele never changed, and as far as I'm concerned they have blood on their hands.


10 posted on 01/24/2006 11:30:34 PM PST by Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Let's be fair here. Would you stay at your post when there are two known, armed murderers heading your way and you have no weapons?

Agreed, we should be fair. It isn't the Canadian Custom officer's fault, the blame rests squarely on the previous regime in Ottowa. One would hope that the incoming Mr. Harper has been made aware of this, and takes the necessary measures...

the infowarrior

11 posted on 01/24/2006 11:31:37 PM PST by infowarrior (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I talked to a Candadian border guard once while crossing the border. She was a real spunky thing. She made me take off my sunglasses for no good reason.


12 posted on 01/24/2006 11:32:29 PM PST by carl in alaska (The democrats did not invent treason, but they invented the use of treason as a political strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamesm51
I wonder if they were legal.

At least you don't have to wonder about the religion of one of them.

13 posted on 01/24/2006 11:35:44 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vrwc0915
Neither would I. That just proves that neither you nor I are stupid.

L

14 posted on 01/24/2006 11:36:16 PM PST by Lurker (Liberal policies break hearts and destroy lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jamesm51
I wonder if they were legal. Hmm...

38-year-old Ishtiaq Hussain and 22-year-old Jose Antonio Barajas

Doubt it. I'm sitting here wondering about the "association" that the above names represent. Very interesting; and predicted.

15 posted on 01/24/2006 11:37:52 PM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
when unarmed Canadian border guards found out the murder suspects were coming their way they left their posts at four crossings along the B.C. border.

Unarmed? Thats not a guard, thats a Wal-Mart greeter.
16 posted on 01/24/2006 11:41:43 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Super Man wears Jack Bauer pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; gubamyster

Terrorist "suspects" struck the Peace Arch itself while roaring through the unarmed guards while fleeing into Canada from the United States. DC, we have a problem with our future Northern co-state.


17 posted on 01/24/2006 11:42:24 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus (Get new and improved 'Alien-B-Gone' ...pressure your Senators to pass the House Immigration Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
At least you don't have to wonder about the religion of one of them.

You're most likely right. It's likely Jose is Catholic.

18 posted on 01/24/2006 11:42:41 PM PST by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Welcome to the socialist utopia.


19 posted on 01/24/2006 11:44:01 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; gubamyster

No, they were coming FROM Canada. I can't get any further information from that source.

Terrorists from Canada? Surely not. All the best OBLs tell us it's impossible.


20 posted on 01/24/2006 11:47:59 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus (Get new and improved 'Alien-B-Gone' ...pressure your Senators to pass the House Immigration Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Antonello

A solution may be a armed guard crossing point in US territory a mile or so from the border.


21 posted on 01/24/2006 11:49:20 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

BINGO!


22 posted on 01/24/2006 11:50:27 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

This story proves several things:

1.) Canadian government is incompetent for disarming their border patrol.

2.) The Minutemen Project here in America has every single right to exist.

3.) Canadian officers ARE cowards for "running away." How does one get up in the morning knowing that he fled the scene as a cold blooded killer escapes to continue his mayhem elsewhere?

4.) If the MSM snubs this story, then it will further prove their bias against the American people. We the people have a right to know about potential terrorists coming into our nation while Canada essentially refuses to stop them.


23 posted on 01/24/2006 11:52:38 PM PST by Emmet Fitzhume ("Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vrwc0915
In all fairness no, however I sure wouldn't take the job knowing I would not have the tools to do that job

In all fairness, incidents like this are rare on the US/Canada border.

24 posted on 01/24/2006 11:52:52 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
"CBC News has learned that when unarmed Canadian border guards found out the murder suspects were coming their way they left their posts at four crossings along the B.C. border. Only two supervisors were left at each crossing to protect the Canadian side."

Why are the Canadian border guards unarmed?

And if they feel that being unarmed is OK, and they could still protect the border, why did they run away?
25 posted on 01/24/2006 11:56:48 PM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc0915

Get a grip.

American border guards are armed and Canadians aren't.

So what, there is only one highway leading north from the US border and there are three police forces within the first fifteen miles including the RCMP.

These idiots would have been stopped with one road block before they got five miles into Canada.

Canada customs staff are trained to detect contraband not take a bullet from two murder suspects FROM THE US making a run for the Canadian border who stand zero chance of making it across.


26 posted on 01/24/2006 11:57:51 PM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Emmet Fitzhume
3.) Canadian officers ARE cowards for "running away." How does one get up in the morning knowing that he fled the scene as a cold blooded killer escapes to continue his mayhem elsewhere?

Right, so Canadian border official told by their own government to give up their firearms and to guard the border without a firearm is a coward.

4.) If the MSM snubs this story, then it will further prove their bias against the American people. We the people have a right to know about potential terrorists coming into our nation while Canada essentially refuses to stop them.

Screw the media. I don't need the media to tell me that I need to protect myself. Your comment that "Canada essentially refuses to stop them" is disengenious at best, and a myth. It's not that they refuse to stop them, the immigration system in Canada is simply broken down, that's the reality. There are so many immigrants being processed in the Canadian customs that many are given hearings and most of the ones who have a criminal record don't bother to show up and just simply disappear into the crowd. It's not until incidents like this border incident that they suddenly pop up.

27 posted on 01/24/2006 11:59:45 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
"...38-year-old Ishtiaq Hussain and 22-year-old Jose Antonio Barajas..."

A criminal brew from south of the border and across the sea. From south of the border.

28 posted on 01/25/2006 12:00:58 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

"Let's be fair here. Would you stay at your post when there are two known, armed murderers heading your way and you have no weapons?"

I would have left the job when they told me I would be an unarmed cop to start with.

That is beyond stupid.


29 posted on 01/25/2006 12:02:03 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Whimps!!


30 posted on 01/25/2006 12:02:15 AM PST by Pro-Bush (We protect Korea's border better than our own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garandgal
Doubt it. I'm sitting here wondering about the "association" that the above names represent. Very interesting; and predicted.

Right, one came from Mexico and the other was obviously Islamic. Both trying to get into Canada illegally, and we're blaming the Canadian officials for being unarmed, when they clearly went undetected in our own country.

31 posted on 01/25/2006 12:04:44 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska


I was detained and 'interrogated' as to why I had a NRA sticker on a side window of my vehicle.


32 posted on 01/25/2006 12:06:44 AM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

"Right, so Canadian border official told by their own government to give up their firearms and to guard the border without a firearm is a coward."

Potato, potato. Safeguarding one's nation is clearly important so long as no one threatens me or the citizens I am sworn to protect, right? If I were one of the guards, I would have stayed at my post.

4.) If the MSM snubs this story, then it will further prove their bias against the American people. We the people have a right to know about potential terrorists coming into our nation while Canada essentially refuses to stop them.

"It's not that they refuse to stop them, the immigration system in Canada is simply broken down, that's the reality."

Thanks, I will sleep better tonight knowing that.


33 posted on 01/25/2006 12:07:10 AM PST by Emmet Fitzhume ("Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
No, they were coming FROM Canada. I can't get any further information from that source.

If you bothered to read the article you might have read this:

The incident started when two men, both murder suspects, tried to get into Canada.

34 posted on 01/25/2006 12:10:39 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

This can be one of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's first initiatives, put firearms into the hands of Canadian Customs officers protecting the border and make it clear that *criminals* who attempt to force their way in, by crashing, speeding, shooting, etc., will be fired upon, and if maimed or killed, are responsible for their own criminal actions. The Chretien/Martin 12 year LIEberal regime has been slain, this is a great way to drive the point home.


35 posted on 01/25/2006 12:12:22 AM PST by mkjessup (Remember the good ol' days when giving aid and comfort to the enemy was rewarded with a noose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmet Fitzhume

There is a reason the liberals want to disarm....

Think about it.


36 posted on 01/25/2006 12:12:41 AM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Emmet Fitzhume
Potato, potato. Safeguarding one's nation is clearly important so long as no one threatens me or the citizens I am sworn to protect, right? If I were one of the guards, I would have stayed at my post.

If you were unarmed, your shorts would probably have to catch the next bus out of town as you left. On the other hand, if you stayed at your post unarmed, you deserved to be shot at.

37 posted on 01/25/2006 12:13:01 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Canada Border Services says the guards have the legal right to refuse to work if they believe they are in imminent danger.

Now that's a helpful philosophy for the unarmed citizens of Canada who will inherit the threat that the border guards run away from.

38 posted on 01/25/2006 12:13:13 AM PST by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamesm51

They were just trying to deport themselves.


39 posted on 01/25/2006 12:13:33 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
These were also the people who made decisions about military purchasing and deployment. The rationele never changed, and as far as I'm concerned they have blood on their hands.

Maybe they actually purchased guns for the guards from surplus British stocks, but on the voyage over.....

40 posted on 01/25/2006 12:14:05 AM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MillerCreek
A criminal brew from south of the border and across the sea. From south of the border.

Wanted for murder in California. If my geography is correct, California is in the US and not Canada.

41 posted on 01/25/2006 12:15:47 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Threepwood
Hopefully the new Conservative government will think more clearly on this subject.

I can't think of a better example for the new government to cite when deciding to arm the guards.

Are you SURE the Tories aren't paying Carl Rove a consulting fee?

42 posted on 01/25/2006 12:17:20 AM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Disgusting.


43 posted on 01/25/2006 12:18:41 AM PST by Dallas59 ((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

"If you were unarmed, your shorts would probably have to catch the next bus out of town as you left. On the other hand, if you stayed at your post unarmed, you deserved to be shot at."

You make this ugly with your personal attacks, which are both unnecessary and childish.

You have indicated that had you been in that particular position, you would have fled your post.

Some people find behavior like this to be cowardly.

I am a member of the US military, sworn to defend the society that I live in.

I could never live with myself if I fled from an opportunity to stop someone who has intentions of creating mayhem among the very citizens I am sworn to protect.

You clearly have no problem with running away.

This is where we differ, so keep your personal attacks to yourself, please.

John 10:11
John 15:13


44 posted on 01/25/2006 12:21:26 AM PST by Emmet Fitzhume ("Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever

If Canada feels more secure knowing that the American guards are armed, and they would handle things if need be, why not trust your own guards to be armed also ?

I'm not bashing the Canadian guards, but that thinking makes no sense to me.


45 posted on 01/25/2006 12:23:29 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Emmet Fitzhume
You make this ugly with your personal attacks, which are both unnecessary and childish.

Frankly, I don't give a rip if reality bothers you.

You clearly have no problem with running away.

On the contrary. You have a problem with reality. If I was told I was going to guard a post unarmed, I wouldn't take the job. I'd be looking for some other line of work.

46 posted on 01/25/2006 12:25:50 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
A spokeswoman with Canada Border Services says the guards have the legal right to refuse to work if they believe they are in imminent danger.

Guess I'm just dense or something. I always thought a guard was supposed to guard you and not run away. Oh well, maybe the new government will go back and correct a few definitions in the Standard Canadian Dictionary and bring it more in line with Webster's.

Nam Vet

47 posted on 01/25/2006 12:27:33 AM PST by Nam Vet (The Democrat Party of America is perfectly P.C. * .(* P.C. = Patriotically Challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

"I'd be looking for some other line of work."

Just stay out of the US Army, and I will be happy for the rest of my life.


48 posted on 01/25/2006 12:30:19 AM PST by Emmet Fitzhume ("Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Right, one came from Mexico and the other was obviously Islamic. Both trying to get into Canada illegally, and we're blaming the Canadian officials for being unarmed, when they clearly went undetected in our own country.

Not to mention a couple of people trying to flee via the NORTHERN border. Do we dare assume that Mexico is actually watching for Islamists attempting to go back south?

And the ages are odd...a thirty-eight year old? Some sort of leader? Many have predicted and warned that gangs would be merging with terrorists...

49 posted on 01/25/2006 12:31:02 AM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Look if you enter Canada on the I5 there are no exits for many miles.

Even if American guards were not armed there would be nowhere these two idiots could go without facing a roadblock they couldn't escape.

The fact is the BC/Washington border is the most peaceful border crossing in the world. Two psycho murder suspects from California do not change that fact.


50 posted on 01/25/2006 12:34:02 AM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson