Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The world social forum: The sad leftist path
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | 1/25/2006 | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Editorial

Posted on 01/25/2006 5:55:57 AM PST by serendepitylives

The world social forum: The sad leftist path

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

The World Social Forum is an aggregate of leftists joining to condemn President Bush in Caracas, Venezuela, this week. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is leading the event. The pleasures of denouncing and hearing others denounce the United States are a chief attraction.

"The U.S. government, especially under the Bush administration, has been trying to force its own economic policies on developing countries, and I think all of us here agree that must stop," said Jeff Monahan, 32, an organic farmer from Michigan.

Mr. Monahan, launching into empty-headed rhetoric is not how one builds wealth.

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: belafonte; bush; chavez; cindysheehan; left; venezuala

1 posted on 01/25/2006 5:55:59 AM PST by serendepitylives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: serendepitylives
This quote rings true:

"Free-market policies and a rule of law that protects private property have produced in parts of the world economic development barely imaginable a century ago. Nations that have failed to practice these principles will not prosper and have none but themselves to blame."

The problem in Latin American has been that only a few countries have established an environment where the rule of law prevails with minimal corruption. Mexico has made advances in opening up its economy to NAFTA, and the PRI is no longer in power, and that has helped Mexico, but they have far to go. Chile is the best example where the rule of law and free enterprise has prevailed.
2 posted on 01/25/2006 6:23:22 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: serendepitylives
If a fellow or nation is wealthy, and certain fundamentals are proved to be the cause of that wealth, a SANE person tries to emulate that success. If you only want power, then you follow a path which leads to poverty, and therefore the subjugation of the people to your iron will. This has and is the ongoing pattern. When will the people learn this?
3 posted on 01/25/2006 6:38:54 AM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: serendepitylives
"The U.S. government, especially under the Bush administration, has been trying to force its own economic policies on developing countries, and I think all of us here agree that must stop," said Jeff Monahan, 32, an organic farmer from Michigan.

Heaven forbid you follow a model that has led the US to become the most prosperous nation in the world.

4 posted on 01/25/2006 6:47:28 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner
If a fellow or nation is wealthy, and certain fundamentals are proved to be the cause of that wealth, a SANE person tries to emulate that success. If you only want power, then you follow a path which leads to poverty, and therefore the subjugation of the people to your iron will. This has and is the ongoing pattern. When will the people learn this?

Probably the same day that the people of Massachusetts stop sending JFnK and the Cape Cod Orca back to the Senate every 6 years.

5 posted on 01/25/2006 6:53:35 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Funny, it seems that most "free traders" were left off the invite list. [chuckle]


6 posted on 01/25/2006 6:57:28 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Knowing that this is the sort of guy that runs an "organic" farm is part of the reason I never buy "organic" produce.

I add the quotes because I've not yet been able to find "inorganic" produce :)


7 posted on 01/25/2006 6:57:46 AM PST by leoncaruthers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; hedgetrimmer

I wonder if hedgetrimmer is enjoying herself there?


8 posted on 01/25/2006 7:09:20 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: leoncaruthers

The label "organic" simply means they can charge twice as much for the same produce. It's a marketing ploy and nothing more.


9 posted on 01/25/2006 7:17:49 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Heaven forbid you follow a model that has led the US to become the most prosperous nation in the world.

The model the "free traders" are forcing, isn't what made us prosperous. The WTO didn't exist until 1994, claiming that the "free trade" mulitlateral system it is pushing somehow made America's wealth is just wrong.
10 posted on 01/25/2006 7:28:09 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I beg to differ. I am an organic farmer. This movement is growing exponentially. People want to know how their food is grown and what herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers have been used to grow it. I use no chemicals on my produce. And people are willing to pay a premium for that.


11 posted on 01/25/2006 7:34:36 AM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The Socialists in question here are decrying Capitalism not the WTO. This their main arguement. They have no real, morals based objection to war. They object to the success of Capitalism and wish to subvert it at any and all opportunities. It is a rival economic system and they can't compete with it so, they must bring it down by any means possible. The war is merely a target of opportunity. Capitalism made us great and they hate that.
12 posted on 01/25/2006 7:39:52 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

The word 'capitalism' didn't even enter the lexicon until the late 19th century when William Makepeace Thackery put it in one of his novels. How did it make American great?

On the other hand 'freedom', 'individual rights', 'liberty','property' were all in the lexicon of our founders. Go figure.


13 posted on 01/25/2006 7:48:38 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The WTO didn't exist until 1994, claiming that the "free trade" mulitlateral system it is pushing somehow made America's wealth is just wrong.

Household net worth 1994: $24.7 trillion
Household net worth 2005: $51.1 trillion

Our wealth has more than doubled since 1994. Yeah sure, all that free trading has been a real disaster for America's wealth. ROFL!

14 posted on 01/25/2006 7:53:22 AM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: serendepitylives

There is no desperate situation that Marxism will not make a lot worse.


15 posted on 01/25/2006 7:55:53 AM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mase
Our wealth has been more than doubled inflated since 1994.
16 posted on 01/25/2006 8:01:25 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: serendepitylives
It is so sad that much of Latin America is following the surest path to human misery.


17 posted on 01/25/2006 8:06:14 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
...inflated since 1994

The facts just keep getting in the way of your meaningless rants, don't they?

Maybe you can explain to us exactly how our assets have been "inflated" to more than twice their value since 1994. Please back up your work with links to reputable sources and, in the process, try not to confuse $2.74 billion with $10 billion.

18 posted on 01/25/2006 8:26:31 AM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: serendepitylives

bump


19 posted on 01/25/2006 8:29:29 AM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson