Skip to comments.
Iran hits back at veiled Israeli threats of attack (Will put Israel in "eternal coma like Sharon")
Middle East Online ^
| 1/25/2006
Posted on 01/25/2006 9:09:53 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Ciexyz
He has an Al Qaeda trick up his sleeve.
21
posted on
01/25/2006 10:50:07 AM PST
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: river rat
Better to kick their freaking ass, and their hearts and minds will follow. You're SO insensitive. :-)
22
posted on
01/25/2006 10:52:12 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
To: montyspython
I don't believe in coincidences. That's all I'm going to say about this whole matter.
23
posted on
01/25/2006 10:53:43 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
To: RichInOC
someone set him up the bomb..
24
posted on
01/25/2006 11:04:40 AM PST
by
rahbert
To: Ciexyz
When has there been a leader indulging in such irresponsible and dangerous rhetoric, as this nut in Iran.Here's my short list:
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Harry Reid
John F Kerry
Ted "Swimmer" Kennedy
Al Gore
25
posted on
01/25/2006 11:08:53 AM PST
by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: Rutles4Ever
Doesn't have the imagery of driving Israel into the sea. Iran may be running out of metaphor.
26
posted on
01/25/2006 11:11:17 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: Rutles4Ever
Iran, a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, says its nuclear programme is legal under the NPT and merely designed to meet its energy needs. Here they are, sitting on a sea of oil, and telling the world they need nuclear power ... we need a break.
27
posted on
01/25/2006 11:29:53 AM PST
by
bimbo
To: Ciexyz
Au Contraire!.....
I am a large (6'2", 240 pound) sensitive, pushover of a teddy-bear to my grandchildren -- and would like to leave them a world to grow up in as a safe and free American....
Semper Fi
28
posted on
01/25/2006 11:48:19 AM PST
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Today, George Bush refuses to be upfront with the American people by refusing to name the Russians as the reason why we have this problem in the first place. That's because the President looked into Putin's soul and found someone he could work with.
He was had.
To: RichInOC
To: binkdeville
31
posted on
01/25/2006 1:02:08 PM PST
by
RichInOC
(IN A.D. 2006...LAUGH WAS BEGINNING.)
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
It's not quite that simple. If Russia had not supplied the reactor to Iran, then China or Pakistan probably would have built the reactor for them. I doubt that Russia wants a nuclear-armed Iran either, so there is much more going on here than meets the eye.
32
posted on
01/25/2006 1:15:59 PM PST
by
carl in alaska
(The democrats did not invent treason, but they invented the use of treason as a political strategy.)
To: Ciexyz
When has there been a leader indulging in such irresponsible and dangerous rhetoric, as this nut in Iran?The last clear example was a European named Schickelgruber...
the infowarrior
33
posted on
01/25/2006 3:31:12 PM PST
by
infowarrior
(TANSTAAFL)
To: Rutles4Ever
Is Baghdad Bob employed by Iran nowadays?
34
posted on
01/25/2006 3:59:15 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie because he didn't bake one.)
To: carl in alaska; Personal Responsibility; US_MilitaryRules
If Russia had not supplied the reactor to Iran, then China or Pakistan probably would have built the reactor for them. Actually, Pakistan (nuke technology from Abdul Qadeer Khan) and China (through their proxy client North Korea missile components) have played major roles in making Iran nuke capable; however, it is the Russians who have been the major player here and the analogy to the 1962 Cubam Missile Crisis is quite striking. The threat to America and Israel from Iran's nukes is as great or greater than what Castro's threat was in 1962. Why? The Soviets controlled Castro and had full control over the nukes. Russia will not have that kind of control over Iran's nukes--little to none.
I state that the threat is greater from Iran today (near future) than it was from Cuba/Castro in 1962 for this reason.
Khruschev was edgy but he was not a madman like Iran's whacko is.
The common thread is the Russians today in Iran and with Cuba in 1962. The difference is unlike JFK, Bush will not be upfront with the Americans about Russia's role as JFK was about the Soviets' role.
35
posted on
01/25/2006 4:37:47 PM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: Rutles4Ever
Bring it on, Ahmadnutjob. Purim is coming.
36
posted on
01/25/2006 4:38:58 PM PST
by
Alouette
(Learned Mother of Zion)
To: MARKUSPRIME
China's day isn't coming for at least a decade. Iran's day is only months away, if not weeks.
37
posted on
01/25/2006 5:58:24 PM PST
by
tlj18
(May Ariel Sharon arise again to lead Israel over its enemies... Thy will be done.)
To: GreyFriar
How close are we to seeing Jesse Jackson speaking to us from Tehran, do you suppose?
38
posted on
01/25/2006 6:00:37 PM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
To: DoNotDivide
39
posted on
01/25/2006 6:08:19 PM PST
by
GreyFriar
((3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead))
To: GreyFriar
I figured mid-March, so that's about right.
40
posted on
01/25/2006 6:10:01 PM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson