Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support for Abortion in Sharp Decline [Zogby : 52% favor abortion, down from 68% a decade ago]
Zogby.com ^ | Jan 23, 2006 | Zogby Poll

Posted on 01/25/2006 9:37:14 AM PST by summer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-216 next last
To: Mr Ramsbotham

Absolutely. They have 3-D imaging now that really defines the baby's features.


21 posted on 01/25/2006 9:55:08 AM PST by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
It doesn't help the pro-abortion forces that pregnant women can now get a full-color, high-definition movie of their ultrasound. When you see something like that, there's no doubt about what you're seeing.

That's one of life's great ironies.

It was science which so many religious fundamentalist hate so much that has actually turn the tide in the abortion debate.

22 posted on 01/25/2006 9:55:48 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
Don't forget, this is Zogby. I'll bet the percentage of those who favor abortion is really lower

Correctomundo. It is probably 40% favor abortion. This man lies by distortion just as was done by the idiots on sexual deviancy.

23 posted on 01/25/2006 9:56:19 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

"It doesn't help the pro-abortion forces that pregnant women can now get a full-color, high-definition movie of their ultrasound. When you see something like that, there's no doubt about what you're seeing."

Last week at lunch, a young {20 something}, pregnant barmaid and I talked about her condition {7.5 months}. She told me {unsolicited} that she has color pictures of her coming baby. She then said, " I don't know how anyone can live with themselves if they have had an abortion"? She then showed me and my pal some pix of her about to be born, baby. There is no way that anyone can dispute what you are viewing, and it's not just a blob of tissue. The more young women see what they are carrying, the harder it will be for them to choose death for their baby.


24 posted on 01/25/2006 9:57:18 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Something else the democrats have done that have aided the right-to-life efforts unintentionally: They have placed pregnancy out of wedlock and single-parenting into a totally acceptable place in our society. Hence more pregnant teens and single women with unplanned pregnancies are keeping their children with little or no stigma.


25 posted on 01/25/2006 9:58:09 AM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

It is a horrible circle that can happen from this setup. Abortion rights people get enough votes to make it legal, and they then kill off enough of their offspring to become a minority. Right to life supporters raise enough children to outlaw it, more pro-choice babies are allowed to be born instead of being killed, they grow up and vote to kill their offspring again. Pretty sick circle of life.


26 posted on 01/25/2006 10:01:36 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: summer; 4lifeandliberty; AbsoluteGrace; afraidfortherepublic; Alamo-Girl; AlbionGirl; ...

Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...

27 posted on 01/25/2006 10:02:05 AM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Abortion Deaths vs. War Deaths
28 posted on 01/25/2006 10:02:55 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The RATS keep killing off their future voters.

Yep. Demographics really is destiny.

29 posted on 01/25/2006 10:04:11 AM PST by nina0113 (We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
>>The huge influx of Hispanic people over that time might play a factor in this poll.<<

I have said in the past that the open southern borders would sway the abortion debate. I think you are right but it's a bit like having someone hit you in the head with a baseball bat to stop a headache.

Muleteam1

30 posted on 01/25/2006 10:05:05 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: summer

Notice how anyone favoring restrictions is counted as opposing.......


31 posted on 01/25/2006 10:05:30 AM PST by phatoldphart (pessimist - an optimist with experience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga

Going to get ours tomorrow night. I cannot wait!!!


32 posted on 01/25/2006 10:10:49 AM PST by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: summer

I'd be curious to know how much the 'morning after' pill has influenced these numbers, and a breakdown of how many consider RU-486 to be an abortion in the same moral sense as the clinical procedure.


33 posted on 01/25/2006 10:12:24 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

I would think everyone would consider RU-486 to be the equivalent of a surgical abortion, since it can be done eight weeks into pregnancy. What I simply can't understand is why some people consider the morning-after pill, a higher concentration of the regular birth control pill, to be as morally objectionable as abortion, when it prevents the need for abortion.

And what I REALLY can't understand is people who have strong opinions about the morning after pill and RU-486, but use the terms interchangeably because they can't tell the difference between the two.


34 posted on 01/25/2006 10:20:09 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
Re your post #25 -- Yes, but the looming question on that front remains the financial difficulties of single women keeping their babies, as usually a one-parent household is not as welathy as Murphy Brown, and most of these kids will be growing up in poverty. I think the points raised by the kids quoted in my post #17 foreshadows a problem for conservatives, in that what kind of new support networks are you willing to support for all these babies that will now be born into poverty if abortion becomes illegal? I don't ask that to cause a flamewar, but only to mention that "no stigma" is not really the case, since poverty is seen by many as a stigma.

What I'd like to also know is this: I don't understand why it is so difficult to adopt in this country. You always hear horror stories about people waiting years and years to adopt, so instead they fly off to some foreign country and come home with a baby. If abortion becomes illegal, something has to change in terms of adoption procedures or something in this country.
35 posted on 01/25/2006 10:20:26 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: summer

welathy = wealthy


36 posted on 01/25/2006 10:21:26 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

It strikes me that the only people that are in favor of abortion are alive.


37 posted on 01/25/2006 10:21:49 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("We don't need POLITICIANS...we need STATESMEN.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

I meant to say: the kids quoted in my post #13


38 posted on 01/25/2006 10:24:17 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: summer
I think partial credit can go to the beautiful Serrin Foster of Feminists for Life.

(Before anyone jumps on me for bringing "feminism" to the thread let me say that S.C Chief Justice John Roberts' wife, Jane, is a member and former board member. The word feminism here is just a stealth tool.)

Starting over 10 years ago she began speaking at college campuses all over the country with her "pro-woman, pro-life" message. She continues her mission today. After learning that most young people enter college either pro-life or neutral on the position and leave as abortion proponents, FFL decided to target campuses.

Serrin is a remarkable speaker; charming, witty and unifying rather than alienating. I've seen her change people's minds in 40 minutes flat.
39 posted on 01/25/2006 10:25:32 AM PST by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma
College is also the time when many young women do have an unplanned pregnancy and abortion. She was smart to target that audience.

But where are the pro-choice/pro-abortion/whatever people these days? They seem to have been almost muffled by their own party.
40 posted on 01/25/2006 10:27:36 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson