Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Sees Progress in Military Prayer Issue
The Christian Post ^ | 25 Jan 06 | Francis Helguero

Posted on 01/26/2006 4:21:42 PM PST by xzins

Congressman Sees Progress in Military Prayer Issue

Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2006 Posted: 9:18:27AM EST

The lawmaker leading a congressional drive against Air Force guidelines encouraging non-sectarian prayers in certain situations is confident that the White House is looking into the matter, according to the legislator’s spokeswoman. Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) discussed the contested military policy last Thursday with President Bush’s Domestic Policy Advisor Claude Allen, and was confident that the matter would receive more attention within the Bush administration.

“The Congressman was very pleased, because he felt that [Allen] had a good grasp of the issue,” said spokeswoman Kathleen Joyce.

The controversy over military prayer policies stem from larger changes introduced in Air Force policies issued in August, recommending that commanders be more sensitive about discussing faith with subordinates.

On the issue of prayer, the guidelines encouraged “a brief non-sectarian prayer” in events of “special importance.” The guidelines also urged that “public prayer should not usually be included in official settings” such as staff meetings, classes and sports events.

The “Interim Guidelines Concerning Free Exercise of Religion in the Air Force” were introduced after an official review of allegations that evangelical Christian commanders and upperclassmen cadets pressured others regarding faith at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo.

Lawsuits concerning alleged abuses have been filed.

Some evangelical groups objected specifically to the “non-sectarian” prayer guidelines. Many maintain that it is necessary for Christian chaplains to specifically pray “in Jesus’ name” in any situation where a prayer is made.

Over 70 Washington lawmakers led by Jones signed a petition in October decrying the guidelines about non-sectarian prayer as a euphemism for prayer censorship. The argument made by the legislators for the Executive Order is for religious freedom to be accorded to chaplains to pray according to their faith regardless of what it may be.

Since the guidelines were introduced, conservative Christian groups have shown support for the request, citing the First Amendment right to free expression and accommodation of religion.

In early January, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) announced that over 200,000 people had added their names to a petition campaign which started after the guidelines were introduced, urging the president to issue and Executive Order. ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow said it was “pressure inside the military to censor chaplains and prevent them from praying according to their faith.”

The law center has been working together with Rep. Jones to promote awareness of the matter.

The issue of military restrictions on prayer also received attention recently when Navy Chaplain James Klingenschmitt went on a 19-day fast which ended on Jan. 7 after alleging that the Navy had ordered him that not to pray in public using Jesus’ name while wearing his uniform. He ended his fast on Jan. 7 after he says he had been given approval to pray by the Navy.

A navy spokeswoman said that the military branch’s policy does not require restrictions on prayer but rather suggests that chaplains be inclusive of other faiths in pluralistic situations.

Francis Helguero francis@christianpost.com


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclj; atheismandstate; chaplain; establishment; freeexpression; military; prayer
ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow said it was “pressure inside the military to censor chaplains and prevent them from praying according to their faith.”

Excellent summary of the issue by Sekulow. The issue is that these chaplains are being told how to pray when they are put into a non-worship public setting.

First, do not put them into the situation where this is a problem, and second, if they must be put in such a situation, then accept their religious identity without complaint.

Since there is never any necessity to put chaplains in such a situation, then this should be easy to solve.

1 posted on 01/26/2006 4:21:45 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson