Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Asthmatics Beware: The Government May Ban Your Inhaler
Center for Individual Freedom ^ | January 26, 2006 | CFIF

Posted on 01/27/2006 3:07:55 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Eco-terrorists have struck again. Not in the dead of night, to be pursued by diligent agents of the FBI, but right out in the open, in a public meeting, under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

On January 24, one of those ubiquitous FDA panels of "outside experts" voted, by an 11 to seven margin, to recommend that FDA ban non-prescription, over-the-counter asthma inhalers, used routinely by millions of asthma-sufferers to control the symptoms of their debilitating condition. As frequently noted in the press, while such recommendations are not binding, they are most often adopted.

The issue for the panel is not drug safety. It is not drug efficacy. It is the environment.

The inhalers proposed for extinction are used to treat mild to moderate asthma attacks by opening air passages. They work by propelling a measured dose of the drug epinephrine (or another bronchodilator) into the lungs. Unfortunately, the propellant is made up of chlorofluorocarbons, the dreaded CFCs.

Based on the scientific belief that CFCs released into the atmosphere are responsible for ozone layer depletion, they were first banned in consumer aerosol products by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1978. Then, in 1987, the so-called "Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer" sought to phase out CFCs on a worldwide basis. Described, as you might expect, as one of those "landmark" international agreements, the Montreal Protocol has now been signed by more than 180 countries. Subsequently, the U.S. banned all uses of CFCs as of 1996, except for certain "essential" products - medicines such as asthma inhalers.

Even the EPA, which, typically, has been pushing to extend the ban to asthma inhalers for years now, has estimated that inhaler-produced atmospheric CFC emissions is fractional - no more than 1.5 percent of the total. While easily accessible data are scant, we have seen one significantly lower estimate, and it is exceptionally difficult to believe that the tiny puffs inhaled by asthmatics produce CFC exhale of sufficient volume to present a real-world (i.e., not some hypothetical computer-modeled) effect. If such conclusive data, along with transparent methodology by which derived, exist, we'd like to take a look.

Even accepting the most horrific CFC scenarios, we are not talking about 50 million women lacquering big hair with hairspray several times daily or the other consequential uses for CFCs now gone missing except in countries that take a more cavalier (or pragmatic) view of "landmark" international environmental agreements than does the U.S.

We are talking about a medicine that is "essential" to those who use it. Today, the most prominent of the inhalers that would be banned is Primatene Mist, manufactured by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, which estimates 3 million American users.

Yes, there are alternatives, including powder formulations that may be sucked into the lungs without propellants and other aerosols that use recently developed propellants currently not deemed to present environmental problems. But the alternatives are not available without prescription and thus are more expensive, once again posing cost and availability issues for the so-called "little guy," to whose interests some liberal elected officials have recently expressed their undying devotion.

As we understand the Montreal Protocol, it does not absolutely, unequivocally, mandate the ban of CFC products if use is deemed essential and for which there are not available viable alternatives. Wyeth says it needs until 2009 or 2010 to have a substitute, which itself must be approved by the FDA, for over-the-counter use.

If you are an asthmatic, or have an asthmatic in your family, who depends on an over-the-counter inhaler, you might want to call your congressperson. Soon. See how much he or she cares about the "little guy."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asthma; asthmatics; cfcs; econuts; envirowackos; enviroweenies; fda; greens; greentyranny; health; healthypeople2010; inhalers; medicine; ngo; ngos; o3; ozone; uva; uvb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-103 next last
I rarely have time to post these days, but this oncoming tragedy just burns my butt! To have these arrogant assholes recommend banning these poor-man's inhalers when we have sunscreen to compensate for the little bit of added uv that results is the height of social irresponsibility! The CFC bans have probably negatively hurt developing countries, but I think that overall, they were worth it. However, THIS crap is going too far!
1 posted on 01/27/2006 3:07:58 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; ...
PING! This recommendation is unconscionable. These delusional nutcases need to read State of Fear before they have anything more to do with the regulatory process.
2 posted on 01/27/2006 3:11:28 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Jack Murtha: America's best-known EX-marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

No inhalers, no sudafed and coming soon no asprin.


3 posted on 01/27/2006 3:15:12 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I gots me birch trees and me aspin trees, and a pot of hot boirlin' water.
4 posted on 01/27/2006 3:16:22 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


5 posted on 01/27/2006 3:17:10 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They wish to ban an over the counter product in favor of a much more expensive prescription-only product. Sure sounds like some of the healthcare monstrosity that Hillary has been working for since she was President a decade ago.


6 posted on 01/27/2006 3:18:33 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I wholeheartedly agree with you on this. It's absolute stupidity on the part of regulating agencies.

Wyeth says it needs until 2009 or 2010 to have a substitute, which itself must be approved by the FDA, for over-the-counter use.

Duh, Wyeth, have you ever heard of Albuterol?

7 posted on 01/27/2006 3:19:00 PM PST by Sarajevo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

My husband has Asthma and -- thank goodness -- we control it with Singulair and homeopathics, but during monsoon season he does have to use the occasional inhaler and these people evidentally don't understand that asthma is a life-threatening disease and people -- children included -- die from asthma attacks.


8 posted on 01/27/2006 3:22:03 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
They wish to ban an over the counter product in favor of a much
more expensive prescription-only product.


This is a win-win-win for some environmentalist.
1. Tbey can feel great that they've "saved the earth"
2. They will really be helping the earth if some asthmatics
just die and reduce the demands on the resources of Mother Earth
3. And their trust-fund portfolio will go up as their Big Pharma
stocks benefit...
9 posted on 01/27/2006 3:22:18 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

I haven't seen the request for them to review over the counter inhalers so I don't know the question they were asked. I question if it is the responsibility of the FDA advisory panel to judge CFCs. Where does FDA get statuatory authority to ban a product because of CFCs?


10 posted on 01/27/2006 3:24:02 PM PST by AZFolks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I don't agree with banning aerosol epinepherine, but to be fair, albuterol is generic, and not terribly expensive.

What annoyed me was that they banned the aerosol Serevent, and it was replaced with that awful powder version.

At least the HFA replacement for the old Flovent is not so bad.


11 posted on 01/27/2006 3:25:09 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

If someone has severe enough asthma for it to be life-threatening, they shouldn't be using OTC inhalers anyways. It's a lousy way to control moderate or severe asthma.


12 posted on 01/27/2006 3:26:58 PM PST by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The "Hole" in the ozone layer is a natural occurrence due to the earths magnetic field ionizing ozone on the earths magnetic poles. The "Hole" did not just appear but was discovered when satellites became sensitive enough to detect it. So this "Hole" has been there for billions of years, and humans have nothing to do with it. Also remember that ozone is considered a pollutant by enviormentalists and we banned ozone generating products as well in the 1970's. Virtually all enviormental issues having nothing to do with the enviorment and everything to do with socialism.
13 posted on 01/27/2006 3:29:19 PM PST by CyberSpartacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

The product would not be used for a moderate or severe problem. Asthma can kill. But the inhaler seems to be enough to take care of an occasional light touch of asthma. By all means, if the problem is severe get to the doctor.


14 posted on 01/27/2006 3:34:10 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Okay, I say all those who want to do this can have their suggestions seriously considered AFTER they have their air supplies restricted to about 10% for 120 consecutive minutes. Then maybe they'll have a slight idea of what asthma feels like.

The environs are probably the most successful mass murderers on the planet. They have killed literally millions with the successful banning of DDT. They are probably more dangerous overall that any terrorists we face.


15 posted on 01/27/2006 3:35:25 PM PST by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

My daughter learned to make aspirin recently at a seventh grade physical sciences/biological sciences seminar for "gifted" kids. She brought it home for us to see. They did not have time to press the stuff into pills. She thought it was pretty cool.


16 posted on 01/27/2006 3:36:30 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"other aerosols that use recently developed propellants currently not deemed to present environmental problems."

What's the problem?

17 posted on 01/27/2006 3:38:04 PM PST by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity

So you're OK with this ban? Does the little bit of CFCs in these inhalers actually get under your skin?


18 posted on 01/27/2006 3:57:48 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Jack Murtha: America's best-known EX-marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

"No aspirin?"........THIS MEANS WAR!


19 posted on 01/27/2006 4:03:31 PM PST by goodnesswins (Seahawks headin' to the Superbowl for first time in 30 years....FINALLY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

Albuterol requires a prescription.


20 posted on 01/27/2006 4:03:56 PM PST by Mears (The Killer Queen-caviar and cigarettes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

HOW did THEY make aspirin? At school?


21 posted on 01/27/2006 4:04:22 PM PST by goodnesswins (Seahawks headin' to the Superbowl for first time in 30 years....FINALLY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Jeez.

For the first time in over 10 years, I had to break down and go to the drug store to get one of these inhalers, because I could not stop wheezing after a brisk, two mile hike on Wednesday.

I rarely buy these things, but it made the difference for me of wheezing, staying up all night and calling my doctor, or getting a good nights rest (and oxygen.)

CFC's, the FDA, and these environazi's be damned.

22 posted on 01/27/2006 4:10:44 PM PST by kstewskis ("There you go again..." R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
No inhalers, no sudafed and coming soon no asprin.

The pharma lobby, acting through Jack Abramoff as usual, is lobbying to have everything we ingest put on prescription. Coming soon: prescription requirements on aspirin, water, and air.

23 posted on 01/27/2006 4:11:08 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

propane could be used as a propellant


24 posted on 01/27/2006 4:11:48 PM PST by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

I have an Albuterol inhaler but it is by prescription. Albuterol is a controlled drug.


25 posted on 01/27/2006 4:11:52 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
I don't agree with banning aerosol epinepherine, but to be fair, albuterol is generic, and not terribly expensive.

The problem is that albuterol can only be purchased by prescription. Basically, insurance companies make it so you can only buy one inhaler at a time within an arbitrary period. If you happen to: (a) run out, or (b) misplace your inhaler, and (c) its too soon to buy another one feel, yet you an attack coming on, Primatine (or its equivalent) is an excellent fall-back choice.

This has happened to me on occasion, and I have been very grateful to be able to get Primatine easily.

Epinepherine does increase heart rate and raise blood pressure, however, so it is best used sparingly by people with hypertension.

26 posted on 01/27/2006 4:15:29 PM PST by Wolfstar (Someday when we meet up yonder, we'll stroll hand in hand again, in a land that knows no parting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz

We told em so PING


27 posted on 01/27/2006 4:17:36 PM PST by The Foolkiller (This country is so proud of the "Freedom" it has. Yet every law that's passed takes more of it away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CyberSpartacus
The "Hole" in the ozone layer is a natural occurrence due to the earths magnetic field ...
There you go ruining everything with facts! [/sarc]
28 posted on 01/27/2006 4:20:34 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

These people are stark raving bonkers. How the H do asthma inhalers post the slightest risk to the environment? It's not like people with inhalers are squirting them up into the air, for crying out loud. You breathe the entire dose into your lungs. That's why they're called "inhalers".

What a bunch of idiots.


29 posted on 01/27/2006 4:25:14 PM PST by Cymbaline (I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Foolkiller

These are the same people that will be jumping on the idiotic California crapola that SHS causes asthma bandwagon.........tough luck.


30 posted on 01/27/2006 4:28:18 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All
The miniscule amount of CFCs in OTC asthma sprays are INHALED, for crying out loud! That's the point of the delivery system! These people are absolute idiots. Millions of Americans without health insurance suffer from asthma, and rely on these inhalers.

In addition, many asthmatics WITH health insurance occasionally find themselves having an asthma attack while they don't have an inhaler (left it home, are on vacation, don't usually carry one but need one momentarily, etc.). It's a comforting feeling for ANY asthmatic to know they can pop into any drugstore, plop down $8-12 and get those invisible hands from around their throat. I speak from personal experience

31 posted on 01/27/2006 4:28:54 PM PST by BushMeister ("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Foolkiller
We told em so PING

I heard this on Fox News yesterday.  I can't believe it.

Millions of people depend on Primatene Mist.  I guess the ozone is more important then people's lives.

What a crock the FDA is.  I'm sick of them!

32 posted on 01/27/2006 4:31:15 PM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

your doctor can shorten that period by the way he writes the prescription because insurance companies cannot tell a doctor how to write a prescription....yet.


33 posted on 01/27/2006 4:37:19 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

;No inhalers, no sudafed and coming soon no asprin.

No aspirin. Well the active ingredient in aspirin can be extracted by boiling willow bark. In fact that is how aspirin got started.

So they can't ban aspirin unless they ban willow trees. And since they've already made several other plants illegal who knows..............


34 posted on 01/27/2006 4:39:11 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I can only assume that most of these folks have never had the feeling that pallet of bricks was parked over their chest. Drugs have come a long way since my first memory of an asthma attack in 1956. Here's hoping the same tx can be packaged without CFCs.


35 posted on 01/27/2006 4:39:31 PM PST by jimfree (Freep and Ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruoflaw
your doctor can shorten that period by the way he writes the prescription because insurance companies cannot tell a doctor how to write a prescription....yet.

And, of course, don't submit it for insurance coverage.

36 posted on 01/27/2006 4:45:58 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cymbaline; BushMeister
It's not like people with inhalers are squirting them up into the air, for crying out loud. You breathe the entire dose into your lungs. That's why they're called "inhalers".

Right. Have you noticed how these people never exhale? All those CFCs are just absorbed into the bloodstream, I guess. </sarc>

You might want to hesitate before casting that "idiot" stone. :-)

37 posted on 01/27/2006 4:48:11 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ruoflaw
your doctor can shorten that period by the way he writes the prescription because insurance companies cannot tell a doctor how to write a prescription....yet.

I have encountered the problem of having to use the albuterol inhaler a bit more often than normal during a given month. I've gone to the pharmacy to buy another, and was told the insurance company would not pay for it because they said I should only use a certain number of puffs in a certain number of days.

38 posted on 01/27/2006 4:51:54 PM PST by Wolfstar (Someday when we meet up yonder, we'll stroll hand in hand again, in a land that knows no parting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
The pharma lobby, acting through Jack Abramoff as usual, is lobbying to have everything we ingest put on prescription. Coming soon: prescription requirements on aspirin, water, and air.

Yeppers...all the Big Nanny Government types, Republicans and Democrats alike, are loving how we slap prescription requirements on these things. Except for public health risks (such as overuse of antibiotics), there shouldn't be a prescription requirement. As supportive as I am of physicians, there's no reason people should have to shell out the cash to see a doc to get a prescription for many medications.

39 posted on 01/27/2006 5:11:22 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: festus
So they can't ban aspirin unless they ban willow trees. And since they've already made several other plants illegal who knows..............

They can either ban the plant, or try to stop people from extracting it. I think the DEA and FDA (and let's not forget Treasury!) would love to knock on a few doors to go after home-grown "aspirin labs"... :-(

40 posted on 01/27/2006 5:14:49 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

I have had asthma for 67 years
Those over the counter inhalers do nothing for me

I rarely need the prescription for an attack but use it before jogging on cold days as a preventative


41 posted on 01/27/2006 5:16:12 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I'd be lost without Albuterol. I buy what I have to have, regardless of cost. IMO the lives of many asthmatics, including mine, would be greatly shortened without this drug.

I remember as a kid in the early 50's how it was before the stuff existed.


42 posted on 01/27/2006 5:22:41 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
I think I was unclear in my post. I didn't mean that there was no need for the meds that currently require a prescription. What I meant was that the meds are needed, but a prescription shouldn't be required.
43 posted on 01/27/2006 5:23:48 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It's just another step towards national health insurance: 'These poor people can't afford to go to the doctor to get a prescription for their inhalers...'


44 posted on 01/27/2006 5:32:02 PM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

The Rhinocort AQ (aqueous version) doesn't work for me like the old aerosol did. I no longer bother trying it.


45 posted on 01/27/2006 5:43:20 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I have a standing prescription for Albuterol. My asthma is quite mild, so, fortunately, I seldom need the inhaler. Even with my insurance, the Primatene Mist is less expensive. And for me, the Primatene works as well as the Albuterol.

My mother (87 years old) is a life-long smoker. (someday those cigarettes will kill her), also has an Albuterol prescription. But she says the Primatene works better for her. Go figure.

Methinks I should stock up on the Primatene. Stupid enviro-wackos.


46 posted on 01/27/2006 5:43:29 PM PST by Rushmore Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I'd be lost without Albuterol. I buy what I have to have, regardless of cost. IMO the lives of many asthmatics, including mine, would be greatly shortened without this drug.

Wouldn't it be nice if the FDA didn't have a de facto ban of phenylpropanolamine, with the current attempts to get it removed from all products and the recent proposed rule to reclassify it as nonmonograph (Category II) not generally recognized as safe and effective. :-( But like with albuterol, this medication is one for which many people would gladly accept the small added risks of hemorrhagic stroke if they could use it, since not all products are interchangeable.

But I am not a physician.

47 posted on 01/27/2006 5:50:29 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
You need to do two things:

First, have your doctor write the prescription for three inhalers at once. That's how our doctor writes it. Then my son can have one at home, one at school, and one to carry around with him.

Two, have your doctor also re-assess how your asthma is being managed. You may need some additional meds (like an inhaled corticosteroid, or some of the other new alternatives). You should not be so dependent on the rescue inhaler that you're in danger of running out quickly.

Third, sign up with a different health insurance carrier. This one's protocol stinks.

48 posted on 01/27/2006 5:52:05 PM PST by Capriole (The Anti-Feminist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I, er, meant, uh, three things. (sheepish grin)


49 posted on 01/27/2006 5:52:58 PM PST by Capriole (The Anti-Feminist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I agree with the other poster that if you're burning through albuterol inhalers you may need additional medication. However, the price of a generic albuterol inhaler is about $15, so paying for it out of pocket isn't much worse than buying an over the counter inhaler, and a lot more effective.


50 posted on 01/27/2006 6:00:27 PM PST by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson