Posted on 01/27/2006 3:12:26 PM PST by RouxStir
DAVOS - UN nuclear chief Mohamed ElBaradei on Friday called on the United States to provide Iran with nuclear reactors, and urged Tehran to declare a moratorium on enriching uranium for at least eight years.
He said eight or nine years would enable the country to earn the confidence of the international community that it was really interested in nuclear energy - not nuclear weapons.
(Excerpt) Read more at haaretz.com ...
All you gotta do is look at ElBaradei's first name to know where his allegiance is.
This does not address Iran's expressed plan to bomb Israel.
This guy is another UN joke.
And Lincoln provided John Wilkes Booth with a pistol.
Reactors? Heck, let's drop 10 nukes.
Let's just cut to the chase and provide them with a couple of nuclear weapons. I hear the Air Force delivers.
Fortunately, unlike North Korea, the beardbrains in
Tehran are not going to accept this offer.
And the turn-down may be useful in the pretense-at-
diplomacy going on while the real remedies are planned.
So El B may actually be doing us a favor.
But don't tell him that.
The plan worked so well with Clinton and North Korea...
Will a nuclear reaction do?
Yeah right. Why bother? Why don't we just go ahead and kill ourselves and save time?
Why don't more people realize that the insane Islamofascists are at total war with Western civilization and want to kill us all?
Push is coming to shove, why don't we just push and shove them all first and get it over with?
Life is binary. I choose me over them.
"This does not address Iran's expressed plan to bomb Israel."
Iran and other muslim nations have explicitely stated their intentions regarding Israel publicly, to the UN and as part of UN functions. So the UN's behavior indicates approval of these intentions.
Okay. We build it AND we run it in exchange for their oil. All of it. At $10 a barrel. They need electricity not weapons right? What a deal for them!
Yes, but we could also ask Bill and Hillary to tell the truth once in a while, but it ain't doing to happen.
This is a Friday joke thread?
Why don't we provide ourselves with nuclear reactors first so we can generate power that way and not have to buy their damn oil?
Oh no, too sensible. Eco-libs wouldn't approve. Not gonna happen.
Maybe Clinton can supply him as he did DPRK.
Yeah, sure, we're going to do whatever some guy named
Mohamed tells us to do.
"El Poopdoodi is in such a pickle"
Yep, he's gonna have a nuclear war on his hands soon...and he will be responsible by allowing this proliferation to continue in Iran.
Yes we are, a race to avoid barbarians EXTERMINATING a entire race of people. I would however; like to thank El Baradei for admiting the u.n. is powerless to control, police or adjudicate in this matter. Now we can take care of it and quit dancing around diplomatic channels, we can take out their nuclear facilities.
I think it might also be a interesting exercise to freeze El Baradei's assets and see just where the money came from to propose this daring plan of his, as always............follow the money.
LOL, I'm sure that would get in the way of Kofi & Son's business dealings. Wouldn't want to upset them.
The UN is a non-governmental organization, an NGO. Nothing they say has any necessary bearing on reality. UNESCO a few decades ago attempted to put all history on a computer. Sounded like a good idea at the time, like an attempt to put earth's climate on computer. Those employed by the UN are actually working for NGOs within the big NGO, and all completely independent of each other. There is no reason to listen to what any of these employees has to say any more than the guy on the next barstool.
Notice that he was in Davos with Kerry and Clinton when he decided to drop this little turd in the punch bowl.
"We are running in a race against time," he said
(yeah! The yankee infidels are almost on to us and Iran might not be able to finish their bomb!)
Somewhere in this convoluted reasoning there is an appeal to being "fair".
There is an approaching gunfight in which the opponent is as yet armed only with a knife, and the protagonist is supposed to toss him a loaded gun....
I cannot see a good outcome in any of these proposals.
In a perfect world, the choice of an oil-producing country to convert their national energy sources from petroleum-based to nuclear-based would translate to having more energy to export, and on balance, for the world this would be a good thing. Maximizes the amount of product for sale, while not eating their own seed corn.
But bearded men with burning eyes are running Iran today, and anything they lay their hands upon is being used as a weapon, be it economic, or cultural, or just the physical means of damage on a massive scale.
These will be "fast" reactors...actually classed as "extremely fast" reactors, of our own design.
Thanks for the suggestion, El Boy. Always happy to further the aims of the UN...!
Where is the "ARE YOU F'ING KIDDING ME" in the title ?
Uranium power plants are a great invention and should be in use worldwide, especially in China and India where the coal smoke sometimes gets bad. Especially China. Of course, oil sales would be much less, and coal even less than that. Iran would have a hard time getting by on carpet sales.
I got a better Idea. Lets just send the fuel in nice 20 kg bundles by ICBM.
Although comparing the Angry Ayatollahs to the average 2 year old is an insult to most 2 year olds.
Sounds close enough for UN work.
That worked really well with North Korea (not).
ONLY BOMBS will save us.
Nothing else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.