Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. IN TECHNICAL DEFAULT
financial sense online ^ | January 27, 2006 | Chris Martenson

Posted on 01/28/2006 7:19:25 PM PST by hubbubhubbub

In a shocking development, the Treasury Department website is openly stating that as of January 24, 2006 our national debt stood at $8,185.3 billion and on January 26th at $8,190.5 billion.

http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpenny.htm

Yet the US national debt ‘ceiling’, the maximum amount of debt the US government may hold at any one time, stands at $8,184 billion – a full $5.5 billion less. Although called upon by John Snow, Congress has not yet passed an expansion of the debt ceiling and so the US government is now operating in technical default.

You may recall that when last the debt ceiling was approached in the months surrounding the 2004 elections, the Treasury department furiously employed every accounting trick in the book (and then some) to avoid breaching the limit. They even went so far as to take the unprecedented step of borrowing $14 billion from the Federal Financing Bank to cover up the shortfall.

But they never breached the ceiling.

On January 24th they breached it brazenly and openly and with nary an accompanying explanation. Neither have any lawmakers have broached this indelicate subject.

I suppose we could write this off as merely an unsurprising development from a government that no longer bothers to even appear to be adhering to rules, laws and procedures, let alone actually doing so.

But the silence is all the more troubling because there is an unprecedented level of government borrowing on the books for 1Q06 with next 2 weeks (Feb 1st to Feb 9th) an especially busy period of time. An ambitious ~$70-$80b in Treasury paper will hit the market.

The federal government does not have the legal authority to borrow above the statutory debt limit, which raises the prospect of emergency congressional action to avoid a full-fledged default.

Congress will probably attach a rider to a “must-pass” defense appropriation bill and ironically title it “The Fiscal Responsibility Amendment of 2006”. And if they do, $50 says they do it very late on Friday night.

Since the debt ceiling has been raised 50 times over the past 40 years, hoping for some rational debate on the matter would be an extravagant indulgence. Time spent wishing pigs could fly would offer a far better potential return.

Another odd facet of this story is the deafening silence from the financial press (and I use that term loosely) regarding this matter. Leaving aside the issue of a technical default, one wonders why questions aren’t being asked about the rate of debt accumulation and whether it’s sustainable.

The last debt-ceiling adjustment was $800 billion and was passed in November 2004. Now, on January 24th 2006, it is entirely gone. $800 billion in only 16 months for an average of $50B a month.

Factoring out the plundering of excess social security contributions, the US government borrowed $52B in 3Q05, $96B in 4Q05 and expects to borrow $171B in 1Q06. A trend nearly as mind-boggling as the soon to be discontinued M3 series.

Why do I even bother to pen such distressing factoids?

Because in all my time studying economics I have determined only one thing; there’s no free lunch. Pay now or pay later but pay we will.

Or, more accurately, we hope that our kids will, and not stiff us for the bill. But if they did, who could blame them?

I, for one, would not be shocked.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: buymygoldbuymygold; fox; goldbuggery; goldgoldgold; goldmineshaft; goldshills; henhouse; hysterical; yukoncornelius

1 posted on 01/28/2006 7:19:25 PM PST by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub
Leaving aside the issue of a technical default, one wonders why questions aren’t being asked about the rate of debt accumulation and whether it’s sustainable.

Use an extreme example... what would happen if the debt were 100 times more than it is? Who, exactly, is the "Repo man" that would start hauling government property away for auction?

2 posted on 01/28/2006 7:25:57 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

As the world economy and the US economy grows, so will the deficit. In fact there would be some bad ramifications to paying the deficit off entirely. That's a different topic.

So yes, we'll get these scary stories about the US going bankrupt unless Congress passes a law every year to make it worse, but it's really just a symptom of growing wealth in this country and nothing really new.


3 posted on 01/28/2006 7:26:45 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub; Willie Green
We are Doomed!
4 posted on 01/28/2006 7:27:27 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Why can't they just use one of their credit cards ... ???


5 posted on 01/28/2006 7:31:33 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Every bit of minted and printed money is to be backed by gold and it looks like the govt. either needs to get serious about budget cuts, start $hitting gold bricks, or borrow one of Willy Wonkas golden egg laying geese.


6 posted on 01/28/2006 7:59:09 PM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Ok but think of all the air miles we got


7 posted on 01/28/2006 8:02:27 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diverteach

I dunno ... is a hyperinflationary spiral really that bad?


8 posted on 01/28/2006 8:08:55 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub
<sarcasm>I sure am glad that the republicans are in charge, or we might have to worry about out of control spending. </sarcasm>
9 posted on 01/28/2006 8:12:17 PM PST by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: hubbubhubbub

This aint what is referred to as being in default. Regardless of what the headline writer thinks.


11 posted on 01/28/2006 8:14:05 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub
Or, more accurately, we hope that our kids will, and not stiff us for the bill. But if they did, who could blame them?

Well, of course they are going to stiff the Baby Boomers - the moment it becomes more important for politicians to pander to the younger generations. There's no way to keep the promises that have been made by politicians who will be dead long before the bill comes due. I hope people at the tail end of the Boomer generation aren't counting on Social Security, Medicare, or retirement before age 85. ;)

12 posted on 01/28/2006 8:17:02 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: diverteach
Every bit of minted and printed money is to be backed by gold and it looks like the govt. either needs to get serious about budget cuts, start $hitting gold bricks, or borrow one of Willy Wonkas golden egg laying geese.

Did we go back to the gold standard and I missed it?

14 posted on 01/28/2006 8:19:50 PM PST by xjcsa (The Kyoto Protocol is about as futile as sending seven maids with seven mops to rid a beach of sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

No problem. We announce that the U.S. dollar will be backed by uranium and plutonium, and since we have one helluva pile of that stuff, our financial worries as a nation are completely over.


15 posted on 01/28/2006 8:42:00 PM PST by mkjessup (Thank YOU Jimmy F'in Carter, you chicklet-grinning SOB, for stabbing the Shah of Iran in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
or our we on the silver standard somebody skipped high school history.
16 posted on 01/28/2006 8:57:15 PM PST by postaldave (democrats=traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Keep those fiat money printing presses running. That ought to cover all debts.


17 posted on 01/28/2006 8:59:51 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Pfft! Hey, the government doesn't have to follow the laws! The government IS the law! And the politicians are above the law!

Laws are for losers... And subjects... And slaves...

Mark


18 posted on 01/28/2006 9:02:44 PM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
This guy is just trying to sell gold futures.

Well, I'm investing heavily in canned goods and shotgun shells!

Mark

19 posted on 01/28/2006 9:04:10 PM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Foreclosure!


20 posted on 01/28/2006 9:04:33 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hubbubhubbub

Foreclosure!


21 posted on 01/28/2006 9:04:47 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson