Skip to comments.Why we should take Osama's olive branch ,It's the first step in winning the peace
Posted on 01/29/2006 9:15:24 AM PST by Pikamax
Osama bin Laden's offer of a truce has sunk from sight without leaving a ripple, but it should have made waves.
When the audiotaped proposal was made 10 days ago, the White House dismissed it out of hand. That was a politically logical move, given the need to appear tough on terror at all times. An image of strength and determination may be particularly important in the months ahead because Republican Party leaders have put security issues at the heart of their 2006 congressional election campaign strategy.
But there are reasons why bin Laden's overture should be carefully weighed and thoughtfully debated.
The moral imperative that should drive us is a sincere desire to end the long suffering of the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. Official figures suggest that 30,000 innocent noncombatants have been killed since March 2003 in Iraq alone. Many respected sources believe that this figure is grossly underestimated.
So if bin Laden were to call off his dogs of war, it would be a very good thing, saving lives by removing major elements in the insurgencies in both countries. Such al Qaeda withdrawals would sharply reduce the need for our forces to remain in these sad lands.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
We should be grateful this idiot is not part of the Administration.
(Save this comment for the 2008 campaign.)
Sure, John, negotiate with terrorists...great idea. You go first. (These were the first people to generate hatred for anyone talking to the Iranians who could help free hostages.)
And if my aunt had any balls, she'd be my uncle.
John Boy voted for Kerry, right?
John Arquilla is professor of defense analysis at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey.
This man, like so many educated people, fails to understand the nature of evil.
Or the concept of jihad - rightly or wrongly- as interpreted by wahabbism.
No sir, the moral imperative is to stand firm against and seek to destroy evil.
OBL is an evil man.
Seeking to make truce with evil is moral weakness and human fallacy.
Im surprised it took the appeasers this long to crawl out
Excuse me, Mr. Arquilla? Just how do we negotiate a peace deal with a dead terrorist? *Smirk*
Someone is off of their meds.
But I have no doubt the next democrat president will pick an idiot of like mind to be the next secretary of state.
We pretty much had a truce with him before 9/11. He'd attack us. We wouldn't respond.
He'd like that again.
John Arquilla is a fool.
Better yet, we should surrender and put our heads on the chopping block to be beheaded, as Islam requires of infidels who don't embrace the death cult.
Let's put another Clinton back in the White House to show how we prefer inaction to terrorism.
Bin Laden's offer is a clear signal that he
acknowledges a buttocks whipping.
This so-called military expert doesn't
seem to realize that you don't offer
a truce when you're winning.
Away with the offer. Continue to hunt
down the son of a camel and bomb the
enemy when we get the chance.
(I have not served. My tagline honors my son and my cousin.)
Is there a comprehensive list of terrorist attacks(pre 9/11)?
John's never watched any professional wrestling. When the bad guy offers to shake the good guy's hand, he's only doing it so he can throw a sucker punch.
Our counter-terrorism guys shuld be forced to watch a compilation of Ed "the Sheik" Farhat's matches from the 60's and 70's at Detroit's Cobo arena. That guy displayed the terrorist mind set long before Osama came along.
Yeah, but not serious ones.
Anyone who even begins to believe that someone on the other side of this thing would tell the truth is even too dumb to have a "brain fart".
'Appearances' have nothing whatsoever to do with it. If one commits onself to combat, the ultimate objective is, as it ought to be, the elimination of the enemy's ability to make war. One does not request a truce from a position of strength. Al-Q is on the run. Now is the time to pile on- not allow them to regroup, retrench and gather strenth for another attack on this country. 'Olive branch' my fanny.
I would expect somebody teaching at the Naval Postgrad school to know better.
We were "winning the peace" on the morning of 09-11-01. To most human beings, FREEDOM trumps "peace."
Yes, his offer of truce was conditional. It was based on meeting all his demands and paying extortion, simply put.
I think bin Laden can shove his truce.
I have a peace branch for Osama, it is high and sturdy, and comes complete with a rope and a noose.
I read the title, scratched my head, saw the source, and it all became clear.
And we wonder who buys those lemons sitting on used car lots.
How can you tell a Muslim is not telling the truth?
His lips are moving.
THis man purposefully embraced a widely known mistranslation to the furtherance of goals so vile, it can only be described as treason.
He demands the death of Americans on American soil be considered morally superior to the death of Americans Coaliation country citizens, Afghanis and Iraqis in Afghan and Iraq.
Professor Arquilla should have his position at the Monterey School eliminated, he should be given no severance package, and his pension should be requisitioned. All of his security clearances should be removed, and his ability to communicate with Naval officers halted by court order on basis of treason.
THIS MAN KNOWS THAT AL JEZEERA MISTRANSLATED OSAMA'S MESSAGE .
Rule of thumb: Anytime muslim combatants offer a truce, it's part of their military strategy just like their religion is part of their politics.
I thought it was only 10 minutes
Not the first strange noise from that place.
Thanks, genius. A decade of Oslo got us a lot of dead Israelis, and a lot of dead arab teenagers. And, in the end, Hamas.
So if bin Laden were to call off his dogs of war... Such al Qaeda withdrawals would sharply reduce the need for our forces to remain in these sad lands.
Is he serious? Seriously, this guy needs to find a new line of work, we can't have him teaching military officers if we are going to have any hope.
Ending the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq would reduce the huge strain imposed on the U.S. military, tying it down and seriously impairing its ability to respond swiftly to new crises, such as those that might arise on the Korean peninsula or elsewhere.
"Reduce the strain"? Reduce the strain by building it bigger and better, not by abandoning the field. The military is not a social program, or an ornament which must not be taken down off the shelf for fear of getting it dusty. It is there to be used, and if it is getting beaten up by use, then fix it, build it stronger so it can take the pounding. But you have to know that if the marines are taking a pounding, their enemies are dying in droves.
If Bin Ladin is asking for a truce, it is because he has tired of living on the run, he has seen what happened to Saddam and his sons, he sees that he is losing control of the movement he helped to build. He wants to come above ground, where he can have more direct communications and influence, and so he can get a bath and a hot cup of coffee.
If he's asking for a break, I think that means we're winning.
First step in insuring massive civilian casualties ala The Battle of Britain, the invasion of Poland, et al.
Mr. Arquilla has never heard the word 'hudna' before?
* The U.S. to withdraw from and abandon operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
* Al-Qaeda to reestablish control in Iraq and Afghanistan.
* In exchange for the above two points, Al-Qaeda will agree to halt all of its nonexistent attacks on American soil, and halt planning of future hypothetical attacks of same.
* This truce is to last until Al-Qaeda has rebuilt its infrastructure in Iraq and Afghanistan.
* Upon expiration as per the point above, Al-Qaeda may resume planning and executing attacks on American targets, and...um, the U.S. would have to retake Iraq and Afghanistan if they wanted to reestablish a presence there.
Sounds like a fair deal to me. We should thank our lucky stars that Al-Qaeda is in such a bad position that they have to offer such generous terms of surrender to us. /sarc
Send Jimmy Carter to negotiate with Osama. He would kidnap Carter and we would know Osama is not sincere.Its a win-win situation.
Does he mean like the peace that was offered to the Palis? It worked so well! *now removing tongue from cheek*
Actually this sounds more like a job for a former swift boat commander. Know of any laying around that might like to see us negotiate with terrorists?
I agree. We should take his olive branch, shove it up his a$$ and parade his impaled, rotting carcass around in front of Al-Jazeera
Geez....Osama didn't offer to withdraw his forces!
He offered a truce if WE withdrew and let al Qaeda "rebuild" Iraq AND Afghanistan.
"Professor of Defense Analysis" my a##. And on the military payroll to boot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.