Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Koppel Pens First Piece as 'NY Times' Columnist--Comes Out Swinging
Editor and Publisher ^ | 01/29/06 | E&P Staff

Posted on 01/29/2006 9:20:51 AM PST by Pikamax

Ted Koppel Pens First Piece as 'NY Times' Columnist--Comes Out Swinging

By E&P Staff

Published: January 29, 2006 12:45 AM ET

NEW YORK In his first contribution after being named a New York Times columnist, former ABC newsman Ted Koppel declares, "I cannot help but see that the industry in which I have spent my entire adult life is in decline and in distress."

Koppel raps the new "calculated subjectivity" and forced empathy of cable news, and adds: "The accusation that television news has a political agenda misses the point. Right now, the main agenda is to give people what they want. It is not partisanship but profitability that shapes what you see."

But his view is that journalists "should be telling their viewers what is important, not the other way around. "

In a surprise conclusion, he suggests that perhaps rather than aiming news shows at the disinterested younger segment, the networks should focus on serving older consumers who actually are interested in serious news. (Is there a lesson for newspapers here?)

The goal for the traditional broadcast networks now "is to identify those segments of the audience considered most desirable by the advertising community and then to cater to them," Koppel writes. "Most television news programs are therefore designed to satisfy the perceived appetites of our audiences. That may be not only acceptable but unavoidable in entertainment; in news, however, it is the journalists who should be telling their viewers what is important, not the other way around.

"Indeed, in television news these days, the programs are being shaped to attract, most particularly, 18-to-34-year-old viewers. They, in turn, are presumed to be partly brain-dead — though not so insensible as to be unmoved by the blandishments of sponsors.

"Most particularly on cable news, a calculated subjectivity has, indeed, displaced the old-fashioned goal of conveying the news dispassionately. But that, too, has less to do with partisan politics than simple capitalism." Koppel knocks CNN's new emphasis on journalism-by-empathy, and observes: "Even Fox News's product has less to do with ideology and more to do with changing business models...

"Now, television news should not become a sort of intellectual broccoli to be jammed down our viewers' unwilling throats. We are obliged to make our offerings as palatable as possible. But there are too many important things happening in the world today to allow the diet to be determined to such a degree by the popular tastes of a relatively narrow and apparently uninterested demographic....

"If the network news divisions cannot be convinced that their future depends on attracting all demographic groups, then perhaps, at least, they can be persuaded to aim for the largest single demographic with the most disposable income — one that may actually have an appetite for serious news. That would seem like a no-brainer. "


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcnews; broadcastnews; cablenews; histedness; koppel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Pikamax

Ted Koppel wouldn't be who and where he is today if not for Jimmy Carter's bungling of the Iranian hostage fiasco.


21 posted on 01/29/2006 9:44:16 AM PST by InvisibleChurch (The search for someone to blame is always successful. - Robert Half)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"The accusation that television news has a political agenda misses the point. Right now, the main agenda is to give people what they want. It is not partisanship but profitability that shapes what you see."

It sounds to me as though it is Koppel who has missed the point. TV AND print news has an agenda and, if profitability were the primary concern, people by the trainload wouldn't be turning their TVs off. Someone needs to show Koppel the latest spreadsheet on television profits.
22 posted on 01/29/2006 9:44:22 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; Happygal; Senator Bedfellow

Ping for NY Times in scare quotes.


23 posted on 01/29/2006 9:46:56 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

And he blames cable news! Partisanship wormed its way into network news long before profitability was ever an issue. Network news partisanship dates back to the 50s and 60s!


24 posted on 01/29/2006 9:46:58 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (How long do we have to pretend that Democrats are patriots?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"I cannot help but see that the industry in which I have spent my entire adult life is in decline and in distress."

Such petulance as described in this column presupposes the notion that Koppel is actually an adult.

25 posted on 01/29/2006 9:47:27 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Defeatism may have its partisan uses but it is not justified by the facts.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"Alright you stupid little people. We'll tell you what's important and what isn't. You just shut up and listen." Ted still doesn't get it.


26 posted on 01/29/2006 9:51:42 AM PST by FlyVet (Our corrupt politicians are better than their corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The television journalists should be telling people the TRUTH about the news, not what they think is important!
27 posted on 01/29/2006 9:52:29 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Pikamax
Cronkite, Rather, Koppel -- don't these people know what RETIRE means? It means that you move to Florida, wear shorts and wing-tip shoes with black socks, yell at kids to get off your lawn -- and SHUT THE H*** UP!!!

The exagerated sense of self-importance of these people is galling.
29 posted on 01/29/2006 9:57:22 AM PST by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Well put!


30 posted on 01/29/2006 9:59:35 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: putupjob

I don't know if I agree with Koppel's rant, but why do you call him "one of the worst partisan hack jobbers of all time?"

He's never reminded me of Aaron Brown


31 posted on 01/29/2006 10:00:50 AM PST by Natchez Hawk (What's so funny about the first, second, and fourth Amendments?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Ted is just crying because now with the internet, the "ignorant masses" that need to be "educated" have discovered a new source of stories that the masters of the airways have deliberately left out or distorted beyond reality.


32 posted on 01/29/2006 10:09:10 AM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I somehow think it fitting that Ted "Whopper" Koppel is working for the DNC-Slimes.


33 posted on 01/29/2006 10:13:07 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Koppel = Propaganda CRITIC.. he decides whether its "good" propaganda or not so "good" propaganda.. What was his name Ed.. Ed Koppel..

We are not so easily fooled Ed..

34 posted on 01/29/2006 10:13:14 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
But his view is that journalists "should be telling their viewers what is important, not the other way around."

so we agree....the Swift Boat Veteran's for Truth press conference this week is not important election year news and shouldn't be covered.....but Bush's fake TANG records from 1973 are...

35 posted on 01/29/2006 10:14:23 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington

Sad but true. And we, the masses, didn't get it then. Last year in high school history class my son was shown a 'year end review' from TV in the early 80's. He came home and told me how biased it was against the Repubs. This was during RR's presidency. I told him that most people believed the news then, it didn't occur to us not to. Really glad to have awakened to the blatant manipulation in favor of the 'progressives'. Wish I had realized it a long time ago.


36 posted on 01/29/2006 10:19:40 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek

And please read it without inflection or subjective adjectives while reading the news.


37 posted on 01/29/2006 10:22:24 AM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"I cannot help but see that the industry in which I have spent my entire adult life is in decline and in distress."

Some gig if you can get it. Koppel is getting big bucks to state the obvious.

38 posted on 01/29/2006 10:24:11 AM PST by Wolfstar (Someday when we meet up yonder, we'll stroll hand in hand again, in a land that knows no parting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Once again the Annointed show how they are incapable of seeing beyond their own arrogance and self-importance. Hey Ted: just STFU so we won't know what an idiot your are--with a totalitarian mindset.


39 posted on 01/29/2006 10:24:33 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

...get this on the air now Mapes....it's very important....... oh..and by the way who's Lucy Rameriz?

40 posted on 01/29/2006 10:27:10 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson