Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence That 2004 Election Was Stolen
NewsMax.com ^ | Jan. 20, 2006 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 01/30/2006 8:17:56 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-119 last
To: Toddsterpatriot
"...protectionists are notoriously bad at math."

There's a million kinds of people in the world.  Those that throw crazy numbers around and those that don't.

101 posted on 01/30/2006 2:46:01 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

I wonder if my favorite math major would get the joke?


102 posted on 01/30/2006 3:56:04 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
My point was and is that there were plenty of irregularities on the demoncrat side, and they were more serious than exit polling that nobody uses because it's not accurate. Look no further than 2000 when the alphabet networks learned that lesson.
103 posted on 01/31/2006 5:43:09 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

I knew they were nuts over there, but not THAT nuts!


104 posted on 01/31/2006 5:47:07 AM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
The chances of exit polls in five states being wrong are no more than one in a million. (OMG, what a stupid thing to say!!) Miller describes considerably more election fraud than voting machines programmed to count a proportion of Kerry votes as Bush votes.

I love how these moonbats just simply assume that there is no chance of fraud and manipulation in exit polls which have no checks and balances, but all the fraud is in the real polls which are closely watched and have numerous checks and balances.

105 posted on 01/31/2006 5:48:27 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
If that was and is your point, you'd be well advised to leave out this sentence in the future:

And why no mention of the state of Pennsylvania where the city of Philadelphia was clearly using voter fraud so that Kerry would carry the state?

Kerry carried PA because we got our @sses kicked in "Republican" suburbs. I'm very happy for the Dems to think they've lost because of Diebold machines, voter fraud, etc etc. It keeps them from changing their message, which is the real problem. We shouldn't make the same mistake. It might be reassuring to believe we lost PA because of a few thousand votes on voting machines in Philly, but we didn't. It's foolish to claim we did.

106 posted on 01/31/2006 10:22:18 AM PST by FredZarguna (Vilings Stuned my Beeber: Or, How I Learned to Live with Embarrassing NoSpellCheck Titles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Paul Craig Roberts is a hack. No better than a DU nutbar. There is not a shred, not a single shred of evidence or fact that the GOP "stole" the election. There is however, documented evidence of democrat dirty tricks and vote fraud throughout the country.


107 posted on 01/31/2006 10:28:46 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
There is not a shred, not a single shred of evidence or fact that the GOP "stole" the election. There is however, documented evidence of democrat dirty tricks and vote fraud throughout the country.

Exactly. Bush would have won New Mexico in 2000 and Wisconsin in 2000 and 2004 if Dem fraud had been prevented.

108 posted on 01/31/2006 10:31:22 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
My how times have changed. I grew up in Defuniak spgs. When I was a kid there was only one party, the democrats. Whoever won the Democratic primary was the automatic winner.

No one even showed up to vote in the general election. A couple of times someone would try to steal an election by having a bunch of people show up and write in a candidate since it would have only taken a few dozen to change the outcome.

Now it is solidly Republican. I haven't subscribed to the Defuniak Herald and Breeze Combined in maybe thirty years. I wonder if they have dropped the "Breeze" portion of the title? Any way all it was was local events and who visited who for the weekend etc. Guess I won't subscribe again.

109 posted on 01/31/2006 10:34:52 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Thanks for that link. It's like the Mad Hatter's Tea Party in there, only madder.


110 posted on 01/31/2006 10:37:27 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Assuming for a moment this is true and we stole the 2000 election as well, we have to steal five or six more presidential elections just to break even!

Remember Chicago in 1960? The wise guys delivered and got Bobby Kennedy in return. Bang Bang Bang!


111 posted on 01/31/2006 10:44:37 AM PST by Shooter1001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
AMENDMENT XXII Passed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951.

Section 1.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Cool. Bush/Cheney '08! How could the Donks object?

112 posted on 01/31/2006 10:48:33 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Just when did Paul Craig Roberts lose his mind?


113 posted on 01/31/2006 11:01:55 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

We have to cheat smarter than them with all the Democrat dead voting.


114 posted on 01/31/2006 11:04:47 AM PST by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Could have been as early as 1982. His symptoms got worse in 2001 after President Bush took office.


115 posted on 01/31/2006 11:05:02 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
History clearly shows that demoncrats have on various occasions stolen elections, and 1960 is a classic example. There are plenty of articles out there, but you have to read them.
116 posted on 02/01/2006 7:25:54 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

In the precinct where I was a watcher only 1 Republican voted on election day. They all voted early and Republican turnout was huge.


117 posted on 02/01/2006 7:33:08 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cliff h2

That's why they'll continue to lose elections. They blame it on fraud and not on their own positions.


118 posted on 02/01/2006 7:34:04 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
He may be correct.. except he got it reversed..

Any that would vote for Al Gore or John sKerry would be nut jobs.. A proper count would/should have them both with much less votes..

In 2008 the democrat voter fraud may be even more "refined"..
You know, the "bugs" fixed..

Because republicans seem to care less about all that..

119 posted on 02/01/2006 7:53:41 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-119 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson