Skip to comments.Darwinist Ideologues Are on the Run
Posted on 01/30/2006 10:27:35 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow
click here to read article
I love your tagline...it is quite appropriate at this stage of the thread...
Might explain why she couldn't stay away from the fruit, and why even today chimpanzees show innate fear of snakes.
Darwinist Ideologues Are on the Run
Posted by Ichneumon to caffe
On News/Activism 02/02/2006 12:36:52 PM PST · 828 of 1,152
Again, your document dumps are tedious.
Then don't read them. You don't anyway, so quit whining.
You are never able to keep on point.
Hold that thought, then let's look at your next sentence:
Perhaps you could begin by defining the terms transitional form and intermediate form.
HEY, STUPID! YEAH, I'M TALKING TO YOU!
Your folly is breathtaking. You whimper that I'm "never able to keep on point", and yet you then immediately turn around and ask a question THAT WAS ALREADY ANSWERED IN THE MATERIAL I POSTED. The material WAS DIRECTLY ON POINT, as shown by the fact that it SPECIFICALLY COVERED THE SUBJECT YOU ASK ABOUT.
You were just too busy whining to *LOOK* at the material and try to learn anything from it. You're more interesting in bitching about how I give you too *much* information as a lame excuse for not actually *looking* at it. You're more interested in your sophistry about what label to call it than in seeing what the evidence tells us, and how we validate our conclusions.
In short, you're a typical anti-evolution creationist, working hard to protect his beliefs from coming into contact with any knowledge that might challenge them.
Begone, fool. You add nothing of value to the discussion, and are stubbornly unwilling to learn from it yourself.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies
Here's but one. It would be silly for me to waste my time posting more as I am sure you know how to retreive them just as I do.
But I'm sure you see the name-calling.
You know, the name calling occurs on all sides of the issue...that just seems to be a given...the crevos, the evos, the IDers, all seem to give and take on the namecalling....I dont care for it, but I see it, from ALL sides, no one can claim innocence here...
What really irks me is 'misspeaking', which is the euphemistic way of saying 'lying'...when someone states something that is untrue, and they are called on it, yet they continue to spread that untruth around, that is beneath contempt..
Namecalling is one thing that is going to happen on these threads no matter what...it comes from ALL sides....
Misspeaking(lying) on purpose, is quite another thing...
I would ask when I have lied on here, but what's the point? Opinions are not lies.
And I find it surprising that you defend the atheists on here.
I am not defending any atheist(you do love to make things up, dont you?), concerning their atheism...unlike you, I dont need to know of people, if they are Christian, or atheist, or Buddhist, or whatever...what I cannot fathom, is why you think that the question of faith, is somehow tied to evolution...
You lie, or misspeak, when you try to intimate that those who support evolution are also atheistst....that is not the same as stating your opinion...you state your opinions as if they were facts, which they certainly are not...you have been told by me, and by many other Christians that you are completely wrong, yet you completely avoid or negate what we say, and continue to say that those who support evolution are atheists...you just cannot let go of that, and you need to be called on it...and yes, you do that, time and again...
Do you honestly believe that anyone who supports evolution is an atheist?...because you say it often enough...after being told you are wrong, you still continue to say it...
No matter what you chose to believe, most people who support evolution on these threads, also consider themselves to be Christians...you just ignore that tho, choosing to believe something else...I will gladly ping PatrickHenry to delve into his ping list, he has accumulated more info on the evo posters, and he himself, has stated that most of those on his ping evo list, consider themselves Christian, with about 3-5 percent considering themselves to be atheists...you dont seem to like those statistics, and thus you chose to ignore them, and continue to call those who support evolution, as atheists...which is a fine example of misspeaking...
They are johnny-one-notes and Asberger-obsessives...and a good way to avoid them is to enjoy all the other interesting FR conservative arguments going on that do not concern evolution. But they tend to be nasty little Girley-Men bullies, so it's a kindness to warn other freepers who might get caught up in their IM-coordinated two-minute gangups.
I've noticed that lately they stick mostly to talking to themselves, which is a kindness. I wonder why it has to be a public chat, though? They need an audience for their high-five parties? Then again, It probably gets lonely herding sheep up on that mountain.
Yep--Those Who Must Not Be Spoken To. I've repeatedly asked the ones who claim that they can't be addressed directly in a FR coversation on pain of banishment, to find some way to identify themselves--maybe with a tagline, "You're not allowed to speak to me," or some such.
Or perhaps the Ones Who May Not Speak to Those Who Must Not Be Spoken To can put together a database/spreadsheet for FR. It'd be interesting to see who is not allowed to speak, and who is not required to suffer to be spoken to.
Makes one think of Queens--Victoria and Elizabeth, that is--not to mention the Queen of Hearts.
They threaten to hassle the mods. Trouble is, how does one remember them from one discussion to the next? They all spout the same lines, after all..."You need to go back to biology class" "Well, you obviously know nothing about Science"--regular clones.
Then we won't see you on these threads anymore? Doubtful.
You have some nerve calling me an atheist when you don't even know me. You lie, equivocate, and run when challenged to back up your assertions. Some servant of God you must be.
My best friend who happens to be a Christian minister thinks you guys are being mislead BIGTIME by the Master Of Lies. How else is it so easy for you to lie? Think about it.
You can argue how you like. If you want to be taken seriously here you back up your assertions.
I'll assume you pretend otherwise.
Would you like to tell me what you mean? Don't tell me I abused anyone. And point 5 has nothing to do with this discussion as I haven't posted anything in the wrong forum.
I haven't run away from anything. I'm right here. Do you disagree that evolution in the public schools is an atheist agenda?
Eugenie Scott - one of my favorite atheists.
There's more but I am getting ready to go home now.
Enjoy your evening.
Sure does. You can see it in the posts they put forth right here on FR.
Teaching the ToE is a scientific agenda. I don't care if athiests or Shiite Muslims or rodeo clowns or boating enthusiasts are for it. Logically, it doesn't change the facts.
Are you backing away from calling me an athiest now?
I take it then you do not give up. I guess it's a woman's prerogative to change her mind........
The Muslims are anti-evolutionist. According to your logic, since you are against Muslims, you should be an evolutionist.
I think you are an athiest. Or you're a buddy of the Liar. Lies flow out of you like air.
Well, that depends. Do you believe the Bible is the inspired word of God?
Perhaps that is your logic but it isn't mine.
If I have lied, I was not aware of it. But I await your pointing it out to me.
Easy. You have been told many times that evolution and atheism are not the same thing. Yet many of your posts continue to conflate the two, pretending that the millions of religious people who accept the theory of evolution don't exist. Doing this once could be an error. Doing it multiple times when the error has been pointed out is simply lying. You are a liar.
If the atheist shoe fits....
You are a bigger liar. Nah, nah, nah. LOL
From you, "liar" is a compliment.
Always happy to put a smile on an atheist's face.
Not all of it. Doesn't make me an atheist, just not a Christian.
I'm sorry, it's the unwritten rule. I was using it as an idiom.
You accused Icky of disparaging believers in God, which is totally untrue.
And I totally disagree with you.
Or has had solutes added. Freezing point depression.
I somehow got bogged in reading this discussion after clicking a link to it in a recent discussion, and did not notice that I was reading an older topic when I came across your posting. I apologize for the necromancy.