Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwinist Ideologues Are on the Run
Human Events Online ^ | Jan 31, 2006 | Allan H. Ryskind

Posted on 01/30/2006 10:27:35 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 1,001-1,0501,051-1,1001,101-1,1501,151-1,188 last
To: dread78645

I love your tagline...it is quite appropriate at this stage of the thread...


1,151 posted on 02/06/2006 2:35:04 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1148 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
What if she were an ape?

Might explain why she couldn't stay away from the fruit, and why even today chimpanzees show innate fear of snakes.

1,152 posted on 02/06/2006 2:47:10 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1148 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

Darwinist Ideologues Are on the Run
Posted by Ichneumon to caffe
On News/Activism 02/02/2006 12:36:52 PM PST · 828 of 1,152

Again, your document dumps are tedious.

Then don't read them. You don't anyway, so quit whining.

You are never able to keep on point.

Hold that thought, then let's look at your next sentence:

Perhaps you could begin by defining the terms transitional form and intermediate form.

HEY, STUPID! YEAH, I'M TALKING TO YOU!

Your folly is breathtaking. You whimper that I'm "never able to keep on point", and yet you then immediately turn around and ask a question THAT WAS ALREADY ANSWERED IN THE MATERIAL I POSTED. The material WAS DIRECTLY ON POINT, as shown by the fact that it SPECIFICALLY COVERED THE SUBJECT YOU ASK ABOUT.

You were just too busy whining to *LOOK* at the material and try to learn anything from it. You're more interesting in bitching about how I give you too *much* information as a lame excuse for not actually *looking* at it. You're more interested in your sophistry about what label to call it than in seeing what the evidence tells us, and how we validate our conclusions.

In short, you're a typical anti-evolution creationist, working hard to protect his beliefs from coming into contact with any knowledge that might challenge them.

Begone, fool. You add nothing of value to the discussion, and are stubbornly unwilling to learn from it yourself.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies


Here's but one. It would be silly for me to waste my time posting more as I am sure you know how to retreive them just as I do.

But I'm sure you see the name-calling.


1,153 posted on 02/06/2006 4:15:37 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

You know, the name calling occurs on all sides of the issue...that just seems to be a given...the crevos, the evos, the IDers, all seem to give and take on the namecalling....I dont care for it, but I see it, from ALL sides, no one can claim innocence here...

What really irks me is 'misspeaking', which is the euphemistic way of saying 'lying'...when someone states something that is untrue, and they are called on it, yet they continue to spread that untruth around, that is beneath contempt..

Namecalling is one thing that is going to happen on these threads no matter what...it comes from ALL sides....

Misspeaking(lying) on purpose, is quite another thing...


1,154 posted on 02/06/2006 4:29:21 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1153 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

I would ask when I have lied on here, but what's the point? Opinions are not lies.

And I find it surprising that you defend the atheists on here.


1,155 posted on 02/06/2006 4:52:15 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1154 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I am not defending any atheist(you do love to make things up, dont you?), concerning their atheism...unlike you, I dont need to know of people, if they are Christian, or atheist, or Buddhist, or whatever...what I cannot fathom, is why you think that the question of faith, is somehow tied to evolution...

You lie, or misspeak, when you try to intimate that those who support evolution are also atheistst....that is not the same as stating your opinion...you state your opinions as if they were facts, which they certainly are not...you have been told by me, and by many other Christians that you are completely wrong, yet you completely avoid or negate what we say, and continue to say that those who support evolution are atheists...you just cannot let go of that, and you need to be called on it...and yes, you do that, time and again...

Do you honestly believe that anyone who supports evolution is an atheist?...because you say it often enough...after being told you are wrong, you still continue to say it...

No matter what you chose to believe, most people who support evolution on these threads, also consider themselves to be Christians...you just ignore that tho, choosing to believe something else...I will gladly ping PatrickHenry to delve into his ping list, he has accumulated more info on the evo posters, and he himself, has stated that most of those on his ping evo list, consider themselves Christian, with about 3-5 percent considering themselves to be atheists...you dont seem to like those statistics, and thus you chose to ignore them, and continue to call those who support evolution, as atheists...which is a fine example of misspeaking...





1,156 posted on 02/06/2006 5:17:52 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1155 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
A discussion with these evo guys is never in good faith.

They are johnny-one-notes and Asberger-obsessives...and a good way to avoid them is to enjoy all the other interesting FR conservative arguments going on that do not concern evolution. But they tend to be nasty little Girley-Men bullies, so it's a kindness to warn other freepers who might get caught up in their IM-coordinated two-minute gangups.

I've noticed that lately they stick mostly to talking to themselves, which is a kindness. I wonder why it has to be a public chat, though? They need an audience for their high-five parties? Then again, It probably gets lonely herding sheep up on that mountain.

1,157 posted on 02/07/2006 6:08:46 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
But they tend to be nasty little Girley-Men bullies, so it's a kindness to warn other freepers who might get caught up in their IM-coordinated two-minute gangups.

Thanks for the warning my friend and your fairly accurate assessment of the process. But this ain't my first rodeo...

They only talk amongst themselves nowadays because their secret handshake includes a signal for VI. </tinhat> Many of them throw a hissy fit and call troll when their adhominum, strawmen, suppressed evidence and hyperbole filled arguments are blasted out of the water. All the while feeding their E-trolls random bits of encouragement and even proudly including them on their ping lists to keep them rudely nipping away to discourage any would be C-poster who might actually be making a point on the subject.

It very obvious from this thread and others that many of them would rather embarrass their opponents in a "feeding frenzy" rather than agree to disagree or seek a graceful compromise.

It's hard to imagine the many of us who initially came to FR seeking common ground are treated with such disrespect and abuse by our so-called "conservative friends".

Thanks again for the post....
1,158 posted on 02/07/2006 7:08:36 AM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
In this forum, the rule is, you make a claim, you back it up. I learned that the first week I joined. Why do you think you are excepted from the rules?

There's a rule? Really? Where?

And since you've become the self appointed rule enforcer, try looking here and then you can really crack the whip on all those you find in this thread violating the actual FR rules for posting.

"I'll wait"... ;)

psssst.... try bullet points 3 and 5
1,159 posted on 02/07/2006 7:26:35 AM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1133 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
re: They only talk amongst themselves nowadays because their secret handshake includes a signal for VI.)))

Yep--Those Who Must Not Be Spoken To. I've repeatedly asked the ones who claim that they can't be addressed directly in a FR coversation on pain of banishment, to find some way to identify themselves--maybe with a tagline, "You're not allowed to speak to me," or some such.

Or perhaps the Ones Who May Not Speak to Those Who Must Not Be Spoken To can put together a database/spreadsheet for FR. It'd be interesting to see who is not allowed to speak, and who is not required to suffer to be spoken to.

Makes one think of Queens--Victoria and Elizabeth, that is--not to mention the Queen of Hearts.

1,160 posted on 02/07/2006 8:33:45 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1158 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
I've repeatedly asked the ones who claim that they can't be addressed directly in a FR coversation on pain of banishment, , to find some way to identify themselves

So you're telling me point blank that you have heard or been told that there if any of the DC pingers post directly to those on VI that they will be banished from the little boys and girls club?

You can't be series.... sounds like a highly principled group...

We'll put that theory to a test soon enough...
1,161 posted on 02/07/2006 8:50:28 AM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1160 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill

They threaten to hassle the mods. Trouble is, how does one remember them from one discussion to the next? They all spout the same lines, after all..."You need to go back to biology class" "Well, you obviously know nothing about Science"--regular clones.


1,162 posted on 02/07/2006 9:12:50 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1161 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Then we won't see you on these threads anymore? Doubtful.

You have some nerve calling me an atheist when you don't even know me. You lie, equivocate, and run when challenged to back up your assertions. Some servant of God you must be.

My best friend who happens to be a Christian minister thinks you guys are being mislead BIGTIME by the Master Of Lies. How else is it so easy for you to lie? Think about it.


1,163 posted on 02/07/2006 2:01:42 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1135 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill

You can argue how you like. If you want to be taken seriously here you back up your assertions.

I'll assume you pretend otherwise.


1,164 posted on 02/07/2006 2:05:35 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
psssst.... try bullet points 3 and 5

Would you like to tell me what you mean? Don't tell me I abused anyone. And point 5 has nothing to do with this discussion as I haven't posted anything in the wrong forum.

1,165 posted on 02/07/2006 2:08:19 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

I haven't run away from anything. I'm right here. Do you disagree that evolution in the public schools is an atheist agenda?

http://www.atheists.org/publicschools/pseudo.html

http://www.natcenscied.org/

Eugenie Scott - one of my favorite atheists.

There's more but I am getting ready to go home now.

Enjoy your evening.


1,166 posted on 02/07/2006 2:09:50 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1163 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow
That phrase tends to produce a nasty rash and night sweats among our elitist class.

Sure does. You can see it in the posts they put forth right here on FR.

1,167 posted on 02/07/2006 2:20:37 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Teaching the ToE is a scientific agenda. I don't care if athiests or Shiite Muslims or rodeo clowns or boating enthusiasts are for it. Logically, it doesn't change the facts.

Are you backing away from calling me an athiest now?


1,168 posted on 02/07/2006 2:26:39 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I take it then you do not give up. I guess it's a woman's prerogative to change her mind........


1,169 posted on 02/07/2006 2:28:16 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow
Darwinist Ideologues Are on the Run

LOL

1,170 posted on 02/07/2006 2:31:09 PM PST by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

The Muslims are anti-evolutionist. According to your logic, since you are against Muslims, you should be an evolutionist.


1,171 posted on 02/07/2006 2:44:08 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1145 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I think you are an athiest. Or you're a buddy of the Liar. Lies flow out of you like air.


1,172 posted on 02/07/2006 2:45:27 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1145 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Well, that depends. Do you believe the Bible is the inspired word of God?


1,173 posted on 02/07/2006 7:01:36 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1168 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Perhaps that is your logic but it isn't mine.


1,174 posted on 02/07/2006 7:02:27 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

If I have lied, I was not aware of it. But I await your pointing it out to me.


1,175 posted on 02/07/2006 7:03:21 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
If you want to be taken seriously here you back up your assertions.

You are the one who made this statement... So back it up... or stand down...

In this forum, the rule is, you make a claim, you back it up. I learned that the first week I joined. Why do you think you are excepted from the rules?

Where's the rule...
1,176 posted on 02/07/2006 7:55:37 PM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1164 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
If I have lied, I was not aware of it. But I await your pointing it out to me.

Easy. You have been told many times that evolution and atheism are not the same thing. Yet many of your posts continue to conflate the two, pretending that the millions of religious people who accept the theory of evolution don't exist. Doing this once could be an error. Doing it multiple times when the error has been pointed out is simply lying. You are a liar.

1,177 posted on 02/08/2006 9:45:37 AM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

If the atheist shoe fits....


1,178 posted on 02/08/2006 9:54:11 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1177 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

You are a bigger liar. Nah, nah, nah. LOL


1,179 posted on 02/08/2006 10:01:42 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1177 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

From you, "liar" is a compliment.


1,180 posted on 02/08/2006 11:45:13 AM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1179 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

Always happy to put a smile on an atheist's face.


1,181 posted on 02/08/2006 11:46:53 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1180 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Not all of it. Doesn't make me an atheist, just not a Christian.


1,182 posted on 02/09/2006 1:35:45 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill

I'm sorry, it's the unwritten rule. I was using it as an idiom.


1,183 posted on 02/09/2006 1:37:30 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1176 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

You accused Icky of disparaging believers in God, which is totally untrue.


1,184 posted on 02/09/2006 1:39:52 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

And I totally disagree with you.


1,185 posted on 02/09/2006 1:42:08 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1184 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Or has had solutes added. Freezing point depression.


1,186 posted on 03/12/2006 2:58:03 PM PST by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
If I have lied, I was not aware of it. But I await your pointing it out to me.

Have you forgotten? You have in the past ackwnowledged that you are "a creationist liar". Those were, in fact, your own words.
1,187 posted on 05/26/2006 4:03:40 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio; mlc9852

I somehow got bogged in reading this discussion after clicking a link to it in a recent discussion, and did not notice that I was reading an older topic when I came across your posting. I apologize for the necromancy.


1,188 posted on 05/26/2006 4:04:43 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 1,001-1,0501,051-1,1001,101-1,1501,151-1,188 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson