Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frgoff
You should send your links to this guy since he obviously hasn't gotten the word that transitional fossils are everywhere.

No need, since he acknowledges that transitional fossils are common. What hallucination led you to believe otherwise?

Oh, and follow up with the cellular researchers that say his theory has merit because they obviously are ignorant, too.

They aren't, and his theory is consistent with Darwinian evolution. Again, where did you get the delusion that it wasn't?

One more time -- why don't you toodle off and *learn* some biology before you attempt to critique it?

435 posted on 01/31/2006 6:08:25 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon
No need, since he acknowledges that transitional fossils are common.

From the article I linked:

"Rather, Schwartz argues, they have not been found because they don't exist..."

The initial point stands, your arrogant elitism notwithstanding.

562 posted on 02/01/2006 7:35:04 AM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson