Posted on 01/31/2006 3:44:11 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
ping
Pope's got a point there.
Democracy run by the left would be valueless and totalitarian.
Catholic Ping - Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
In a brief submitted to Parliament last year the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops presented their grave concerns over the proposal to legalize homosexual 'marriage'. When a society issues arbitrary laws that reject the primacy of natural law, the result is not only the risk of social chaos and disorder but, as the 20th century witnessed, a potential basis for state totalitarianism," said the brief.
Ping!
goes along with "Truth is not determined by a majority vote".
Must read for everyone bump.
A Decline in Courage [. . .]may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days. The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each political party and of course in the United Nations. Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the entire society. Of course there are many courageous individuals but they have no determining influence on public life. Political and intellectual bureaucrats show depression, passivity and perplexity in their actions and in their statements and even more so in theoretical reflections to explain how realistic, reasonable as well as intellectually and even morally warranted it is to base state policies on weakness and cowardice. And decline in courage is ironically emphasized by occasional explosions of anger and inflexibility on the part of the same bureaucrats when dealing with weak governments and weak countries, not supported by anyone, or with currents which cannot offer any resistance. But they get tongue-tied and paralyzed when they deal with powerful governments and threatening forces, with aggressors and international terrorists.
Should one point out that from ancient times decline in courage has been considered the beginning of the end?
When will we find the courage to rid ourselves of our traitors and domestic enemies?
ping
Unfortunately, churches have their own history of totalitarianism. Churches have often tried to gain political control to promote their own agendas. Democracy and the US Constitution does not define "heresy", "blasphemy", "infidels", "pagans". These are words used by churches to suppress free thought.
Atheists never burned anyone at the stake for being "apostates" or "witches". Religious leaders are not elected, and their claim to authority is not from democracy.
History shows that religious myths and authorities have done little to promote freedom of belief. They only want "freedom for their own".
The topic is democracy without values -not democracy without religion...
To phrase Theodore Roosevelt: "Knowledge without morals is dangerious."
I pray along with you. I am not even Catholic, but I love this man! The world is blessed to have yet another Godly Pope! I pray for his health and safely!
His words need to be heard loudly, far and wide.
"When will we find the courage to rid ourselves of our traitors and domestic enemies? "
We had better find it and soon!. Parents are pulling their kids out of public schools, more need to follow. And we better get mobilized and vote the socialists/communists/ homosexuals and their agenda, OUT of office, wherever they hold office.
later read.
Amen. The worldwide abortion holocaust and homosexual "marriage" movement are prime examples.
Why is "free thought" good? Are all ideas of equal value? Or are some true and some false? Can bad ideas lead to world wars and genocide? If so, why should people be free to spread these ideas?
Actually, that's not the point.
He was discussing the sort of value-free "democracy" increasingly practiced in Western Europe, where a minority gets to impose their preferences on a people because of some vague idea of democratic "egalitarianism."
Spain has had gay marriage imposed on it by a democratically elected leader who then immediately did the bidding of the gay leftist pressure groups. Not only did he make it legal, he provided no conscience clause for civil servants who objected to it - and there was plenty of objection to it - and essentially imposed it.
This completely ignores the fact that "gay marriage" is a new invention, completely undreamed of in any Spanish law on marriage and family, and violating the moral and social standards of most of the people in the country. But under the pretext of democratic equality, he was able to impose it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.