Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada's Islamist Seat
Front Page Magazine ^ | January 31, 2006 | Charlotte West

Posted on 01/31/2006 5:05:45 PM PST by fanfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: edzuk
A riding is Canada's equivalent of a congressional district.

There are currently 308 ridings in Canada. The number and boundaries are adjusted following each dicennial census. Each riding elects one member of parliament. There are also provincial ridings whose boundaries are most likely not the same as the federal ones. This is because the number of members of a provincial Legislature are usually different than the numbar of members that the Province sends to Ottaws. During the Harris government in Ontario, the number of provincial ridings were reduced to correspond to the number of federal ridings in the province and the riding boundaries were made the same. During the same mandate, The number of city council wards in Toronto were reduced to be twice the number of Toronto ridings.

This would not be practical for provinces with a small population because it would result in a Provincial legislature with too few members. The same with smaller cities and towns.

Clive

21 posted on 02/01/2006 7:18:25 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

I am glad to hear you are not one of THOSE Christians who find common ground with international Islam. I can find common ground with Judaism, since it is the foundation of the Christian faith. Islam was simply a cult that took off like wildfire, as it was seen as a means to unite an entire culture.

I have to admit that I adore military science. But I agree that no amount of science is going to save us from our own lack of vision and resolve.


22 posted on 02/01/2006 12:54:18 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: edzuk

I know it is confusing for Americans who are not familiar with Parliamentary systems. In my very humble opinion, your Republic is a superior system in the aim to reduce the power of government and secure the freedom of individuals - however, the Parliamentary form is far superior than the models that most European nations are built on. One exception may be the Swiss Confederacy. The Cantons have tremendous amount of power and independence. The one problem I have with the Swiss is the requirement to serve in the military. That seems to be a violation of individual rights.


23 posted on 02/01/2006 12:58:18 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ichabod_65

I read that Quebec has the largest Muslim population in all of North America. I believe it. Under the Liberals - ANYBODY could get in and the United States had every right to complain. I would go so far as to say that this guy may well be the head of a terrorist cell right in Toronto. There are likely many of them. One day he may walk into the halls of government with C-4 strapped to this waist under his three piece suit. One day, maybe Liberal Torontonians may wake up but it may be too late!! Absolutely incredible that this could take place in our country. However it has been quickly declining for 13 straight years.


24 posted on 02/01/2006 4:09:57 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (I want Western Canada to SEPARATE - Western Canadians CANNOT win in a corrupt system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Don't blame the Liberal for this one.

Liberal don't control Quebec immigrtion since they got their own ministtry of immigration (yes, the ONLY province).
Most of them came from north africa and haitia.


25 posted on 02/01/2006 4:14:00 PM PST by -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Good luck....I hope your successful....

You have a lot of these guys roaming around, least that's how it looked when my family and I went on a vacation to the more beautiful Canadian side of Niagara Falls.

Waterfall = lovily

Wandering sheets and beards w/ turbins = very scary.

26 posted on 02/01/2006 4:18:55 PM PST by thingumbob (Democracy is the best defense against terrorist/communist thugs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob
Good luck....I hope your successful....

Thanks, me too.

I don't have a burka, and have no plans to get one.

27 posted on 02/01/2006 4:23:17 PM PST by fanfan (Ask me how to do Folding@Home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Check out the conversation I'm having with paper tyger


28 posted on 02/01/2006 4:32:31 PM PST by ichabod_65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
It's probably going to get really ugly before it gets better.

Unfortunately your social health care, etc. ...... is the perfect honey to attract these Arab nationals....they live on hand outs in the middle east so why not in the west where they have more freedom to decent without the paying the high price of loosing their heads, hands, feet etc. if they tick off the wrong person like in their former homeland.

Start with your immigration policies and then with your social programs...turn the honey into vinegar and the bees fly away to find more favorable conditions elsewhere.

29 posted on 02/01/2006 4:36:03 PM PST by thingumbob (Democracy is the best defense against terrorist/communist thugs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
...however, the Parliamentary form is far superior than the models that most European nations are built on.

Most European nations do have a parliamentary form of government. Though republics w/ a parl. sys., the two notable exceptions would be France and Russia. They're semi-presidential; i.e. parliamentary-presidential but their respective presidents have considerable executive powers. Russian president even has the power to dissolve the Parliament at his own discretion.

Presidents in other Euro countries have a largely ceremonial post (i.e. representing the state internationally, receiving visiting dignitaries, cutting the ribbon, etc.).

30 posted on 02/01/2006 4:42:55 PM PST by Banat ("You've got two empty 'alves of coconut, and you're banging 'em together!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

I know that Super, but it was Quebec Liberals.


31 posted on 02/01/2006 5:01:30 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (I want Western Canada to SEPARATE - Western Canadians CANNOT win in a corrupt system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

I know that Super, but it was Quebec Liberals.


32 posted on 02/01/2006 5:01:33 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (I want Western Canada to SEPARATE - Western Canadians CANNOT win in a corrupt system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Banat
Isn't France on its 19th Republic? :) The fact France was built on the socialist blood letting of Danton and others, I am not confident that France is a free nation in any sense. Because Europe nations constantly rule under coalition I got the idea they were more proportional representation style governments.
33 posted on 02/01/2006 9:44:18 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
LOL! I think they're on the 5th, aren't they? :-)))

Euro countries have so many electoral systems (variations of proportional and majoritarian) that it would take me days to go through them all.

My personal preference is the proportional system - for obvious reasons. Those against it usually cite the near impossibility of a single-party government, which, according to them, leads to instability.

As far as single-member plurality systems (the UK, for example) I just can't see any fairness in the fact that one single party can have a majority of seats with only circa 30% of the voters behind it. Basically, 70% of the electorate represents a minority in Parliament. Go figure. Up here in Canada, they're toying with the idea of prop. representation. I am not holding my breath, though. The biggest losers would be the Liberals and the Conservatives. The NDP and the Greens would gain a lot.

34 posted on 02/02/2006 1:28:36 PM PST by Banat ("You've got two empty 'alves of coconut, and you're banging 'em together!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Banat
I'm Canadian as well. One of the reasons I dislike PR is that it would mean the NDP and Liberals would hold co-power and the conservatives would never hold power again.

I think the UK problem is that it is the sitting party's discretion to redraw the ridings. This works to Blair's benefit.
35 posted on 02/02/2006 3:14:01 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson