What's this about a tee-shirt being the reason she was removed from the House chambers. Initial reports last night said she had attempted to unfurl some kind of anti-war banner. Since unfurling a banner over the balcony of the House chambers is CLEARLY inappropriate behavior no matter who you are, I guess that act wouldn't allow the MSM to make a "1st Amendment issue" out of it.
Thus, overnight, history is revised so that the tee-shirt is the reason she was removed.
I used to think that "initial" news reports were usually less accurate than the "full" reports which come later, after the dust had settled on an issue or event. I no longer believe that. I now think the intial reports are often the closest to the truth, because they occur before the MSM filtering machine has had a chance to spin the story to match their strongly held beliefs or positions.
I objected to that too. I think there's a whitewash in progress.
Since unfurling a banner over the balcony of the House chambers is CLEARLY inappropriate behavior no matter who you are, I guess that act wouldn't allow the MSM to make a "1st Amendment issue" out of it.
Now that's inappropriate, I don't care who ya are! ;-)