1 posted on
02/01/2006 4:14:33 PM PST by
CAWats
To: CAWats
How can you 'spy' on a public protest?????
2 posted on
02/01/2006 4:16:31 PM PST by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: CAWats
These people are the Enemy Within and should be spied on...and charged with sedition and treason if applicable
3 posted on
02/01/2006 4:18:27 PM PST by
Ouderkirk
(Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
To: CAWats
I WANT THESE LAWYERS IN JAIL FOR SEDITION!!!!!
4 posted on
02/01/2006 4:20:31 PM PST by
Kewlhand`tek
(Those that can't , Teach. Those that can't teach , Report)
To: CAWats
Since ANSWER, one of the players associated with the "peace movement" has Hamas as a member - take a look at the protests in DC & San Fran - it seems to me that someone should be watching this.
I also wonder how you spy on a protest in public?
6 posted on
02/01/2006 4:24:22 PM PST by
Volunteer
(Just so you know, I am ashamed the Dixie Chicks make records in Nashville.)
To: CAWats
7 posted on
02/01/2006 4:25:42 PM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: CAWats
"Pay attention to meeeeeeee!"
8 posted on
02/01/2006 4:28:14 PM PST by
SkyPilot
To: CAWats
"... We're being seen as serious opposition."
No dear, your seen as a threat. Which anti-military protesters such as yourself are. Not only to our national security but also to the moral of our troops. So, pop that cranium on out of that rectum and return to what is commonly known as reality.
11 posted on
02/01/2006 4:40:26 PM PST by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: CAWats
We could give the bozos down at the aCLU this information but then we'd have to kill them. I SAY LET'S DO IT!!!!!!!
12 posted on
02/01/2006 4:44:50 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: CAWats
At a news conference in San Francisco, Leigh Johnson, 24, left, a student at UC Berkeley, and Kot Hordynski, 20, right, from UC Santa Cruz, discuss their potential for being monitored by the Pentagon.Kot Hordynski? Damnnn, what a bogus name Dude. You should like sue your parents man for physychical abuse or something Dude. Hey I gotta roll Hot Kor. My Origins of Surfing class started 10 minutes ago.
13 posted on
02/01/2006 4:45:11 PM PST by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
To: CAWats
This "complaint" by the ususal suspects reminds me entirely too much of the "public lactation" arguments, pro and con.
How many women publically breastfeeding are ending up on some pornie's website? eh?
The argument from ACLU et al, is just too "resemblematic".
15 posted on
02/01/2006 4:52:03 PM PST by
Alia
To: CAWats
ACLU:
Hardly Civil and protecting NO liberties! Just taking liberties.
24 posted on
02/02/2006 8:35:39 AM PST by
jw777
To: CAWats
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/world/espionage_and_intelligence
By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer
22 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - CIA Director Porter Goss said Thursday that the disclosure of President Bush's eavesdropping-without-warrants program and other once-secret projects had undermined U.S. intelligence-gathering abilities.
"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss told the Senate Intelligence Committee. He said a federal grand jury should be empaneled to determine "who is leaking this information."
His testimony came after National Intelligence Director John Negroponte, who directs all intelligence activities, strongly defended the program, calling it crucial for protecting the nation against its most menacing threat......."
To: CAWats
ACLU ....the Lead Leftist Hate America outfit spawned by Red Communists.....see this
********************************************
Unholy Alliance : Radical Islam and the American Left
And a very good review:
*********************************
Vastly Illuminating, September 25, 2004
I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.
It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.
Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.
This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson