Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Building An American Future Means Rejecting the "Davos Culture"
AmericanEconomicAlert.org ^ | Wednesday, February 01, 2006 | William R. Hawkins

Posted on 02/02/2006 6:40:03 AM PST by Willie Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Willie Green

'regardless of country of origin' ?? What incentive would such a strategy have to make China behave any differently?


61 posted on 02/03/2006 1:20:45 PM PST by VoodooEconomics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

So it was DOUBLY as painful!


62 posted on 02/03/2006 1:21:22 PM PST by VoodooEconomics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: VoodooEconomics
What incentive would such a strategy have to make China behave any differently?

None.
China is a sovereign nation with the right to self-determination and peacefully pursue their own policies.
They are capable of changing their own behavior.
We can lead by example, not by coercive "incentives".

63 posted on 02/03/2006 1:30:11 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: VoodooEconomics
'regardless of country of origin' ?? What incentive would such a strategy have to make China behave any differently?

This peels away some of the financial advantage the PRC would have to continue their economic strip-mining operation. I personally believe that this a fair proposal, but I recommend a 25% general revenue tariff. And in tandem, eliminating the Income Tax (corporate and personal, and capital gains)...and we instead go with a parallel National Sales tax of 15% to replace it. This punishes consumption of the foreign manufactures, rewarding domestic production, and creating incentives for savings and investment here in the U.S.

Meanwhile, since China is scofflaw on so many areas of their requirements to the WTO, we should simply commence things with a bang with them, and simply remove MFN status. Now. No ifs, no buts. No talking about. Just do it.

The legal effect of that is the immediate application of the still-good-law Smoot-Hawley Tariff. Without MFN status of some kind they would have an automatic 50% tariff slapped on their goods. That should pretty much shut down most (not all of) the rush to go to China. In fact it might have the effect of returning about $600 billion of production outsourced.

Meanwhile, all IMF, OPIC and ExIm Bank U.S. government subsidies for all further China relocation / 'investment' activities by US firms would be immediately cancelled.

64 posted on 02/03/2006 1:36:58 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

btt


65 posted on 02/03/2006 10:36:03 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson