Skip to comments.Jed Babbin: Rockefeller IS the source of the leak on the NSA wiretaps..will he take a polygraph?
Posted on 02/03/2006 8:47:20 PM PST by ken5050
Turned on the radio, happened to catch the last segment of the John Batchelor show. He was interviewing Jeb Babbin....who many of us know and respect, and read his columns. I was absolutely stunned by what Babbin just said...hadn't seen/heard it anywheres..and thought it merits reposting for your benefit....
Maybe somebody on the Levin threads knows...............who listens and posts?
SoCalPol listens to Mark every day.
I listed to Mark Levin from 3-5 everyday. Check out
the live thread and also the site MARKLEVINFAN has back
files of his programs
It does not matter if the person is an elected official.
A crime is a crime. And a senator, who willfully discloses classified info, is subject to the same penalties as anyone else.
That is what our democracy is supposed to be about - both equal protection and equal prosecution and conviction.
So, I say, we should convict and hang the bast##ds!
Yeah the picture that it congers up is revolting. This will be very interesting and that thread should be pretty informative. I will bet that "Mr Potato head" Tim Russert does not bring it up on his show, and I would be willing to bet that the other liberal biased Shows don't either.
and I heard him actually say, on TV, that when the Syrian leader expressed doubts that Bush would really attack, (neither he nor Saddam thought the US had the guts too - and Saddam had his buddies - Russia, France and Germany, all on the take with the oil/food program - who assured him they wouldn't let an attack okay thru' the UN - was strutting and posturing. But Rockefeller proudly said that he, himself, assured Syria that Bush WAS going to attack. This is when Saddam got busy and trucked/flew the WMD into Syria.
So - why isn't what Rockefeller did treason?
Mark was talking about a letter that has been written and signed by a bunch of ex-Clintonistas, lawyers, ex-intell. and such, that will be admitted into evidence next week...
Of course, it is totally anti-Bush...even though their boss, Clinton did the same thing...and some of them even argued for Clinton's right to do it..
Mark gave a website to get the full text of the letter, but I didn't think to write it down, and I don't remember.
Probably the best person to ask about this would be AliVeritas...if she was listnening...because she keeps everthing for further use.
Will the real "Culture of Coruption" please stand up!
Hopefully, Chris Wallace will talk about it on Fox...but, if he doesn't, no one will.
she keeps "everything?"
"The administration is not sure how to proceed. Babbin doesn't think they have the guts to indict a US senator. He said it would cause a battle royal on the Hill, if not a constitutional crisis.
If they don't now, on this, they might as well forget about ever trying to any thing else.
They gave all the Clinton corruption a pass.
Jay Rockerfeller was also the Senator who made a fast trip to Syria and the ME not long before the invasion of Iraq, too."
I'm a firm believer in a test of: Reverse the facts and the party affiliations. If the Dems were sitting in the Republican's places, would they indict? If the answer is yes, then our answer sure as hell should also be YES! The main reason that the Pubbies lose many times is that we always feel like we must play "by the rules." The Dims have no such compunctions!
Seems to me that if even the non-relevant (neutral) questions are not disclosed, the subject would show more stress than would normally be shown if the the neutral question(s) were known beforehand.
I think non-disclosure would be responsible for establishing a false baseline and could possibly cloak 'control' question stress -- assuming that they would use control questions. Some do and some don't.
Any truth examiners out there agree with that?
The line is, "Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"
yeah, or maybe batman.
This is from Mark Levin Fan's site, he is a grreat source.
He has the sound bits also along with the back programs
She posts links to the most articles of anyone that I have seen on FR...and they are all really good.
However, if she didn't, then MarkLevinFan should have a recording of Mark's show to get the information off of.
Im turning in....see ya manana..if you see/find anything on the Levin reference..please ping me..
But if you pass a lie detector pass, you have less a chance of being prosecuted, unless they have other much more damning evidence.
Which is why we will see the DNC offering classes for their members on "How to properly take a lie detector test...And Pass!"
For the swimmer there will be a Cliff Notes version.
Yeah...I gotta go to bed also...I will let you know, what, if anything I find this weekend.
didn't I hear that Leahy was, in the 90's, on the security council, but was kicked off for leaking classified info?
(should've gone to jail, IMO, - but the libs are never held accountable. And the pubs are crucified and destroyed over false accusations.