Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jed Babbin: Rockefeller IS the source of the leak on the NSA wiretaps..will he take a polygraph?
John Batchelor program..WABC radio

Posted on 02/03/2006 8:47:20 PM PST by ken5050

Turned on the radio, happened to catch the last segment of the John Batchelor show. He was interviewing Jeb Babbin....who many of us know and respect, and read his columns. I was absolutely stunned by what Babbin just said...hadn't seen/heard it anywheres..and thought it merits reposting for your benefit....


TOPICS: US: West Virginia; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; babbin; batchelor; jayrockefeller; jedbabbin; johnbatchelor; leaks; nsa; spying; talkradio; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-240 next last
To: ken5050

Maybe somebody on the Levin threads knows...............who listens and posts?


101 posted on 02/03/2006 9:37:40 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol; ken5050


SoCalPol listens to Mark every day.


102 posted on 02/03/2006 9:38:43 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I listed to Mark Levin from 3-5 everyday. Check out
the live thread and also the site MARKLEVINFAN has back
files of his programs


103 posted on 02/03/2006 9:39:31 PM PST by SoCalPol (Cowards Cut and Run, Marines Never Do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

It does not matter if the person is an elected official.

A crime is a crime. And a senator, who willfully discloses classified info, is subject to the same penalties as anyone else.

That is what our democracy is supposed to be about - both equal protection and equal prosecution and conviction.

So, I say, we should convict and hang the bast##ds!


104 posted on 02/03/2006 9:40:39 PM PST by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Yeah the picture that it congers up is revolting. This will be very interesting and that thread should be pretty informative. I will bet that "Mr Potato head" Tim Russert does not bring it up on his show, and I would be willing to bet that the other liberal biased Shows don't either.


105 posted on 02/03/2006 9:41:12 PM PST by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Jay Rockerfeller was also the Senator who made a fast trip to Syria and the ME not long before the invasion of Iraq, too

and I heard him actually say, on TV, that when the Syrian leader expressed doubts that Bush would really attack, (neither he nor Saddam thought the US had the guts too - and Saddam had his buddies - Russia, France and Germany, all on the take with the oil/food program - who assured him they wouldn't let an attack okay thru' the UN - was strutting and posturing. But Rockefeller proudly said that he, himself, assured Syria that Bush WAS going to attack. This is when Saddam got busy and trucked/flew the WMD into Syria.

So - why isn't what Rockefeller did treason?

106 posted on 02/03/2006 9:43:33 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; AliVeritas

Mark was talking about a letter that has been written and signed by a bunch of ex-Clintonistas, lawyers, ex-intell. and such, that will be admitted into evidence next week...

Of course, it is totally anti-Bush...even though their boss, Clinton did the same thing...and some of them even argued for Clinton's right to do it..

Mark gave a website to get the full text of the letter, but I didn't think to write it down, and I don't remember.

Probably the best person to ask about this would be AliVeritas...if she was listnening...because she keeps everthing for further use.


107 posted on 02/03/2006 9:44:56 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Will the real "Culture of Coruption" please stand up!


108 posted on 02/03/2006 9:46:24 PM PST by CAluvdubya (The ignorant defeatocrats have declared war on the War On Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: samantha

Hopefully, Chris Wallace will talk about it on Fox...but, if he doesn't, no one will.


109 posted on 02/03/2006 9:47:20 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

she keeps "everything?"


110 posted on 02/03/2006 9:47:37 PM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

"The administration is not sure how to proceed. Babbin doesn't think they have the guts to indict a US senator. He said it would cause a battle royal on the Hill, if not a constitutional crisis.

If they don't now, on this, they might as well forget about ever trying to any thing else.

They gave all the Clinton corruption a pass.

Jay Rockerfeller was also the Senator who made a fast trip to Syria and the ME not long before the invasion of Iraq, too."


I'm a firm believer in a test of: Reverse the facts and the party affiliations. If the Dems were sitting in the Republican's places, would they indict? If the answer is yes, then our answer sure as hell should also be YES! The main reason that the Pubbies lose many times is that we always feel like we must play "by the rules." The Dims have no such compunctions!


111 posted on 02/03/2006 9:47:56 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Certain "validating" questions may be asked without prior disclosure to establish a baseline from which the examiners can judge the validity of the answers to the relevant questions."

Seems to me that if even the non-relevant (neutral) questions are not disclosed, the subject would show more stress than would normally be shown if the the neutral question(s) were known beforehand.

I think non-disclosure would be responsible for establishing a false baseline and could possibly cloak 'control' question stress -- assuming that they would use control questions. Some do and some don't.

Any truth examiners out there agree with that?

112 posted on 02/03/2006 9:48:19 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Philistone
"Who will not rid me of this turbulent priest!" Sorry,my favorite CYA line of all time.

The line is, "Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"

113 posted on 02/03/2006 9:48:55 PM PST by M. Thatcher ( I truly hope for two things before I die. The death of the Democrat Party, and the death of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

yeah, or maybe batman.


114 posted on 02/03/2006 9:49:00 PM PST by Treader (Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

This is from Mark Levin Fan's site, he is a grreat source.
He has the sound bits also along with the back programs




The forces of good vs. the forces of appeasement
Thursday, Mark discussed a confrontation in the Senate Intelligence Committee today.

Tim Sumner provided the following summary:

Journalists undermining our country unprecedented

Last night, Mark Levin pointedly took an AP reporter to task for obvious interjecting a slant and prefacing a report with, “Eavesdropping without warrants program,” in her lead paragraph. She was ”reporting” on administration officials testifying before Congress and the NSA Surveillance Program. ”Let’s stop right there,” Mark said and then added:

“Katherine Shrader, you’re the reporter for the Associated Press. ‘Eavesdropping without warrants program’ is not what it is. Its ‘intercepting enemy communications program’ and maybe if you had lost someone on 9/11, maybe if your family or friends were affected by that, maybe you wouldn’t write such left-wing propaganda that puts a very honorable and legitimate program in such a bad light.”

Mark went on to do what Ms. Shrader and others often do not: report what happened. He finished reading her “report” of administration official’s testimony, representation of the give and take, and post-hearings reactions from various members of Congress.

Then Mark did what pundits and editorial boards are free people to do, he weighed in:


They put politics before preventing another 9/11!

by MarkLevinFan @ 10:31 pm.
Filed under Mark Levin Audio
[


115 posted on 02/03/2006 9:50:25 PM PST by SoCalPol (Cowards Cut and Run, Marines Never Do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

She posts links to the most articles of anyone that I have seen on FR...and they are all really good.

However, if she didn't, then MarkLevinFan should have a recording of Mark's show to get the information off of.


116 posted on 02/03/2006 9:50:34 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Im turning in....see ya manana..if you see/find anything on the Levin reference..please ping me..

g'night


117 posted on 02/03/2006 9:50:45 PM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Not to be a skunk at the party, but lie detector results are not admissable in court, which means there is reasonable doubt as to their efficacy.

But if you pass a lie detector pass, you have less a chance of being prosecuted, unless they have other much more damning evidence.

Which is why we will see the DNC offering classes for their members on "How to properly take a lie detector test...And Pass!"

For the swimmer there will be a Cliff Notes version.

118 posted on 02/03/2006 9:52:52 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Yeah...I gotta go to bed also...I will let you know, what, if anything I find this weekend.


119 posted on 02/03/2006 9:52:52 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: samantha
Leahy has the same problem, he always looks guilty,but he probably did pee on the Carpet.

didn't I hear that Leahy was, in the 90's, on the security council, but was kicked off for leaking classified info?

(should've gone to jail, IMO, - but the libs are never held accountable. And the pubs are crucified and destroyed over false accusations.

120 posted on 02/03/2006 9:56:16 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson