Skip to comments.Jed Babbin: Rockefeller IS the source of the leak on the NSA wiretaps..will he take a polygraph?
Posted on 02/03/2006 8:47:20 PM PST by ken5050
Turned on the radio, happened to catch the last segment of the John Batchelor show. He was interviewing Jeb Babbin....who many of us know and respect, and read his columns. I was absolutely stunned by what Babbin just said...hadn't seen/heard it anywheres..and thought it merits reposting for your benefit....
Maybe we can give him that extra shove he seems to need!
If this "Senator" is the leak, he should be impeached.
The shove that WVA voters should have given him long ago.
MB..can you please confirm what Babbin said..as I reported it...that refusal is an automatic loss of security clearance,a nd that Babbin specifically mentioned Rockefeler, Durbin ,and Wyden..
Keeper says hi to Tucker and glad to hear he is
feeling well tonight.
Just keeping Keeper off my projects here at the computer
I'm blurry eyed .. but it sounds like they can't be forced to take one
I still wonder what the exact rules for the Senate Intel are
Also .. after the hearing yesterday .. Rockefeller, Feinstein and Wyden were in a little pow wow with a couple of staffer .. though there wasn't a mic and I couldn't tell what they were saying
When Rockefeller made that statement about the Executive Branch probably was the source of the leak, he was slapped down by FBI Director, Robert Mueller, since as he said the Justise Dept was a part of the Executive Branch and Rockefeller had no evidence that the Executive Branch was the source. Mueller was pissed and Jay "LEAKER"(Traitor) Rockefeller had to back down.
As you may recall, the NY Slimes treasonous article even mentions Rockefeller having doubts about the program. Rockefeller was not even to discuss this classified NATIONAL SECURITY Program with his staff. Yea, Rockefeller was one of the leakers.
LOL...this is gonna be SO much fun...I did watch Gonzalez tonight on Brit's show...and he didn't look like he felt guilty about anything...
and judging from that way that President Bush is purposely bringing up the subject, I think he feels on pretty solid footing as well..
BTW...Leahy DOES pee on the carpet..because he is "leaky" Leahy.
Rockefeller's pointing at the executive branch (a.k.a. WH) seemed to me completely gratuitous. He gave no reason whatsoever for his allegation.
I thought you would. Keep us posted, this will be hugh I am sure. That was a good heads up play.
Tucker thinks he likes pizza, nearly drove us nuts trying to get some!
So, think this will finally do ol' Rockefeller in? (rubbing hands together in anticipation)
Since when do these Dems ever give a reason whatsoever for their allegations.
I can inagine trying to nail Rockerfeller on this one. The Libs will go WILD , Bush Nazi tactics , blah lbah blah
Rockefeller was right, the Executive Branch told Rockefeller (and other Congresscritters) then Rockefeller leaked to the Press. Ultimate source the Executive Branch.
That's what I was looking for, but I couldn't find it.
Isn't there one called CODE?
I don't know the rules and laws that govern the Senate Intelligence Committee...but, you and I both see that according to the Senators...
THEY are untouchable...whereas President Bush has to justify every move he makes.
I would not put rockefeller above treason. he considers himself above the law, like clinton (both) and kennedy.
Off topic a tad...but did anyone hear Mark Levin tonight? I caught a few minutes..He was discussing some memomrandum that a Cinto DoJ atty wrote in 1994 ( and the guy has now written something attacking Bush about the NSA wiretaps)back then he said that the president.( Clinton) has the absolute authority to IGNORE any act of Congress that impedes his constitutional authority...anyone have any info?
Rocky and the rest of his ilk need to be exposed and
this corruption montra the dems are on needs to be
turned around where it belongs.