Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Teaches Troops How to Pick a Spouse
http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/02/04/319128.html&cvqh=itn&ts=2006.02.04_ ^ | 2 4 06 | PAULINE JELINEK

Posted on 02/04/2006 5:41:48 AM PST by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: television is just wrong

Indeed..


41 posted on 02/04/2006 11:20:21 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Hey, as a jerk in good standing, I'm calling 'foul!'


42 posted on 02/04/2006 11:20:50 AM PST by HitmanLV (Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
The military is worried about the divorce rate so it blames the spouses instead of the year long deployments???

Believe me, it is very badly needed. The majority of the problems in a lot of these guys' marriages is due to their utter inability to choose a good woman.

Case in point, I have a Soldier who is determined to marry a woman whom he has known for 6 weeks and who has already cheated on him with an ex-boyfriend (she said he forced himself on her, but she still has feelings for him so she won't press charges...gotta remember that one...). This class sounds like a very good idea, I hope it gets implemented here ASAP.

43 posted on 02/04/2006 11:39:11 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I don't think guys are reading Teen Magazine


44 posted on 02/04/2006 11:57:33 AM PST by Vision ("There are no limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
It used to be; "If the Army wants you to have a wife they'll issue you one!"

Now it looks like they almost are. Every issue item comes with classes from how to select, to how to maintain, so now.....

I guess they have to now. Since President Bush signed into law the UCMJ rule that visiting a prostitute, even in countries where it's legal, is now an Article 134 offense, punishable by up to a year in prison, a fine, and a dishonorable discharge. I guess in the military, if you want sex, you had better be married.

Mark

45 posted on 02/04/2006 1:00:08 PM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Maybe a few more Bible based Chaplains might really solve this problem? At times I truly believe you need supernatural strength to navigate out there. Ooops, I forgot. They can't even pray in His name so as not to offend people.


46 posted on 02/04/2006 1:06:54 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Anyone notice that this article says nothing about The Marines.

Semper Fidelis It's more then just a motto it's a way of life.

25 years and counting


47 posted on 02/04/2006 1:15:04 PM PST by usmcobra (I'm a Marine on currently on inactive status awaiting an eternal change of duty station)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
I guess they have to now. Since President Bush signed into law the UCMJ rule that visiting a prostitute, even in countries where it's legal, is now an Article 134 offense, punishable by up to a year in prison, a fine, and a dishonorable discharge. I guess in the military, if you want sex, you had better be married.

Article 134 is a pretty wide net and covers everything from using indecent language to not paying your bills to cohabitation to negligent homicide. Technically speaking, any sexual activity other than the missionary position between husband and wife falls under the UCMJ. Sodomy (defined to include oral sex), even within marriage, is in violation of Article 125 and can lead to 5 years imprisonment.

Of course, the military (like real life) enforces some violations more stringently than others. Nobody is going to Leavenworth for receiving a hummer from their wife and it is equally unlikely that sailors and soldiers will cease patronizing prostitutes.

See Punitive Articles of the UCMJ for some interesting information.

48 posted on 02/04/2006 1:35:14 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

bump for later


49 posted on 02/04/2006 1:43:58 PM PST by jamaly (I evacuate early and often!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
The military is worried about the divorce rate so it blames the spouses instead of the year long deployments???



The year long deployments do not help but they are not the root of the real problem in a military marriage. I have seen a lot of young women who think it is romantic to marry a soldier(he looks soooo good in his uniform)but they have no idea what it really means to be married to the military-which is what you are doing when you marry a soldier, airman or marine.
50 posted on 02/04/2006 2:21:19 PM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
The military is worried about the divorce rate so it blames the spouses instead of the year long deployments???

The concept of "sacrifice" is lost on far too many military spouses. There are many perks to being a military spouse but there are sacrifices that must be made as well. Nothing is for free.

51 posted on 02/04/2006 2:23:50 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"...against sluts and gays."

And gold-diggers.


52 posted on 02/04/2006 2:27:27 PM PST by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Since President Bush signed into law the UCMJ rule that visiting a prostitute, even in countries where it's legal, is now an Article 134 offense,

Congress would have to pass that rule as well, because the UCMJ is part of federal law.

53 posted on 02/04/2006 4:05:15 PM PST by El Gato (The Second Amendment is the Reset Button of the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
As we got into the terminal with our three little kids in tow, she looked at the pandemonium and looked at me and almost lost it. I gently grabbed her shoulders and said "Baby, you are an Army wife, I need you to act like one." She took a half step backwards blinked hard, and said "what needs to be done?" I told her to get some dinner for the family, and meet me back there when she was finished. I went and found what turned out to be a midnight flight home. (even after that she brought me something to eat.)

Beautiful story. Sounds like you are a very fortunate man. Hooooah!

54 posted on 02/04/2006 4:38:17 PM PST by Looking4Truth (http://www.gunstuff.com/america-attacked.html - NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Reminds me of the cartoon strip of the teenage kid asking his Grandfather what he did for safe sex when he was young as Grandpa was reading the paper. Grandpa never stopped reading his paper but just held up his left hand and showed the wedding ring.


55 posted on 02/04/2006 6:51:23 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

You nailed it. My girlfriend from high-school put a lot of pressure on me to get married. I had seen enough during my first couple of years in the Navy to know better...I came back from my second deployment and she was engaged to someone else. The VHA/BAS was attractive, I was ship's company on the Saratoga out at Mayport and living on the ship really sux.


56 posted on 02/04/2006 7:05:57 PM PST by SC Swamp Fox (Bush lied, people dyed....their fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson