Skip to comments.
IS THE PRESIDENT “ABOVE THE LAW”? I GUESS IT DEPENDS ON WHO THE PRESIDENT IS
National Review ^
| Feb. 4, 2006
| Andy McCarthy
Posted on 02/04/2006 6:21:23 AM PST by conservativecorner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: conservativecorner
So, does anyone actually ask these people about their inconsistencies? No, of course not, silly me.
2
posted on
02/04/2006 6:24:31 AM PST
by
reformed_dem
(You can't make me)
To: navynucmom; Repub4bush; rightinthemiddle; andyk; defconw; tiredoflaundry; sono; RasterMaster; ...
3
posted on
02/04/2006 6:26:32 AM PST
by
AliVeritas
(The Espionage Act of 1917... It's time to use it.)
To: conservativecorner
Glad they are getting caught in their hypocrisy.
4
posted on
02/04/2006 6:27:07 AM PST
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: conservativecorner
Thanks CC, we were waiting for this last night.
5
posted on
02/04/2006 6:27:25 AM PST
by
AliVeritas
(The Espionage Act of 1917... It's time to use it.)
To: conservativecorner
Keeping this alive just perpetuates Bush hate.
We are at war.
They have vowed to strike us again.
If anyone objects to us using these means to defend our homeland, they are siding with our enemy.
There will be reprisals. Count on it.
6
posted on
02/04/2006 6:28:42 AM PST
by
CBart95
To: reformed_dem
Several former Clinton administration officials...Credibility immediately lost!
7
posted on
02/04/2006 6:30:46 AM PST
by
Northern Yankee
(Freedom Needs A Soldier)
To: conservativecorner
Rep. Carl Levin is on FOX now badmouthing Bush's efforts
to protect us? He thinks the Pres. broke the law by listening to overseas phone calls. We can predict what these Democrats are going to say about anything related to Pres. Bush. Democrats have one playbook called hate and bash Bush, but, never offering a better way. Tell us Rep. Levin, what is the better way? Levin is not capable of telling us something new, something different, something workable to stop another terrorist attack. He is attending the Superbowl with one playbook called Bush hatred.
To: conservativecorner
Want to lock up 10's of thousands of Japanese citizens during WWII? No problem.
Want to wiretap a citizen who's a civil rights leader? No problem.
Want to execute a warrantless search on Aldridge Ames? No problem.
Want to wiretap international calls from suspected terrorists to their U.S. cells? Big problem.
I guess you just have to be in the 'right' party to do whatever the he!! you want. Freakin' hypocrites!
9
posted on
02/04/2006 6:39:25 AM PST
by
Bob
To: conservativecorner
fail[ed] to identify any plausible legal authority for the NSA program that does not comply with the warrant procedure mandated by Congress in FISA"
I can do it in 30 secs. USSID 18 4.1(b).
4.1 (S-CCO) Communications which are known to be to, from or about U.S. PERSONS oxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx not be intentionally intercepted. [1 line redacted.]
a. With the approval of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court under the conditions outlined in Annex A of this USSID.
b. With the approval of the Attorney General of the United States, if:
(1) The COLLECTION is directed against the following:
(a) Communications to or from U.S. PERSONS outside of the UNITED STATES, or
(b) International communications to, from, [1 line redacted.]
(c) Communications which are not to or from but merely about U.S. PERSONS (wherever located).
(2) The person is an AGENT OF A FOREIGN POWER, and
(3) The purpose of the COLLECTION is to acquire significant FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE information.
http://web.elastic.org/~fche/mirrors/www.jya.com/nsa-ussid18.htm#SECTION%204
10
posted on
02/04/2006 6:42:15 AM PST
by
xusafflyer
(Mexifornian by birth, Hoosier by choice.)
To: Bob
Want to lock up 10's of thousands of Japanese citizens during WWII? No problem. That doesn't quite sound like I meant it. Should have read: "10's of thousands of U.S. citizens who happened to be of Japanese descent".
11
posted on
02/04/2006 6:42:24 AM PST
by
Bob
To: Bob
Add one more to the list in regards to the hipocrisy of the left:
Enter a private citizen's home by force, and confiscate a young Cuban boy, and return him to Cuba.
No problem there.
To: Northern Yankee
Hard to believe that Dems would try to drum up a lame non-story just to damage Bush--oh wait that's all they do.
13
posted on
02/04/2006 6:46:17 AM PST
by
Callahan
To: Callahan
LOL...
That's why they'll continue to lose elections.
To: conservativecorner
"...the Bush administration had fail[ed] to identify any plausible legal authority for the NSA program..."Is it possible that there is no controlling legal authority?
15
posted on
02/04/2006 6:49:38 AM PST
by
OldEagle
(May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
To: Revererdrv
If so many innocent people would not be hurt and destroyed financially, I would tell the President to just stop any effort of keep this country safe, and let the fool's (dems) be destroyed by the enemy.
If they think that this vitriolic spewing is going to get them any more voters and power, they are sadly mistaken.
16
posted on
02/04/2006 6:53:58 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: conservativecorner
Not having adequately demonstrated their foolishness during the Alito hearings, they are going for broke with the NSA issue. There really must be some sort of party wide death wish among the dems.
17
posted on
02/04/2006 6:54:18 AM PST
by
Bahbah
(An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
To: Northern Yankee
How about adding Waco and Ruby Ridge to the list?
18
posted on
02/04/2006 6:55:19 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: Bob
***Should have read: "10's of thousands of U.S. citizens who happened to be of Japanese descent".***
Don't forget, FDR also locked up THOUSANDS of German-American CITIZENS and Italian-American CITIZENS in his little 'summer camps' and they too lost everything, i.e.; confiscated by the gubmint.
But being that Germans and Italians aren't FREAKING WHINERS, nobody remembers that. Plus they where white, so who gives a shiite. /s
19
posted on
02/04/2006 6:58:49 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
To: mariabush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson