Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExSoldier

To quibble, those weren't suicide bombers, just bombers. Spain had serious potential for regime change regardless - the effect had less to do with the bombings than with the government's response to the bombings.

The strategic goal was to weaken international support for US ops in Iraq - and they were already pretty weak.

More to the point, Peters argues the suicide bombers are so effective that a modern military cannot cope with them, and therefor a modern military does not need modern military equipment. Fortunately, I believe his views will be about as strategically effective as the suicide bombers - convincing only those who are already convinced.


27 posted on 02/06/2006 9:51:37 AM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Yes, you are quibbling and I'm not going to respond to you on those, because you know it's a weak case...else why would you admit to quibbling? lol As to the rest:

Peters argues the suicide bombers are so effective that a modern military cannot cope with them, and therefor a modern military does not need modern military equipment.

I don't think Peters is saying any such thing. He makes an astute point that our military senior leadership wants the next sexy weapons system to fight their classic war and that scenario is growing ever more remote....well unless you throw China into the mix and even then it won't be tanks and infantry. Believe me, speaking as a former Armor Officer, that hurt to write!

It is the age of asymmetrical warfare. The most effective force in dealing with this form of terrorist (I refuse to give them the dignity of calling them insurgents) is the SpecOps community. Unfortunately, there aren't very many of them....partly owing to the push for sexy new weapons systems (and the fact that the military establishment HATES special forces). Also, the type of individual who will sacrifice to join and train is a rare breed. So we need to use them more effectively. We also need to get our heads out of our fourth point of contact and admit that what the enemies true objectives are and understand that dealing with those objectives will require some unpleasant self examination.

#1 We have to stop facilitating our own victimization! We have to close our borders and make hiring an illegal worker a worse pain than hiring a wage earner that you have to actually pay the minimum wage!

#2 We have to get free from oil addiction...especially to middle eastern and south American sources. That means either alternative energy or we drill off the coast of Florida/Louisiana/Texas AND up in Alaska and we drill it like a $10 Hooker!!

#3 We have to reach the inescapable conclusion that countries that sponsor terrorists are not our friends and must be handled accordingly. This will be easier if we're not kissing their collective A$$ in buying their oil!

What does this mean to our military? Maintain the heavy divisions but push the SpecOps recruitment and force structure. Put the covert agencies hand in hand with SpecOps and go back to the days of undercover "wet work" against our enemy. I suspect we're already doing this.

28 posted on 02/06/2006 11:34:52 AM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson