Posted on 02/06/2006 6:34:20 AM PST by bikepacker67
How can you saw that ?!!!
Football is just as honest as is my sport, Brother !!!
>>I thought there were some real bad calls in the game.
Me, too, and I didn't have a dog in that fight.
Yesterday's rancid officiating has nothing to do with baseball. :)
Were I a Seahawk fan, I'd be wild. Since I'm not, I'm just shaking my head. I think this column is a little over the top, but years ago Bud Grant led the call for full-time officials and it seems valid to me.
Refs were far from Super in this one ^ |
||
Posted by RedBloodedAmerican On News/Activism ^ 02/06/2006 9:50:28 AM EST msn sports ^ | 2.06.2006 | Kevin Hench / FOXSports.com This is the space where I get to crow about the frightening precision of my Super Bowl prediction. Where I get to remind everyone that I guaranteed the Steelers would win the title after they beat the Colts. That they were the only championship-caliber team among the final four. That they would dismantle the Broncos in Denver and waylay whomever the NFC sent at them.snip I've never felt so empty being right. I feel dirty. I wish I'd been wrong. The Steelers did not deserve to win this game. They were not the better team. O'Connor was right. Seattle was... |
||
|
Pittsburg got almost all the questionable calls. My thought was maybe the refs had about $100K bet on the under for all the drives they killed.
Seahawks fans after Super Bowk XL = Gore Supporters after 2000 election
It was a very dull game. I was doing other things around the house, and only casually watching it.
Close ain't the word. That was practically splitting atoms. But it was real enough.
No, that was a correct call. If a receiver pushes off with a stiff arm to get separation to catch the ball, that is offensive pass interference. Without the pushoff, his move might have been enough to get open for the pass, but probably not. Most likely, the defensive back is close enough to knock the ball down had the receiver not pushed off. That call was absolutely correct, and I can't believe that both Irvin and Steve Young sat there and said otherwise. Irvin knows that is offensive pass interference as he got away with it a lot of times and also got called for it a lot of times. In fact, later in his career he couldn't get away with it because he had gained so much notoriety for his skill on the pushoff move. You can complain about the block below the waist call hen Hasselbeck made the tackle on the play, and I'm surprised that the coaches weren't able to successfully talk the ref out of that bad call, but the offensive pass interference call was a good call.
And the seahawks benefited from some bad calls themselves. Like the completed pass that was fumbled after two steps that was whistled dead as an incomplete pass. If the ref lets that one play out like he should have, the Steelers pick up the fumble and probably return it to mid-field. All in all, there were some missed calls, but only the whiniest Seahawks sour grape koolaid drinker can claim that the refs stole that game from the seahawks.
I agree. Tatum never touched that ball! We was robbed.
I'm a Navy dad too
Give Seattle 7 for the first TD, give them 7 more for the holding call on the 2 yard line reception. Seattle 24, Steelers 21.
STEELERS! Good name for them!
I luuuuv instant replay!
I didn't real have a dog in the fight, but the game was poorly called. In general, the Seahawks got robbed.
The offensive pass interference against Seattle in the end zone? Come on.
Ben Rothlisbergers(sp) faux tochdown? I watched that a dozen times and NEVER saw the ball even touch the plane of the goal line until after his knee was ling down.
Hasselbeck's low block call? Oh, brother. Another bad call.
And, what's up with the line judge who nose-dived into the pile of players?
No money on the outcome, but it was a poorly called game. The author is correct about the need for revision.
Finally an honest Steeler fan.
They'll need a rule change to legalize pushing off by the receiver for that call to be overturned.
I really could have cared about either team and really don't care who won. I just wanted to see a good game. Having said that, in my opinion, it was the worse officiated Super Bowl I have ever seen. It is the damn Super Bowl, let them play. That offensive pass interference call on Seattle in the first was soft, to say the least. Hell, how often do you see offensive pass interference called in the regular season when both players are shoving each other all out? Usually, those calls go against the defense. To call it on that soft a play, in the Super Bowl? Nonsense. Moroever, to call holding on a play that would have given Seattle the ball on the two when even Madden is saying, "I'm sorry, that is NOT holding in the NFL." Methinks something was a bit amiss in the officiating. You can call holding on almost any play and for some reason, the officials were calling it on the most critical. Seemed weired to me.
FIXED!!! Sorry game, and all sports shows this morning are saying the same things!
An extended version of the pre-game show with Stevie Wonder might have been a better half-time show. Not too sure what to make of your other comment about "whitening things up". Or maybe I'm just more likely to give you the benefit of the doubt. But, Michael McDonald? Old Sock-in-the-Mouth Mike? The man that ruined the Doobie Brothers?! That Michael McDonald?!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.