Posted on 02/07/2006 10:26:38 AM PST by summer
I am already 20 threads past this. What did I write that deserved such a eloquent response?
The New York Times finds its journalistic responsibility sufficiently sated by printing leaked national security information that could help terrorists to kill more Americans, even when requested not to do so by the government.
The "Old Gray Lady" resembles a very prim and proper SNL "church lady" hiding a porn magazine in her knitting and piously sputtering "Isn't that SPECIAL?!"
bump
Franky, I don't see, why are all the Muslims/Arabs so upset?
...during the recent battles in Jerusalem, Didn't the terrorists/PaliArabs use use a (Christian/Greek) Church, as a toilet? Why wasn't there any "outraged" speechs then?
Those who are not dimwits understand "guilt by association" and are aware that there is NO ONE more anti-Islam on this site than I. And, unlike most, who spout off about this "religion" I have actually read the Koran.
What YOU remember is neither here nor there but what is real is that these people have every right to picket for whatever reason they wish.
You really believe that people have no right to protest when their sensibilities or principles or outraged? Or only people you like?
You spoke of alternative fuels as though they were a reality rather than a pipedream. We are decades away from any real alternative fuels. If not longer.
Sort of like fixing Social Security.
Thanks for posting that cartoon! :)
Nope entirely different matter.
Say, that wouldn't be a BLU-42? Otherwise affectionatley known as the "cheeseburger". Fits inside a C-130 mucho loud! LOL
I think it is an 82, but am not sure.
PING Check out
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.