Skip to comments.
Low-Fat Debunked, Scientists Back Low-Vitamin Diet
Scrappleface ^
| 2006-02-08
| Scott Ott
Posted on 02/08/2006 10:20:06 AM PST by Tarkin
(2006-02-08) In the wake of a $415 million study of 49,000 women showing that a low-fat diet will not prevent, or even reduce the risk, of heart disease and cancer, nutrition experts today said they now believe that the pathway to health is found in eating foods low in vitamins and high in monosodium glutamate (MSG).
(...) Science works by first making definitive recommendations, and then doing several years of research to discover if we were right, said an unnamed NIH spokesman. During the research phase, our job is to vigorously promote our assumptions until the facts disprove them.
(...) We feel even stronger about the Paramus Beach Diet than we did about the health effects of reducing dietary fat, he said. Americans should trust us, because our faith in our assumptions is rock solid.
(Excerpt) Read more at scrappleface.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: fat; health; low; nutrition; science; scientists; scrappleface
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Warning - Scrappleface
1
posted on
02/08/2006 10:20:09 AM PST
by
Tarkin
To: Tarkin
My grandmother is a health aficionado bur doesn't know "Scrappleface" or Mr. Ott
I suppose I could send her this article and see if she'll fall for it.
2
posted on
02/08/2006 10:21:48 AM PST
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: Tarkin
nutrition experts today said they now believe that the pathway to health is found in eating foods low in vitamins and high in monosodium glutamate (MSG). LOL!
To: Tarkin
"You mean I've been eating crap for nothing????"
4
posted on
02/08/2006 10:24:33 AM PST
by
Andy from Beaverton
(I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
To: Tarkin
I stick to the basic four food groups-alcohol, caffeine, salt and grease.
5
posted on
02/08/2006 10:26:10 AM PST
by
Spok
(Est omnis de civilitate.)
To: Tarkin
...study of 49,000 women showing that a low-fat diet will not prevent, or even reduce the risk, of heart disease and cancer
I can guess who some of those women were.
I can also wager that more than a few made their way into the US Senate & House of Representatives.
6
posted on
02/08/2006 10:27:04 AM PST
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: Tarkin
Science works by first making definitive recommendations, and then doing several years of research to discover if we were right, said an unnamed NIH spokesman. During the research phase, our job is to vigorously promote our assumptions until the facts disprove them. I didn't know that this thread was about (anthropogenic) global warming!
7
posted on
02/08/2006 10:40:53 AM PST
by
Jibaholic
(We wouldn't let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? -- Josef Stalin)
To: Jibaholic
I didn't know that this thread was about (anthropogenic) global warming! If it had been, then the statement would be: During the research phase, our job is to vigorously promote our assumptions until long after the facts disprove them.
8
posted on
02/08/2006 10:54:38 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(During wartime, some whistles should not be blown. - Orson Scott Card)
To: Andy from Beaverton
Rosie O'Donut doesn't eat crap.
She eats carpet.
9
posted on
02/08/2006 10:56:35 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Tarkin
LOL. Almost got me. Gotta look out for that Scrappleface.
10
posted on
02/08/2006 10:57:41 AM PST
by
radiohead
(Hey Kerry, I'm still here; still hating your lying, stinking guts, you coward.)
To: Andy from Beaverton
Well you are what you eat.
11
posted on
02/08/2006 10:59:42 AM PST
by
ghitma
(Lifter)
To: Tarkin
Science works by first making definitive recommendations, and then doing several years of research to discover if we were right, said an unnamed NIH spokesman. What an abomination: this person does not even know what science is! Science does not make recommendations: social engineers who pretend to be scientists do that. Science formulates hypotheses and withholds judgment until these hypotheses are either refuted (the best outcome) or sufficiently corroborated, in which case they are cautiously accepted for the time being.
This "scientist" is a good example and an explanation why physicists and engineers can send a spacecraft millions o miles away and nutritionists keep changing their minds about everything every two weeks. It's not the complexity of their tasks but the lack of scientific honesty and other values that renders them impotent. And, in the case of the quoted "scientist," also stupid.
12
posted on
02/08/2006 11:08:49 AM PST
by
TopQuark
To: TopQuark
Pssst: Hey(in whisper)buddy, this is scrappleface.
13
posted on
02/08/2006 11:15:44 AM PST
by
calex59
(seeing the light shouldn't make you go blind)
To: calex59
"Um, Miss Emily, this is scrappleface."
What's that ? Scrappleface?
Oh, never mind..........
14
posted on
02/08/2006 11:18:52 AM PST
by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: calex59
this is scrappleface. And "scrappleface" is something like Shakespeare or Dostoevsky which we must have heard about without comments?
I've not heard of it and unlikely will after this post.
15
posted on
02/08/2006 11:25:03 AM PST
by
TopQuark
To: Spok
You may as well because sooner or later that diet will be touted as the best, too.
To: Tarkin
This is soooo true. People tell me God does not exist because of our beloved scientists and all they 'know'. My father especially, his religion is science. I say there requires just as much faith in science as their is in religion.
17
posted on
02/08/2006 11:30:37 AM PST
by
sandbar
To: Tarkin
Science works by first making definitive recommendations, and then doing several years of research to discover if we were right, said an unnamed NIH spokesman. During the research phase, our job is to vigorously promote our assumptions until the facts disprove them. I know this is satire, but this is a pretty close description of how the "Scientists in the Public Interest" group actually operates.
18
posted on
02/08/2006 11:38:11 AM PST
by
LexBaird
("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
To: Tarkin
How about a No-Food diet?
19
posted on
02/08/2006 11:38:38 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
To: TopQuark
I've not heard of it and unlikely will after this post. Scrappleface is a satire site, often linked to on FR. It's humor, okay?
20
posted on
02/08/2006 11:40:54 AM PST
by
LexBaird
("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson