Skip to comments.
White House Gives Details on Surveillance
AP on Yahoo ^
| 2/8/06
| Katherine Shrader - ap
Posted on 02/08/2006 4:12:10 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
2
posted on
02/08/2006 4:13:07 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
Rep. Heather Wilson, R-N.M., chairwoman of the House Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence, speaks to the media during a press conference on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2006, in Washington. Breaking with the White House, Wilson who chairs the panel that oversees the National Security Agency wants Congress to change a 1978 foreign intelligence law following the disclosure of President George W. Bush's eavesdropping program. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
3
posted on
02/08/2006 4:13:49 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
Representative Heather WILSON (R)
New Mexico, District 1
2004 Score - 84
Previous Year's Score - 76
Lifetime Score - 83
Years of Service - 7
Hmm. Not exactly a RINO.
4
posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:10 PM PST
by
billybudd
To: NormsRevenge
My bet is that what was given to the house committee has been tagged so that whoever leaks the information will be known.
5
posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:14 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
("We don't need POLITICIANS...we need STATESMEN.")
To: NormsRevenge
Let's play a game children. Who will be he first moonbat democrat to leak this stuff to the media?
6
posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:19 PM PST
by
newnhdad
(All your government branches are belong to us!!)
To: NormsRevenge; Mo1; kcvl; Dog
"It's a different program than I was beginning to let myself believe," said Alabama Rep. Bud Cramer, the senior Democrat on the Intelligence Committee's oversight subcommittee. "This may be a valuable program," Cramer said, adding that he didn't know if it was legal. "My direction of thinking was changed tremendously."
We've been TRYING to tell you.
Expect everything they heard to LEAK shortly.
7
posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:30 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: NormsRevenge
On 9/11/2001 I wrote my congressman demanding a declaration of war from Congress.
Later, Congress provided an "Authorization for the Use of Force" which is a chickenshit way of avoiding giving power to the Executive Branch.
So now, we have treason occurring and no way to enforce it because we are not at war, we are at "Use of Force". These people (I mean our freakin congresspeople) are helping the enemy and nobody is doing diddly squat about it.
Man does that piss me off!
How pathetic does it get?!??
8
posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:39 PM PST
by
Paloma_55
(Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
To: newnhdad
Shall we start the pool now?
9
posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:46 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: NormsRevenge
To: EQAndyBuzz
11
posted on
02/08/2006 4:17:06 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: NormsRevenge
"This may be a valuable program," Cramer said, adding that he didn't know if it was legal. "My direction of thinking was changed tremendously." Still, Cramer said, some members remain angry and frustrated, and he didn't know why the White House waited so long to inform Congress of its actions.
Ah, the Mediacrats see the writing on the wall. An orchestrated briefing allows a prominent Democrat to endorse what was legal and necessary while mini-slamming the national defense at the same time.
Brilliant.
Democrats lose again. Another one for Bush and Rove.
To: NormsRevenge
"House and Senate and its intelligence committees" ... an oxymoron of an oxymoron. if I ever heard one.
13
posted on
02/08/2006 4:17:46 PM PST
by
xcamel
(One should hope Global Dumbing is reversible.)
To: NormsRevenge
Details of the program soon to be released in the NY Times.
14
posted on
02/08/2006 4:18:37 PM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: NormsRevenge
That Wilson woman just weakened US security. Her electorate should be admonished to return her to the civilian employment sector as soon as possible.
I'm sending her opponent a donation.
15
posted on
02/08/2006 4:19:16 PM PST
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: billybudd
Representative Heather WILSON (R) New Mexico, District 1 2004 Score - 84 Previous Year's Score - 76 Lifetime Score - 83 Years of Service - 7 Hmm. Not exactly a RINO. Heather represents a highly dem district and is facing a tough election this fall. Positioning herself.
To: NormsRevenge
Do we have a list of those who recieved this info?
I am certain we'll need the list.
Loose lips sink ships.
17
posted on
02/08/2006 4:19:21 PM PST
by
onyx
To: NormsRevenge
Re:
...provided a House committee with highly classified information about the program. Lets see, what is the over and under on the Dems on the committee leaking to the NYSlimes?
The under is online now and the over is tomorrow morning's edition...
18
posted on
02/08/2006 4:19:49 PM PST
by
Bender2
(Stop doodling around... Read the first three chapters of my Science Fiction novel.)
To: NormsRevenge
A Republican who wants terrorists to win. FISA is a long range law that after the prep time looks at designated things. NSA was acting on spur of the moment incidents which could be very short-term and immediate threats.
With proper preparation and lead time FISA is used to setup a surveillance to gather evidence. NSA is looking to stop an immediate death.
Good thing she does not represent me cause she lost my vote on one issue. "Public Safety" - she's against it! As well as Specter and the lot of the 'Broken and spinless back Congress"
19
posted on
02/08/2006 4:19:53 PM PST
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: EQAndyBuzz
My bet is that what was given to the house committee has been tagged so that whoever leaks the information will be known.Please God they had enough brains to do that. I'm sure the NYT is frantically rushing all of the details to print even as I post.
20
posted on
02/08/2006 4:19:59 PM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson