Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Foreign Policy Takes 'Neo-Realist' Approach
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-9-2006 | Aled Russell

Posted on 02/08/2006 6:51:11 PM PST by blam

US foreign policy takes 'neo-realist' approach

By Alec Russell in Washington
(Filed: 09/02/2006)

A shift in the Bush administration's approach to the world from "with us or against us" to diplomacy has led to the coinage of a new phrase - "neo-realism" - to describe the philosophy of the key figures behind the president's foreign policy.

Neo-realism is intended as a play on neo-conservatism, the belief in a muscular foreign policy that dominated the administration's thinking after the September 11 attacks.

Dick Cheney: 'We are obviously pursuing a diplomatic road'

The neo-realists are seen as pragmatists who seek aggressively to defend America's interests but to do it with a softer face.

To see how the tone has shifted in the last year there was no better insight than an interview on Tuesday night with vice-president Dick Cheney, once the administration's most outspoken hawk, on a flagship news show.

The backdrop was familiar: a hostile Middle Eastern nation appears to be striving to gain nuclear weapons; diplomats are talking of a showdown at the UN.

Less than four years ago such a scenario was the cue for Mr Cheney to put the case for action against Iraq.

On paper, the stage was set for a similar broadside against Iran. Instead, despite constant prodding, Mr Cheney would only say of the threat: "We think it's dangerous."

He added: "We are obviously pursuing a diplomatic road to resolve this matter. We think that's the way to go."

No one in Washington believes Mr Cheney has become a believer in the efficacy of multilateral diplomacy. Rather his comments reflect the shift in America's approach to the world - and in power in Washington - since Condoleezza Rice became secretary of state last January.

Keith Richburg, the foreign editor of the Washington Post, said the key change was in style rather than substance: "On front burner issues Condi has shown a willingness to roll up her sleeves and get involved.

"I guess in diplomacy the appearance is as important as the substance.

"It's better to have allies on board than to have them p****d off. It doesn't mean you have to change your policy."

The original neo-conservatives were liberals who backed a robust foreign policy against the Soviet Union.

More recently they have become known as pro-Israel hawks.

In the past few years, as their trademark policy, the war in Iraq, has become increasingly discredited, the word "neo-con" has become a catchall term of abuse of Mr Bush's first-term foreign policy aides.

As the unofficial high priestess of neo-realism, Ms Rice is backed by her deputy, Robert Zoellick and Nicholas Burns, the undersecretary of state for political affairs.

While sceptical of the chances of diplomacy brokering a solution to the Iranian crisis, neo-conservatives caution against talk of a sea-change.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: approach; foreign; foreignpolicy; neorealist; policy; takes; us

1 posted on 02/08/2006 6:51:13 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Nonsense. Utter wishful thinking by the gutless European surrender monkeys. Bush is merely giving the EU whiners enought rope to hang themsleves with over Iran. Pretty soon they are going to be all out of excuses.


2 posted on 02/08/2006 6:53:32 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Exactly


3 posted on 02/08/2006 6:54:30 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Every single troll is now an enemy of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Sure hope that is the case!


4 posted on 02/08/2006 6:57:22 PM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Fox and Lion. I like it.


5 posted on 02/08/2006 6:57:34 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

Oh yeah. Obvious. After listening to all the euro trash whine endlessly about Iraq, Bush is playing this smarter. He is not trusting what they say but is letting them paint themselves into a corner. Rope a dope just like with the Dim here.


6 posted on 02/08/2006 7:00:34 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
I always believed President Bush and cabinet, backed off the Iran threat by letting the "Big 3" negotiate the terms, primarily for the reasons you state.

Perhaps now that Europe is having their own problems they won't be snotty.

7 posted on 02/08/2006 7:13:10 PM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

It sounds like a Neo-fascist Neo-Stalinist journalist wrote this article.


8 posted on 02/08/2006 7:20:07 PM PST by Wiz (News hyaena providing you news with spice of acid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
"Perhaps now that Europe is having their own problems they won't be snotty."

Yup. Iran's missiles with nukes can reach them, not us. Your call Europe.

9 posted on 02/08/2006 8:24:35 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson