Skip to comments.Secret Court's Judges Were Warned About NSA Spy Data (Shhhhh...it's a secret)
Posted on 02/08/2006 8:14:28 PM PST by frankjr
Twice in the past four years, a top Justice Department lawyer warned the presiding judge of a secret surveillance court that information overheard in President Bush's eavesdropping program may have been improperly used to obtain wiretap warrants in the court, according to two sources with knowledge of those events.
The revelations infuriated U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly -- who, like her predecessor, Royce C. Lamberth, had expressed serious doubts about whether the warrantless monitoring of phone calls and e-mails ordered by Bush was legal. Both judges had insisted that no information obtained this way be used to gain warrants from their court, according to government sources, and both had been assured by administration officials it would never happen.
The two heads of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court were the only judges in the country briefed by the administration on Bush's program. The president's secret order, issued sometime after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, allows the National Security Agency to monitor telephone calls and e-mails between people in the United States and contacts overseas.
Yet another problem in a 2005 warrant application prompted Kollar-Kotelly to issue a stern order to government lawyers to create a better firewall or face more difficulty obtaining warrants.
The two judges' discomfort with the NSA spying program was previously known. But this new account reveals the depth of their doubts about its legality and their behind-the-scenes efforts to protect the court from what they considered potentially tainted evidence. The new accounts also show the degree to which Baker, a top intelligence expert at Justice, shared their reservations and aided the judges.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Do people understand that there is a war going on???
forest for the trees
That's alright, these stories are doing nothing but making the Dems look weak on National Security (nothing new). And the public support for the NSA program has been growing since the news first broke.
Sorry, but Royce Lambert has been a reliable strict constructionist, and was one of the judges who recommended the appointment of Ken Starr. Kotar-Kelly (or whatever her hyphenation is) is a Clintoon appointee.
any babe who is a judge and needs to keep her maiden name has "some Issues"... either that or she has no kids and is even more stupid than Margaret Marshall (D/ S. Africa/
MA Supreme Court.
Coming from a former Babe who uses her husband's name!
I would say that most Americans would want the President to be able to get information on terrorist activity. They dont object to eavesdropping on terrorist phone calls, but the press and the Democrat hate mongers are determined to keep hammering on this till something gives.
I guess they havent seen that it isnt causing a big stir among voters , just among the regular suspects ---Bush bashers.
So a possible scenario is this:
The NSA finds out that Mohammad al-Jihad in Warziristain is calling Muzar el Fatwah in the US. Turns this over to the FBI who goes to the FISA court for a warrant to do a full blown wiretap.
Isn't that how the systems is supposed to work? How the heck are we supposed to find out WHO to get a warrant for with out doing the preliminary work?
The MSM is spinning this so that it would appear to be illegal to even put together a list of suspects.
You do mean the war being waged by Democrats against President Bush, don't you?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly (born 1943 in New York) is a judge for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).
Kollar-Kotelly obtained her J.D. from the Catholic University of America's Columbus School of Law in 1968. From 1969 to 1972, Kollar-Kotelly was an attorney for the Department of Justice, after which she became chief legal counsel for St. Elizabeths Hospital.
In 1984, Kollar-Kotelly was appointed as an associate judge of the D.C. Superior Court. She served as deputy presiding judge from 1995 until her appointment to the federal bench by President Bill Clinton was confirmed in March of 1997. In May 2002, Chief Justice William Rehnquist appointed Judge Kollar-Kotelly to serve as the presiding judge of the FISC.
In August 2001, Kollar-Kotelly received national attention when she was chosen to preside over the appeal in United States v. Microsoft, an anti-trust case. The decision was reversed in part and upheld in part.
Exactly - I read this and say "bureaucratic bozos are trying to create extra barriers for intel agencies desperately trying to track down the perps of the next 9/11 before it happens." Oh, my, the FISA warrant process has to be so puuuuuuurrrrrre, and if we have vital counter-terrorist info derived from secret NSA monitoring of TERRORISTS we cannot use it to obtain a legal warrant for other kinds of monitoring.
In other words, these DNC-hacks would rather see thousands of Americans slaughtered in the next 9/11 than allow a FISA warrant to be based in any way upon vital information obtained by the NSA.
The implication for these bozos is: (1) we may know that X is part of an active Al Qaeda cell in the USA preparing to kill thousands, BUT (2) our hands are tied because the info was obtained from the NSA monitoring terrorist phone numbers obtained in some raid in Afghanistan, etc. (3) we'll just wait until X and his cell kill thousands, and then wail about how the Bush administration failed to "connect the dots"......
This is foolish, obtuse, PRE-9/11 thinking.
Wait a minute Your Honor. Do I have this right? We were monitoring the enemy's wireless communications and found out they were talking a lot to somebody in the United States. So, we came to you for a warrant. Now, you say we can't have the warrant because the information that forms the basis for the request for a warrant was obtained without a warrant?
The Libs and most DemonRATs do NOT believe there is a WOT. So yes, just go ahead and pass a Terrorist Bill of Rights - we can save a hell of a lot of hearing time on the Hill. Let Congress get back to work - ha ha
OH FOR CRYIN OUT LOUD ANOTHER LEAK!
||Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly Judge Kollar-Kotelly was appointed to the United States District Court in May 1997. She received a B.A. in 1965 from The Catholic University of America and a J.D. in 1968 from Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America. Following law school, she served as law clerk to Judge Catherine B. Kelly of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. From 1969 to 1972, Judge Kollar-Kotelly was an attorney in the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and then served as the chief legal counsel to Saint Elizabeths Hospital until 1984. She was appointed Associate Judge of the D.C. Superior Court in October 1984, and served as Deputy Presiding Judge of the Criminal Division from 1995 until her appointment to the federal bench. Judge Kollar-Kotelly has been a Fellow of the American Bar Association, a founding member of the Thurgood Marshall Inn of Court, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University School of Medicine in a joint teaching program on mental health and the law, and chair of the Board of the Art Trust for Superior Court. Judge Kotelly was appointed by Chief Justice Rehnquist to serve as a member of the Judicial Conference Committee on Financial Disclosure from June 2000 through May 2002, and in May 2002 Chief Justice Rehnquist appointed Judge Kotelly to serve as Presiding Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court , which is a 7-year appointment.|
You do NOT have a Constitutionally protect right to commit treason. The minute they started playing footsie with Al Qeda they were NO longer protected as members of our Civil Society but were OUR ENEMIES as any even marginally sane Adult Judge should of instinctively KNOWN.
Have a look at this!
Sorry, I hit private message in error.
Ignore the mail...lol.
And looks who's complaining, James A. Baker.
this is exactly why the 9-11 commission, apparently one of the few issues they got right, identified the FISA court as a major problem. this court wants to make the constitution a suicide pact, wants to make it impossible to do any pro-active law enforcement regading terrorism. all courts are essentially "after the crime" institutions - designed to deal with issues that occur AFTER a crime is commited. with terrorism, the people want it stopped before it happens, and the judicial system is not structured to support that.
They had the program shut down????
You just nailed it. This would be funny if it were not so utterly stupid and dangerous. I am beginning to think every FISA court act should be proceeded by the judges being required to watch 45 minutes of video of Americans jump burning to their death from the Twin Towers or listening to a tape of the cell phone calls from the planes. Maybe THAT would wake them up to the fact this is NOT some Law School role playing game in Judaical purity being played out here.
I'm trying to discern which way Royce Lamberth was leaning. I always liked him.
at least this article is telling us something we had wondered - the chief judge is actually acknowledging that this court was making it harder to obtain warrants.
"...prompted Kollar-Kotelly to issue a stern order to government lawyers to create a better firewall or face more difficulty obtaining warrants"
But now, a few judges are whining because we are wiretapping terrorists? Hey, here's an idea. The WH just doesn't bother to go to the FISA court for any reason in the future. That would solve everybodies problem. The judges don't want 'tainted' evidence in FISA application and the WH doesn't want to have to submit to FISA for every freaking thing it does. Sounds like an easy solution is just to skip FISA unless we are working on a criminal case and the evidence needs to be admissible.
You're a spiker, aren't you? Does anybody post comments like that for real? Best laugh I had all day!
why Rehnquist selected her, I have no idea. he slipped up, bigtime.
I don't know what to say anymore. They're gonna get us killed. I want to call the Justice tomorrow and scream STOP THE LEAKS!
If FISA doesn't allow for constitutional authorities, like article 2, then FISA becomes unconstitutional because they can't trump the constitution without a congressionally passed amendment. It appears that Gonzales was right about FISA being limited in authorities.
Goofball! I checked my mail first and thought WTF? LOL!!
Our enemy within. Damn them.
They only engage in this activity, because there are no consequences for doing so. Executing a few guilty US Senators would reduce the number of leaks most significantly.
That sums it up
Let thousands be killed ... because terrorists have civil rights and the courts are going to protect them
Hold your horsies! I corrected my error!
What an activist --tch:
I can't believe how reckless the left has become.
I said on another thread that it would be less then 24 hours before the leaks started coming
from what I have read, this NSA Terrorists surveillance program was not about law enforcement, it is about monitoring the enemy within
Gamesmanship and the game is too damn dangerous.
There was nothing about the program itself being "shut down"
maybe the nerve gas scare will shake some of these idiots up. although it was a false alarm, it could easily have been real (like the anthrax attacks). maybe they will think to themselves - "the enemy is out there, and they could pull off an attack like this, maybe we better get serious about thwarting it".
They'll only get worse. Guaranteed.
And, I am tired of hearing that it's only the "far left" because it's the whole of the GD democrat party.
yup, its them.
Risking the safety of the nation all for the expressed purpose of regaining power. That's what all this is about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.