Skip to comments.
Conservatives Unsettled About Movement's Future
New York Times ^
| 2/10/06
| ADAM NAGOURNEY and DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Posted on 02/09/2006 10:24:33 PM PST by conservative in nyc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
The New York Times' doom and gloom take on CPAC, for what it's worth. Is the last paragraph about Vice President Cheney's reception remotely true?
To: conservative in nyc
Just more wishful thinking from the lockstep liberal dinosaurs at the Times.
2
posted on
02/09/2006 10:27:06 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(Do not needlessly endanger your lives until I give you the signal. - Ike)
To: conservative in nyc
lol there was a thread earlier saying he recieved great appaulse I try to find it
3
posted on
02/09/2006 10:30:49 PM PST
by
bayourant
To: conservative in nyc
[Senator Lindsey] Graham said many conservatives like himself There's your problem right there. The NY Times believes Lindsey Graham is a conservative. He and his RINO buddy McCain are about as conservative as Howard Dean.
4
posted on
02/09/2006 10:31:17 PM PST
by
Waryone
To: conservative in nyc
The Slimes wouldn't see reality, if it were biting its collective noses. This is just "stuff"/propaganda, to cheer up Liberals and make Conservatives angry/worried.
5
posted on
02/09/2006 10:33:34 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: Waryone
6
posted on
02/09/2006 10:34:09 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: Waryone
You couldn't be more righter!!!
7
posted on
02/09/2006 10:34:36 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(GovernMental EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
To: JennysCool
Here I was expecting them to talk about illegal immigration.
The spying thing is the last thing on my mind. I applaud it, and if a court is getting the way of a program that's stopping terrorism, bypass it. No sense in wasting time with a broken process.
At least they mentioned the spending issue. That does need to change.
To: conservative in nyc
The NYT has become the National Lampoon and they don't even know it. Classic. Did they even publish the big Reid story from earlier today (PST)?
9
posted on
02/09/2006 10:35:14 PM PST
by
Carling
(Your Super Bowl XL Champion Pittsburgh SteAlers!)
To: conservative in nyc
I don't buy the Cheney bit. However, the other two points are quite valid. There is a really significant conservative rebellion on immigration and spending, in particular in the House. The speaker of the house has openly served warning on the spending issue, and it would be foolish to underestimate his power.
To: conservative in nyc
But they made it clear that that was not enough.Neither party wants to close the borders or veto any spending. Net loss for conservatives.
11
posted on
02/09/2006 10:35:41 PM PST
by
quantim
(If the Constitution were perfect it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
To: CheyennePress
The article does discuss conservatives' disappointment with the administration's immigration proposals. I had to omit it due to copyright constraints. Click on the link for more, if you have the stomach for it.
To: bayourant
13
posted on
02/09/2006 10:37:29 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(GovernMental EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
To: conservative in nyc
Lindsay Graham is a conservative?
lol
14
posted on
02/09/2006 10:37:49 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
He a wing-nut in the view of the NYT. LOL.
15
posted on
02/09/2006 10:38:44 PM PST
by
onyx
To: Carling
The NYT has become the National Lampoon and they don't even know it. Classic. Did they even publish the big Reid story from earlier today (PST)?
I'll look for it. I know there is a Washington Post article about it that I might post if it hasn't been posted already.
To: onyx
he's got more moves than schwarzeRenegger's stunt double. lol
17
posted on
02/09/2006 10:40:03 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: conservative in nyc
Geeeeze Elmer, do yall thank them goobers over at the New York Slimes wuld lie to us ol conservatives?
18
posted on
02/09/2006 10:41:30 PM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: bayourant
Adding his voice to the presidents own on the subject, Cheney said that the presidents authorization of some limited domestic surveillance fit snugly in the category of ensuring the safety of the U.S.
"We will not simply sit back until we are hit again, he said to standing applause.
"He knows what his job is, Cheney said about the chief executive.
"We are still at risk of attack of attack, the vice president emphasized despite those who would "downplay the chances.
"As long as George Bush is president, we shall not let down our guard, Cheney concluded to a standing ovation in the Regency Ballroom.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/2/9/224612.shtml?s=ic
19
posted on
02/09/2006 10:42:01 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
To: conservative in nyc
wow, what a shocker. The times and the rest of the liberal media running stories about how the republican party is falling part during an election year. They never do that.
20
posted on
02/09/2006 10:42:55 PM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson