Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie
Meanwhile Google, acting as as accessory after the fact, claims "privacy rights" to justify refusing to let the Federal Govt see the search records of Google users who go to child porn sites.

It wasn't even that specific. All they wanted were frequency statistics to be able to make a case in future warrants of the prevalence of this activity.

18 posted on 02/11/2006 12:19:17 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ElkGroveDan

And I thought I was nauseated before by Googel


20 posted on 02/11/2006 12:21:48 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Conservatives...lack sufficient cynicism to properly assess the nature of their liberal opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

It was my understanding that it had nothing to do with child pornography sites. They wanted statistics on whether or not children could get to regular porn sites.


21 posted on 02/11/2006 12:22:40 PM PST by Bubbatuck ("Hillary Clinton can kiss my ass" - Tim Robbins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan
Google is like Gates. Trust your gut instinct.
Mine says "Creepy and way beyond creepy".
22 posted on 02/11/2006 12:25:08 PM PST by ishabibble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson