Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar
suntimes ^ | February 11, 2006

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:11:34 PM PST by Revel

Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar

BY JUSTINA WANG A 12-year-old Aurora boy who said he brought powdered sugar to school for a science project this week has been charged with a felony for possessing a look-alike drug, Aurora police have confirmed.

The sixth-grade student at Waldo Middle School was also suspended for two weeks from school after showing the bag of powdered sugar to his friends.

The boy, who is not being identified because he is a juvenile, said he brought the bag to school to ask his science teacher if he could run an experiment using sugar.

Two other boys asked if the bag contained cocaine after he showed it to them in the bathroom Wednesday morning, the boy's mother said.

He joked that it was cocaine, before telling them, "just kidding," she said.

Aurora police arrested the boy after a custodian at the school reported the boy's comments. The youngster was taken to the police station and detained, before being released to his parents that afternoon.

"This is getting ridiculous," said the boy's mother. "They treated my son like a criminal. .. . This is no way to treat a 12-year-old kid."

East Aurora School District officials declined to comment on the case, citing privacy issues.

The district issued a written statement, which said: "The dangers of illegal drugs and controlled substances are clear.

Could get probation "Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."

The school handbook states that students can be suspended or expelled for carrying a look-alike drug.

Penalties for juveniles are decided on a case-by-case basis, but if convicted, the sixth-grader could likely face up to five years' probation, said Jeffery Jefko, deputy director of Kane County juvenile court services.

Juveniles who have prior criminal records could also be placed in a residential treatment program if convicted, he said.

Aurora Beacon-News


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alibi; anarchy; barneyfife; billofrights; chiefwiggum; constitutionlist; drugsarebadmkay; education; fructose; glucose; govwatch; healthypeople2010; hifructosecornsyrup; keystonecops; libertarians; maltose; nipitinthebud; officerbarbrady; pspl; respectmyauthority; schools; student; students; stupidsneversleep; sugarhigh; suger; sweet; sweettooth; wod; wodlist; zerotolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 661-663 next last
To: FreePaul

ROTFLMAOPMP ~ no doubt!


121 posted on 02/11/2006 7:19:09 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: null and void

VOUCHERS

Null and void,

Tax credits would be better.


122 posted on 02/11/2006 7:20:30 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
I need another giggle.

That should be enough for a "medical marijuana" recommendation.

123 posted on 02/11/2006 7:20:34 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Yeah, saw that coming a mile away.

In my opinion vouchers are nothing more than another way to latch onto the government tit.

Look up the stats on charter schools in DC. They are scary. More than 1/2 of all charter schools in DC perform below DC public schools. After 5 years, the charters of low performing schools are revoked, but the charters reform under new names and new management and oh my the money comes rolling in.

Here's my favorite scenario. Let's give vouchers to parents to use for supplies for home-schooling. There have been enough stories of welfare mothers having extra kids for the extra cash. How long would the lines of welfare mothers be holding out their hands for $$ claiming that they are homeschooling? It would probably outnumber the crack addicts, but not by much.

Yes, I am cynical. Been around too damn long to not be. Not everyone is like "us" normal people. Some parents are evil and looking for mo' money, mo' money, mo' money at every corner.

124 posted on 02/11/2006 7:20:37 PM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

But your kids were not required to attend government schools. Therefore, attendance at government schools was not compulsory.


125 posted on 02/11/2006 7:21:41 PM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
I don't smoke pot. I don't snort sugar, either.

So, how long should we keep the kid in jail?
126 posted on 02/11/2006 7:23:12 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting; wintertime

*sigh* Yeah.

OTOH, I've searched the Constitution in vain for any reference to education being a Federal responsibility.

Maybe I missed it?


127 posted on 02/11/2006 7:23:31 PM PST by null and void (<---- Aged to perfection, and beyond...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

In my county, the penalty for look-alike drugs is identical to having the real thing. So, whatever the penalty is for cocaine would probably be appropriate.


128 posted on 02/11/2006 7:24:22 PM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Now that's the kinda lunatic rhetoric I'm talking about.

Mojave,

The biggest political bully get to control the political, cultural, and the moral, ethical, and values ( that means religious belief) agenda.

What is a simple word for the above: INDOCTRINATION!

It is impossible for education of the young to be moral, ethics neutral or politically, and culturally values free. That is why government should get out of this business immediately! We have a human right to freedom of conscience and government schools violate freedom of conscience every minute of every day!


129 posted on 02/11/2006 7:24:34 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: steveo
I once torqued off our high school vice principal (1970) for having a box candy cigarettes in my right sock (just enough so he could see it).

I know drivers who like to have fake cardboard "radar detectors" clipped prominently to their sun visors while driving through states where radar detectors are illegal...

130 posted on 02/11/2006 7:25:42 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting

I had better call a tip in on Kroger. Those jerks are pushing fake cocaine nationwide in broad daylight. I saw this woman buying a kilo of it yesterday.


131 posted on 02/11/2006 7:26:17 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Good catch. I happen to disagree that Education should be under the auspices of the Federal Government. In addition, I believe that the power of the Feds should be limited to what is specifically laid out in the Constitution and that would be interstate commerce, defense and foreign affairs.
132 posted on 02/11/2006 7:26:51 PM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Revel
When sugar is outlawed, only outlaws with a sweet tooth will obtain sugar.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

133 posted on 02/11/2006 7:27:12 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Do they advertise it as cocaine?


134 posted on 02/11/2006 7:27:40 PM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting
But your kids were not required to attend government schools. Therefore, attendance at government schools was not compulsory.

Thoeting.

Government indoctrination camp is COMPULSORY on the pain of arrest, and prison for the parents and foster care for the children, if the parents do not have the option of homeschool or private school. If the parent resists the government authorities to a sufficient level they risk being shot and killed.

For homeschoolers who resist the government they too risk arrest and prison, and the placement of their children in foster care. If homeschool parents are sufficiently resistant they risk being shot and killed by the police.

This is what government schools are!
135 posted on 02/11/2006 7:29:06 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
If homeschool parents are sufficiently resistant they risk being shot and killed by the police.


Shot and KILLED? Isn't that taking this a bit far?

136 posted on 02/11/2006 7:31:06 PM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
I don't snort sugar

Well, pin a rose on you.

137 posted on 02/11/2006 7:31:20 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting
Shot and KILLED? Isn't that taking this a bit far?

Thoeting,

If parents are sufficiently resistant to government school bureaucrats, police, court orders, and social workers,,,,,yes,,,,they risk being shot and killed. This is true of those who resist paying taxes as well.
138 posted on 02/11/2006 7:33:19 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting
Shot and KILLED? Isn't that taking this a bit far?

Thoeting,

Just as there are very, very few tax resisters who push it that far, parents are not stupid either. BUT,,,,this IS the power that government schools have over the lives of citizens.
139 posted on 02/11/2006 7:34:43 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting
Here's my favorite scenario. Let's give vouchers to parents to use for supplies for home-schooling. There have been enough stories of welfare mothers having extra kids for the extra cash. How long would the lines of welfare mothers be holding out their hands for $$ claiming that they are homeschooling? It would probably outnumber the crack addicts, but not by much. ( Thoeting)

Thoeting,

I agree with you completely.

Ideally, parents would pay for their own children's education. Are you aware that private schooling is really very inexpensive on average. In many cases the cost of K-12 education is less than the cost of babysitting.

Private vouchers to private schools should be available to the poor. How about a yearly "Education United Fund" drive for the poor?
140 posted on 02/11/2006 7:40:35 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 661-663 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson