Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar
suntimes ^ | February 11, 2006

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:11:34 PM PST by Revel

Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar

BY JUSTINA WANG A 12-year-old Aurora boy who said he brought powdered sugar to school for a science project this week has been charged with a felony for possessing a look-alike drug, Aurora police have confirmed.

The sixth-grade student at Waldo Middle School was also suspended for two weeks from school after showing the bag of powdered sugar to his friends.

The boy, who is not being identified because he is a juvenile, said he brought the bag to school to ask his science teacher if he could run an experiment using sugar.

Two other boys asked if the bag contained cocaine after he showed it to them in the bathroom Wednesday morning, the boy's mother said.

He joked that it was cocaine, before telling them, "just kidding," she said.

Aurora police arrested the boy after a custodian at the school reported the boy's comments. The youngster was taken to the police station and detained, before being released to his parents that afternoon.

"This is getting ridiculous," said the boy's mother. "They treated my son like a criminal. .. . This is no way to treat a 12-year-old kid."

East Aurora School District officials declined to comment on the case, citing privacy issues.

The district issued a written statement, which said: "The dangers of illegal drugs and controlled substances are clear.

Could get probation "Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."

The school handbook states that students can be suspended or expelled for carrying a look-alike drug.

Penalties for juveniles are decided on a case-by-case basis, but if convicted, the sixth-grader could likely face up to five years' probation, said Jeffery Jefko, deputy director of Kane County juvenile court services.

Juveniles who have prior criminal records could also be placed in a residential treatment program if convicted, he said.

Aurora Beacon-News


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alibi; anarchy; barneyfife; billofrights; chiefwiggum; constitutionlist; drugsarebadmkay; education; fructose; glucose; govwatch; healthypeople2010; hifructosecornsyrup; keystonecops; libertarians; maltose; nipitinthebud; officerbarbrady; pspl; respectmyauthority; schools; student; students; stupidsneversleep; sugarhigh; suger; sweet; sweettooth; wod; wodlist; zerotolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-663 next last
To: Fresh Wind
If I were the parents of the child, I'd file the same charges of 'possession of a look alike drug' against the school, all the teachers therein, and each and every member of the school board.

For there is sugar in all the cafeteria's and coffee mess's throughout the school district.

So mass arrests for all.

I'm sure that the school board would eagerly seek out a compromise if their necks were on the chopping block as well.
41 posted on 02/11/2006 5:11:56 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Now, having raided my Mother's spice cabinet, placed various spices in a cellophane bag, and then inside a crumpled brown paper bag, I decided to have some "fun" with the potheads at my school.

It was all fun and games, until somebody snitched. I had the potheads thinking it was real. But we got hauled into the vice principal's office.

I guess I should be lucky that happened thirty years ago, otherwise my Naval Career and Legal Career might never have happened..

Possibly, the Police might send this to the DA for prosecution of "intent to distribute" type charge regarding a "look alike" drug.

However, DA's worth their salt wouldn't waste their time, and I don't think the Judge would convict.

However, the Public School System is all about ZERO TOLERANCE these days. If you thought Muslim Society is strict, it has nothing on the Education system..

42 posted on 02/11/2006 5:13:13 PM PST by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

but does the school handbook define "look-alike drug"?
and is the policy enforced uniformly?
i suspect a good lawyer could argue that the policy is unclear, vague, overly general, and enforced in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner.


43 posted on 02/11/2006 5:13:21 PM PST by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.
"Sugar is a drug?"

Nope. Who said it was?

Now, powdered sugar in a baggie looks like a drug, especially after joking that it was cocaine. That is against written school policy.

44 posted on 02/11/2006 5:13:48 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Revel
How can something that is not a drug (sugar) be a "look-alike drug"? Don't these people have a basic grasp of the English language, or was that leeched out of them in education classes?

Maybe the powdered sugar wasn't for a science class but for a home economics class, to bake a cake.

45 posted on 02/11/2006 5:15:09 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
East Aurora School District officials declined to comment on the case, citing privacy issues.

We are truly in trouble if our teachers and school administrators are too stupid to tell the difference between cocaine and sugar.

We are. The "privacy issues" are the dumber-than-rocks administrators (some with PhD's, I'll bet, despite IQ's reaching as high as the low 30's) who desperately DON'T want to be tarred and feathered as they deserve.

Besides, they just got angry that the boy's antics took away from "condom practice"...

No cheers, unfortunately.

46 posted on 02/11/2006 5:17:59 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
That is against written school policy.

So, if it becomes against school policy for people to breathe, you would probably advocate that people stop doing that?

47 posted on 02/11/2006 5:18:30 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Don't these people have a basic grasp of the English language, or was that leeched out of them in education classes?

They aren't allowed INTO education majors if they can read and write at more than a 4th grade level (5th grade for education grad school).

Kinda like DU, come to think of it...

Cheers!

48 posted on 02/11/2006 5:20:49 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Revel

The problem most likely is that some of the 60's rejects teaching in this school were mad that it was only sugar to begin with.

If this had happened to my son or daughter I would start a war with these blistering idiots the likes of which they never would have dreamed. I would fight to my last penny and breath to make sure they aree were fired, excluded from teaching and for those absolutly out of their mind police officers and officers of the court I would do the same.

God bless the fact we home school. This is just one more example of why the state has no business having such control over the lives of our children and us as citizens when they lack such basic common sense.


49 posted on 02/11/2006 5:23:40 PM PST by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Well, I guess we shouldn't really expect school officials to understand plain English.

"The school handbook states that students can be suspended or expelled for carrying a look-alike drug."

It doesn't say "look-alike food made to look like a drug." What those idiot sub-humans are doing to that 12-year-old is more harmful than actually using cocain would have been. They are not the least bit interested in the welfare of children, and certainly are not interested in educating them. We're living in a world of control and power freaks who are destroying our children. In this country they are much more dangerous then Islam.

Hank

50 posted on 02/11/2006 5:25:21 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Revel

"Could get probation "Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."

Is it going to jump out of the bag and bite them? What danger? Don't answer that, bureaucrats can make anything dangerous when they want to manipulate behaviour.


51 posted on 02/11/2006 5:28:46 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohhhh
Probably one o dem der white red neck boys the feminazi school authorities hate and desire to subdue.

...And not good looking enough to be the teachers' boy toy.

52 posted on 02/11/2006 5:34:42 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
My guess is that it falls under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance.

"It is unlawful for any person knowingly to manufacture, distribute, advertise, or possess with intent to manufacture or distribute a look‑alike substance. Any person who violates this subsection (b) shall be guilty of a Class 3 felony, the fine for which shall not exceed $150,000."

My guess is that they'll drop this to a 404(c):

"It is unlawful for any person knowingly to possess a look‑alike substance. Any person who violates this subsection (c) is guilty of a petty offense. Any person convicted of a subsequent offense under this subsection (c) shall be guilty of a Class C misdemeanor."

53 posted on 02/11/2006 5:36:20 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
How can something that is not a drug (sugar) be a "look-alike drug"? Don't these people have a basic grasp of the English language, or was that leeched out of them in education classes?

By their definition, a bag of dark dog crap could be a "look-alike drug" for Black Tar Heroin!

Time for all parents to pull their kids from these schools...withhold their taxes for "education funding", and remove each and every one of these proto-Marxists from ANY semblance of power and authority!

54 posted on 02/11/2006 5:38:21 PM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Now, powdered sugar in a baggie looks like a drug, especially after joking that it was cocaine. That is against written school policy.

But how is it that possession of sugar, or any of the various other foods that look like dope, becomes a felony?

55 posted on 02/11/2006 5:38:46 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: drhogan
"but does the school handbook define "look-alike drug"? "

Geez Louise. The kid's got powdered sugar in a baggie. He says it's coke. How much more look-alike can it be?

"i suspect a good lawyer could argue that the policy is unclear, vague, overly general, and enforced in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner."

I suspect he could try.

56 posted on 02/11/2006 5:43:10 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Revel

"Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."

But abortion and pre-marital sex is just fine to encourage at school.

Our Founding Fathers would be ashamed of what we have become.


57 posted on 02/11/2006 5:43:41 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

I did this with a bag of confectionary sugar when I was 7... I told a neighbor girl that it was cocaine... Her dad came over and started screaming at my dad... My dad told him that it was harmless sugar and that it was only a joke... My dad laughed and told the guy to get a life and move on...

The felony is total bs...


58 posted on 02/11/2006 5:44:38 PM PST by ARA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
The district issued a written statement, which said: "The dangers of illegal drugs and controlled substances are clear.

The legacy of Bill Bennett - zealot freakazoids at the mention of a drug - even if its aspirin or sugar

Now if he'd thrown it at the principal, shouting, "ANTHRAX!"...
59 posted on 02/11/2006 5:45:21 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
"So, if it becomes against school policy for people to breathe, you would probably advocate that people stop doing that?"

The best time for arguing in favor of breathing is before it becomes school policy, not after you violate it. This way, you see, you have more credibility.

60 posted on 02/11/2006 5:46:12 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-663 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson