Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New York Times breaks silence
Powerline ^ | 02/12/2006 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 02/12/2006 6:39:05 AM PST by tsmith130

In today's article on the investigation of the leaks underlying the New York Times's December 16 disclosure of the NSA terrorist surveillance program, the Times finally acknowledges its own legal jeopardy:

[C]onservatives have attacked the disclosure of classified information as an illegal act, demanding a vigorous investigative effort to find and prosecute whoever disclosed classified information. An upcoming article in Commentary magazine suggests that the newspaper may be prosecuted for violations of the Espionage Act and says, "What The New York Times has done is nothing less than to compromise the centerpiece of our defensive efforts in the war on terrorism." Unfortunately, however: Bill Keller, executive editor of The Times, said no one at the paper had been contacted in connection with the investigation, and he defended the paper's reporting.

"Before running the story we gave long and sober consideration to the administration's contention that disclosing the program would damage the country's counterterrorism efforts," Mr. Keller said. "We were not convinced then, and have not been convinced since, that our reporting compromised national security."

Here's hoping the adminstration finds the intestinal fortitude to seek to convince a jury of Keller's peers.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: espionage; espionageact; hinderaker; homelandsecurity; jamesrisen; leaks; looselips; nsa; nyt; saboteurs; spying; traitormedia; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Here's hoping is right!
1 posted on 02/12/2006 6:39:06 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

"Conservatives"????

How about "Federal Prosecutors"!?!?


2 posted on 02/12/2006 6:41:07 AM PST by Paloma_55 (Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
"We were not convinced then, and have not been convinced since, that our reporting compromised national security."

I'll remember that during the next act of terrorism on U.S. soil.


3 posted on 02/12/2006 6:43:29 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
We were not convinced then, and have not been convinced since, that our reporting compromised national security.

I was not convinced then, and I'm not convinced now, that robbing the bank because I needed the money was wrong.

4 posted on 02/12/2006 6:43:40 AM PST by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Be carefull, those pink things in the sky are really pigs, and yes, they are flying today. Not only do thay admit it, but once again in the wonderful model of Mary Mapes, they still don't think that it effected National Security...THANK GOD for the fact that THEY DECIDED what is best for the other 300 million Americans...Sick, disgusting, immoral and seditionists...


5 posted on 02/12/2006 6:44:16 AM PST by mhuye (http://theonewhoislost.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Exactly.


6 posted on 02/12/2006 6:44:46 AM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

They should be out of business for it. Treason.


7 posted on 02/12/2006 6:44:49 AM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Yes, and they may have to pursue some congressmen or senators too!


8 posted on 02/12/2006 6:44:56 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

The only the general public will realize we are in a war for our lives is when we take action, serious action against treasonous events. If reporters. operatives, and a senator or two face long prison sentences and receive them, people will begin to understand.

Republican or Democrat, anyone involved in these disclosures should serve serious time in jail.


9 posted on 02/12/2006 6:45:47 AM PST by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Hello? The law requires that the leaks be investigated, not conservatives.


10 posted on 02/12/2006 6:47:24 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Well that's comforting, Bill Keller, newspaper idiot with no idea of national security, says they didn't jeopardize national security. sarc
11 posted on 02/12/2006 6:47:59 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
... and there arose a great chorus of moonbats, chanting "Chill !, Chill !", and the great disturbance in the force was ignored with a yawn, as the usual suspects, bawling and squalling, were dragged away to their impending fate...

[last line of the book "Press Wars: Revenge of the truth"]


12 posted on 02/12/2006 6:48:31 AM PST by xcamel (One should hope Global Dumbing is reversible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Guess we won't hear a whimper when the NYT is incinerated.


13 posted on 02/12/2006 6:48:58 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Gee whiz, guys, I'm convinced that the New York Times damaged our national interest and endangered our people and our military in the field.

Wonder if any of these putzes would be willing to duke it out in Central Park early some Sunday morning?

Bet not ~ the whole lot of them are cowards and traitors.

14 posted on 02/12/2006 6:49:12 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Charge, try and convict Pinch and his cohorts. Publishing our intelligence secrets certainly is more harmful than anything Scooter Libby did. They all need to do jail time and the NYT needs to be fined out of existence for breeching national security for the rest of the nation during wartime.


15 posted on 02/12/2006 6:49:36 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Not just Pinch, but selected executives who manage institutional funds that have New York Times stock in their portfolios.

Let's spread the damage to all the sectors of society who conspired, knowingly or otherwise, in this treachery.

16 posted on 02/12/2006 6:51:15 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

What does it take to get through to these dunderheads? Wild-eyed Muslims renting a van, filling it with fertilizer, etc., and parking it in the lobby of the NYTimes?


17 posted on 02/12/2006 6:53:21 AM PST by hershey (enmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
"We were not convinced then, and have not been convinced since, that our reporting compromised national security."

Maybe a 30 year tour of this place will convince him:


18 posted on 02/12/2006 6:53:31 AM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paguch

Early this am, the three letter word, WAR was spoken and underlined in Fox. As in wake up, folks, we are at WAR.


19 posted on 02/12/2006 6:55:39 AM PST by hershey (enmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Here's hoping the adminstration finds the intestinal fortitude to seek to convince a jury of Keller's peers.

I'm not worried at all about the administration's intestinal fortitude but I doubt the courts would hold up a conviction.

20 posted on 02/12/2006 6:55:46 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson