Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Agencies Review Libby Case Evidence
SFgate ^ | Monday, February 13, 2006 | By TONI LOCY, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 02/13/2006 5:04:44 PM PST by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Perdogg; Howlin; frankjr

MSNBC is reporting that the prosecutor is now saying Libby shouldn't get classified intelligence documents to aid his defense since it would sabotage the case if granted - no duh!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11405739/

The most amazing part is the MSNBC poll:

"Should Lewis Libby be given access to classified documents he may need for his defense?" * 5183 responses

Yes
27%

No
73%

If he NEEDS them for his defense, what are these 3784 morons thinking?!


21 posted on 02/17/2006 9:42:35 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3; frankjr; Howlin

That's fine, throw the case out. It will be sonner or later.


22 posted on 02/17/2006 9:44:03 AM PST by Perdogg (I'd rather go hunting with Cheney, than riding in Ted Kennedy's car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I agree - I am trying to find what Fitzgerald filed (FindLaw and SmokingGun.com does not have it yet) - from the article:

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald suggested that lawyers for I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby were trying to torpedo the government’s case by pressing for the documents, including nearly a year’s worth of the Presidential Daily Brief, a summary of threats to the U.S. that the Bush administration has fiercely guarded in the past.

In court papers filed late Thursday, Fitzgerald also asserted that granting such a request would damage national security and presidential executive privilege. He called it “nothing short of breathtaking.”


23 posted on 02/17/2006 9:59:51 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3; Perdogg; Howlin

"MSNBC is reporting that the prosecutor is now saying Libby shouldn't get classified intelligence documents to aid his defense since it would sabotage the case if granted - no duh!"

Here is Fitz's response to the Libby doc request:
http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/files/Libby_060216.pdf

Justoneminute did a brief write up:
http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2006/02/the_latest_fitz.html


24 posted on 02/17/2006 1:28:33 PM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Thanks - I was not able to find that anywhere - this prosecutor has some balls, I will say that.


25 posted on 02/17/2006 2:03:52 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson