Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam on Tape: Terrorists Will Attack D.C.
Newsmax.com ^ | Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2006 10:53 a.m. EST | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 02/15/2006 8:21:56 AM PST by edpc

Five years before Osama bin Laden attacked the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Saddam Hussein predicted that Washington, D.C. would be struck by terrorists, according to audiotapes set for broadcast tonight on ABC's "Nightline."

In an ABC Radio report to promote the show, the network's lead investigative reporter, Brian Ross, revealed that the FBI translator who leaked the tapes said they contained "damning evidence that the world should know."

In one 10-year-old recording, the Iraqi dictator is said to boast that Washington would be an easy target for a nuclear or biological weapons attack. Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime would not be directly responsible.

In fact, Saddam's 1996 warning of a terrorist attack on Washington was followed up in Iraq's state run press with even more prescient predictions.

On July 21, 2001, less than two months before 9/11, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper Al-Nasiriya carried a column headlined "America, An Obsession Called Osama Bin Ladin." In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the U.S. "with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House."

In 1992, Saddam's son Uday used an editorial in Babil, the newspaper he ran, to warn of Iraqi kamikaze attacks inside America, saying, "Does the United States realize the meaning of every Iraqi becoming a missile that can cross countries and cities?" In the late 1990s, according to UPI, "a cable to Saddam from the chief of Iraqi intelligence was transmitted by Baghdad Radio. The message read, 'We will chase [Americans] to every corner at all times. No high tower of steel will protect them against the fire of truth.'"

After the 9/11 attacks, Saddam became the only world leader to offer praise for bin Laden, even as other terrorist leaders such as Yasser Arafat went out of their way to make a show of sympathy to the U.S. by donating blood for 9/11 victims.

The day after the attacks, in quotes picked up by Agence France-Press, Saddam proclaimed that "America is reaping the thorns planted by its rulers in the world."

"There is hardly a place [in the world] that does not have a memorial symbolizing the criminal actions committed by America against its natives," AFP quoted the Iraqi dictator complaining, based on reports in the Iraqi News agency.

For his part, Uday flat-out praised the 9/11 attacks, saying, "These were courageous operations carried out by young Arabs and Muslims," according to quotes picked up by the Saudi daily Asharq al-Awsat. "Nightline's" broadcast tonight will be based on 12 hours of tapes obtained by ABC News. But that's likely only the tip of the iceberg.

In his April 2005 final report on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer said he had uncovered "a large collection" of recordings of Saddam chairing his Revolutionary Command Council


TOPICS: US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; jihadinamerica; saddam; saddamtapes; wmd

1 posted on 02/15/2006 8:21:57 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Here is some more on this.


2 posted on 02/15/2006 8:22:51 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Should be interesting to watch. Shocking that ABC is airing it.

BTTT


3 posted on 02/15/2006 8:24:44 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Saddam on Tape: Terrorists Will Attack D.C.

The democRATS already beat them to it.

4 posted on 02/15/2006 8:26:20 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Zell Miller talked about this on the floor of the Senate a few years ago:

Less than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)

In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”

The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1106657/posts?page=1


5 posted on 02/15/2006 8:26:36 AM PST by Peach (Hillary ran over a cop and didn't even stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

But...but...I thought there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11. Expect a shortage on tinfoil as the conspiracy nuts come out of the woodwork to explain how "dark forces within the government" have had years to doctor this tape.


6 posted on 02/15/2006 8:32:01 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edpc

When is this being aired??


7 posted on 02/15/2006 8:34:57 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj

"Should be interesting to watch. Shocking that ABC is airing it."

Indeed. I think Brian Ross is a sensationalist boob, and his EXCLUSIVES have often lacked meat.


8 posted on 02/15/2006 8:36:01 AM PST by goarmy (WARNING: The consumption of alcohol is a major factor in dancing like a retard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edpc
But...but...I thought there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11.

I'm still waiting for an explanation as to when the mural our soldiers found in Iraq was painted. In my mind, that was a damning piece of evidence that was all but ignored.

9 posted on 02/15/2006 8:37:39 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
When is this being aired??

Small clue in the first sentence of the article.

10 posted on 02/15/2006 8:39:22 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goarmy

I think they've already got their bases covered in the upcoming denial by the MSM and liberals!

From the article:

"Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime would not be directly responsible."

MSM: "See! We told you there was not DIRECT involvement by Irag!"


11 posted on 02/15/2006 8:40:06 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

not = no


12 posted on 02/15/2006 8:40:59 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: edpc

How can this be when the MSM and assorted liberals has been telling us for years that Iraq posed no threat to the US and had nothing to do with terrorism. </sarcasm


13 posted on 02/15/2006 8:42:23 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
From my files:

In in 1998, an Arab intelligence officer, who knows Saddam personally, predicted in Newsweek: "Very soon you will be witnessing large-scale terrorist activity run by the Iraqis." The Arab official said these terror operations would be run under "false flags" --spook-speak for front groups--including bin Laden's organization.

Then there were the predictions by an Iraqi with ties to Iraqi intelligence, Naeem Abd Mulhalhal, in Qusay's own newspaper several weeks before the attacks that stated bin Laden would “demolish the Pentagon after he destroys the White House and ”bin Laden would strike America “on the arm that is already hurting.” (referencing a second IRAQI sponsored attack on the World Trade Center). Another reference to New York was “[bin Laden] will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra everytime he hears his songs.” (e.g., “New York, New York”) which identified New York, New York as a target. Mulhalhal also stated, “The wings of a dove and the bullet are all but one and the same in the heart of a believer." which references an airplane attack.

The Arabic language daily newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabic also cited the cooperation between Iraq, bin Laden and Al December 1998 editorial, which predicted that “President Saddam Hussein, whose country was subjected to a four day air strike, will look for support in taking revenge on the United States and Britain by cooperating with Saudi oppositionist Osama Bin-Laden, whom the United States considers to be the most wanted person in the world.” This info is in the link provided below. How could these people have had foreknowledge without Iraq being involved?

Source for this info

Warning...slow loading .pdf file. This was from a lawsuit filed against Iraq after 9/11...the court ruled against Iraq.

There was also another lawsuit filed by the family of John O’Neill (a former FBI agent who captured Ramzi Yousef after the 1993 WTC bombings) after he died in the WTC on 9/11. His personal files from his years of traveling around the world investigating al-Qaeda are were used as evidence in the lawsuit. The evidence includes documents unearthed in the headquarters of the Mukhabarat (Iraq's intelligence service) and information gleaned from the interrogation of both al-Qaeda and Iraqi prisoners. (Link below). It also quotes Vincent Cannistraro, the former CIA counter-terrorism chief, who stated in October 2000 that Iraq had been wanting to carry out terrorist attacks, and that the Iraqi military had been in contact with Osama bin Laden.

Click Here

We know from these IIS documents that beginning in 1992 the former Iraqi regime regarded bin Laden as an Iraqi Intelligence asset. We know from IIS documents that the former Iraqi regime provided safe haven and financial support to an Iraqi who has admitted to mixing the chemicals for the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. We know from IIS documents that Saddam Hussein agreed to Osama bin Laden's request to broadcast anti-Saudi propaganda on Iraqi state-run television. We know from IIS documents that a "trusted confidante" of bin Laden stayed for more than two weeks at a posh Baghdad hotel as the guest of the Iraqi Intelligence Service.

Abu Nidal, September 11 and Saddam The terrorist network may be closer knit than we think.

Weekly Standard: The Mother of All Connections

List of newspaper article in the 90's which mention the world's concern regarding the growing relationship between OBL and Saddam:

Click here

Son of Saddam coordinates OBL activities:

Click here

The AQ connection (excellent):

Click here

Western Nightmare:

Click here

Saddam's link to OBL:

Click here

NYT: Iraq and AQ agree to cooperate:

Click here

Document linking them:

Click here

Iraq and terrorism - no doubt about it:

Click here

A federal judge rules there are links:

Click here

Wall Street Journal on Iraq and AQ:

Click here

Iraq and Iran contact OBL:

Click here

More evidence:

Click here

Saddam's AQ connection:

Click here

Further connections:

Click here

What a court of law said about the connections:

Click here

Some miscellaneous stuff on connections:

Click here

Saddam's Ambassador to Al Qaeda: (February 2004, Weekly Standard)

Click here

Yes - it's NewsMax but loaded with interesting bullet points.

Click here

Saddam's Fingerprints on NY Bombing (Wall Street Journal, June 1993)

Click here

Colin Powell: Iraq and AQ Partners for Years (CNN, February 2003)

Click here

The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connections (September 2003, Richard Miniter)

Click here

Oil for Food Scandal Ties Iraq and Al Qaeda (June 2003)

Click here

Saddam and OBL Make a Pact (The New Yorker, February 2003):

Click here

Al Qaeda's Poison Gas (Wall Street Journal, April 2004):

Click here

Wolfowitz Says Saddam behind 9/11 Attacks:

Click here

Saddam behind first WTC attack - PBS, Laurie Mylroie:

Click here

Growing Evidence of Saddam and Al Qaeda Link, The Weekly Standard, July 2003:

Click here

Qusay Hussein Coordinated Iraq special operations with Bin Laden Terrorist Activities, Yossef Bodansky, National Press Club

Click here

The Western Nightmare: Saddam and Bin Laden vs. the Rest of the World, The Guardian Unlimited:

Click here

Saddam Link to Bin Laden, Julian Borger, The Guardian, February 1999

Click here

The Al Qaeda Connection, The Weekly Standard, July 2003

Click here

Cheney lectures Russert on Iraq/911 Link, September 2003:

Click here

No Question About It, National Review, September 2003

Click here

Iraq: A Federal Judges Point of View

Click here

Mohammed's Account links Iraq to 9/11 and OKC:

Click here

Free Republic Thread that mentions some books Freepers might be interested in on this topic:

Click here

The Proof that Saddam Worked with AQ, The Telegraph, April 2003:

Click here

Saddam's AQ Connection, The Weekly Standard, September 2003

Click here

September 11 Victims Sue Iraq:

Click here

Osama's Best Friend: The Further Connections Between Al Qaeda and Saddam, The Weekly Standard, November 2003

Click here

Terrorist Behind 9/11 Attacks Trained by Saddam, The Telegraph, December 2003

Click here

James Woolsey Links Iraq and AQ, CNN Interview, March 2004, Also see Posts #34 and #35

Click here

A Geocities Interesting Web Site with maps and connections:

Click here

Bin Laden indicted in federal court, read down to find information that Bin Laden agreed to not attack Iraq and to work cooperatively with Iraq:

Click here

Case Closed, The Weekly Standard, November 03

Click here

CBS - Lawsuit: Iraq involved in 9/11:

Click here

Exploring Iraq's Involvement in pre-9/11 Acts, The Indianapolis Star:

Click here

The Iraq/AQ Connection: Richard Minister again

Click here

Militia Defector says Baghdad trained Al Qaeda fighters in chemical weapons, July 2002

Click here

The Clinton View of Iraq/AQ Ties, The Weekly Standard, December 2003

Click here

Saddam Controlled the Camps (Iraq/AQ Ties): The London Observer, November 01

Click here

Saddam's Terror Ties that Critics Ignore, National Review, October 2003:

Click here

Tape Shows General Wesley Clark linking Iraq and AQ:

Click here

The Missing Link (What the Senate Ingelligence Report Said about Iraq/AQ Connections) Click Here

Credit to Peach for the above info.

Credit to joesbucks for the following links:

Dozens of links here:

Click here

Just a few of those links include:

The Clinton Justice Department's indictment against OBL in federal court which mentions the terrorist's connections to Iraq. November 4, 1998. The federal indictment:

Click here

Iraq and AQ agree to cooperate. The federal indictment against OBL working in concert with Iraq and Iran is mentioned. November 1998. The New York Times

Click here

Saddam reaching out to OBL January 1, 1999. Newsweek

Click here

ABC news reports on the Osama/Saddam connections January 14, 1999. ABC News

Click here

Western Nightmare: Saddam and OBL versus the World. Iraq recruited OBL. February 6, 1999. The Guardian

Click here

Saddam's Link to OBL February 6, 1999. The Guardian

Click here

Saddam offered asylum to bin Laden February 13, 1999. AP

Click here

And kabar submitted these two little gems showing Bin Laden supported Iraq and its struggle against the US and the West.

1996 Fatwa: "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places."

1998 Text of Fatwah Urging Jihad Against Americans

14 posted on 02/15/2006 8:43:00 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Sounds to me like ABC is attempting to establish some "we were already on the story" cred when even more "damning" information from Saddam's tapes becomes available soon.
15 posted on 02/15/2006 8:44:48 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Oh no! Will the department Santa be next? I suppose it shouldn't be a surprise. Ice cream men have been busted for selling pot and crack out of their trucks in numerous cities.
In the 70s in St. Petersburg many of the ice cream drivers were Outlaws and Pagans out supporting their motorcycles and they sold lots of different flavors of "ice cream."


16 posted on 02/15/2006 8:47:46 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
ABCNEWS PLANS AIRING OF SADDAM TAPES TONIGHT: Saddam talking with his advisors about hitting Washington with WMD, hiding weapons, etc... Developing...

Drudge headline for now...

17 posted on 02/15/2006 8:49:03 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Nice collection. Thanks for posting.

Bookmark


18 posted on 02/15/2006 8:51:21 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the U.S. "with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House."

In the late 1990s, according to UPI, "a cable to Saddam from the chief of Iraqi intelligence was transmitted by Baghdad Radio. The message read, 'We will chase [Americans] to every corner at all times. No high tower of steel will protect them against the fire of truth.'"

Remember these the next time Stephanopoulos, Matthews, Russert, Blitzer, Hamilton, Kean or Kerry allude to Iraq being a mistake.

19 posted on 02/15/2006 8:51:58 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Have I ever mentioned that I have a "visual perception" problem? Read it twice...:(


20 posted on 02/15/2006 8:56:13 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edpc

This is just one more instance of information being held by the US that would justify the Administration's concerns about Iraq.

Can anyone explain why these tapes and all the translated documents are being withheld under security classifications?


21 posted on 02/15/2006 8:57:29 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

"Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime would not be directly responsible. "

The media will misrepresent this as "Iraq posed no direct threat to America."


22 posted on 02/15/2006 9:00:02 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
People will read Saddam's statement differently. His denial of "direct" responsibility is confirmation of his "indirect" involvement.

9-11, As always, Usama had the "delivery methods" and "structural" info down pat. Saddam is a "maker" of WMD. Together they are probably the most dangerous people in the world. Going into Iraq was the right thing to do.

I still believe that Saddam was the "maker" of the anthrax...either directly or indirectly.

23 posted on 02/15/2006 9:00:16 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj

That mural...Was it the same as the calendars?


24 posted on 02/15/2006 9:01:14 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
Can anyone explain why these tapes and all the translated documents are being withheld under security classifications?

It's a pure guess on my part, but I suppose there is a lot of detailed information about sources and networks that may need to be investigated further. If you open them to full public scrutiny, it may jeopardize ongoing operations, as the NYT exposure of NSA survelliance may have.

25 posted on 02/15/2006 9:02:56 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I still believe that Saddam was the "maker" of the anthrax...either directly or indirectly.

You and me both. I also think some of Saddam's high-level intelligence agents provided, at a minimum, logistical support to the 9/11 terrorists, and perhaps even direct training.

The original Gulf War in '91 never really ended in Saddam's mind, and he was actively seeking revenge against us for driving him out of Kuwait for all those years afterwards.

26 posted on 02/15/2006 9:04:07 AM PST by jpl ("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
It will be spun to try and damage the President. "See! He should have know."

There will be no mention of the link between Saddam and Osama.

If I'm wrong, I will be ecstatic. But I'm not going to get my hopes up.
27 posted on 02/15/2006 9:05:10 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

"Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime COULD NOT BE SEEN as directly responsible."


There, fixed it.


28 posted on 02/15/2006 9:06:25 AM PST by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

Thanks.

I knew it was missing something!


29 posted on 02/15/2006 9:08:46 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

No. It was a painting on a large wall of planes flying into the towers with a picture of Sadsam smoking a cigar and gloating.


30 posted on 02/15/2006 9:10:44 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: edpc

ping


31 posted on 02/15/2006 9:15:48 AM PST by N2Gems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Here's a link with picture

http://www.nationalreview.com/images/mural3.jpg


32 posted on 02/15/2006 9:21:05 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: edpc

BTTT!


33 posted on 02/15/2006 9:26:07 AM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Thank you so much for all your hard work! I believe folks will be using your well documented list in the very near future. BTTT


34 posted on 02/15/2006 9:27:21 AM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: edpc

In other words...

The spin will be that the Bush administration should have known what was coming.


35 posted on 02/15/2006 9:28:30 AM PST by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
when the mural our soldiers found in Iraq was painted.

The first place I saw that painting was on a wall in one of Saddam's palaces when they went into Bagdad and took over the palace for a headquarters.

It was there when the Army was showing the insides of the palace. It also showed the bathrooms with solid gold fixtures.

The video did not make any special effort to show the painting. It was visible when they were walking through the palace.

36 posted on 02/15/2006 9:39:15 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edpc

The documents and tapes I'm talking about were among those swept up in the various ministries of Iraq after the invasion.

There's nothing secret about those opearations or methods, it was called shock and awe. Some investigative reporter has been trying to get them declassified for years.


37 posted on 02/15/2006 9:40:18 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: edpc
"Bush lied! He made up the evidence about ... er, whatwasthatyousaid? ... Saddam? he did!?! really? it was authenticated? the hell you say! ... nevermind."
38 posted on 02/15/2006 9:43:58 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
I'm still waiting for an explanation as to when the mural our soldiers found in Iraq was painted.

I am more concerned with the why than the when in this instance. The detail, specifically where the buildings were hit, seems to point to a post-attack artist rendering. However, if Saddam had noting to do with it, why would he sanction a painting (everyone knows nothing like this happened in Iraq without his knowledge and consent) showing him associated with the 9/11 attack? I'd also be interested in knowing the translation of the Arabic writing under his image.


39 posted on 02/15/2006 9:54:16 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Uday is "DU" in pig Latin.


40 posted on 02/15/2006 9:56:26 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Remember Susan Lindenauer, the distant relative of White House staffer Andy Card? She very well might have had advance warning about the 9/11 attacks. Check this out:

One conversation John had with his sister in the summer of 2001 stuck in his mind for a different reason. ''So she goes, 'Listen, the gulf war isn't over,''' he told me over dinner at a sushi place on the Sunset Strip. '''There are plans in effect right now. They will be raining down on us from the skies.''' His sister told him that Lower Manhattan would be destroyed. ''And I was like, Yeah, whatever,'' he continued. When he woke up six weeks later to the news that two planes had crashed into the twin towers, and watched as ash settled on the window ledge of his sublet in Brooklyn, he had a dislocating sense of having his reality replaced by Susan's strange world -- an experience he would have again when he learned that his sister had been arrested by the F.B.I.

Parke Godfrey, a close friend of Lindauer's for the last 15 years, is a professor of computer science at York University in Ontario. He says that Lindauer warned him not to take a job at N.Y.U. the summer before the Sept. 11 attacks. That Lindauer's outlandish predictions actually came true, Godfrey suggests, further encouraged the exalted sense of personal mission that brought her to Washington in the first place.

http://freerepublic.info/focus/f-news/1202474/posts

41 posted on 02/15/2006 10:14:03 AM PST by jpl ("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson