Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Translator: ABC Re-interpreted Tapes
NewsMax ^ | 2/17/06

Posted on 02/17/2006 10:45:00 AM PST by areafiftyone

The FBI translator who supplied the 12-hours of Saddam Hussein audiotapes excerpted by ABC's "Nightline" Wednesday night now says the network discarded his translations and went with a less threatening version of the Iraqi dictator's comments.

"What you heard on ABC News was their translation," former U.N. weapons inspector Bill Tierney told ABC Radio's Sean Hannity on Thursday.

"They came up with something different on a key element regarding terrorism in the United States," Tierney insisted.

In the "Nightline" version of a 1996 recording, Saddam predicts that Washington, D.C. would be hit by terrorists. But he adds that Iraq would have nothing to do with the attack.

Tierney says, however, that what Saddam actually said was much more sinister. "He was discussing his intent to use chemical weapons against the United States and use proxies so it could not be traced back to Iraq," he told Hannity.

In a passage not used by "Nightline," Tierney says Saddam declares: "Terrorism is coming . . . . In the future there will be terrorism with weapons of mass destruction. What if we consider this technique, with smuggling?"

Tierney's full translations are set for release this weekend by The Intelligence Group in Washington, D.C.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abc; abcbias; abcdisney; abcnews; billtierney; disneynews; fakebutaccurate; hannity; huntforwmd; intelligencesummit; iraq; mediabias; nationalsecurity; revisionisthistory; saddam911link; saddamites; saddamstapes; saddamswmds; saddamtapes; saddamwmdlink; softsell; statesponsoredterror; tierney; waltsrotatingcorpse; waronterror; waronterrorism; whywefight; wmd; wot; youjobiniraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: Shermy

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20154


41 posted on 02/17/2006 11:04:34 AM PST by pookie18 ([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Holy crap! You know, I'm so damned tired of the MSM. They serve absolutely no useful purpose anymore. None.


42 posted on 02/17/2006 11:05:50 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Even Saddam's generals were expecting to use WMD on the invading army; the fact that he didn't have any took all of them by surprise.

Several UN inspectors have said that they went to Syria; we've all seen reports that Russia helped to organize the evacuation of these materials to Syria, and we've seen reports of the convoys crossing the border during the run-up to the war.

I'm not surprised that Bush's enemies don't want to talk about this. What mystifies me is why Bush doesn't talk about it. The two possible reasons are that, first, it would set us on a collision course with Syria, and he isn't ready yet...

Or two, that this was the most successful operation of the war. Saddam was convinced to voluntarily ship his weapons out of the country, and he was convinced by Putin to do it. It doesn't matter that Syria has them, because Syria already has tons of their own. What matters is that Saddam was denied their use at the moment he most needed them, and he was denied their use by his own decision, thanks to a game run against him by Putin and his "ally" in Syria, who sold him out, or maybe was an unwitting enabler.

Which might explain why Bush can't take credit for his greatest coup of the war, and also why, in his eyes, Putin can do no wrong.


43 posted on 02/17/2006 11:06:05 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

And you can be sure Isikoff won't cover the more sinister tranlation either. Stinking quisling.


44 posted on 02/17/2006 11:06:27 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Looks like ABC git disinformation out there first to make it look like what comes next would be false.

Wonder if they are working for the terrorists?
45 posted on 02/17/2006 11:06:53 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Looks like ABC git disinformation out there first to make it look like what comes next would be false.

Wonder if they are working for the terrorists?
46 posted on 02/17/2006 11:06:53 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
This makes me absolutely furious! If true, this goes way beyond liberal bias. This is conspiracy to commit fraud.
47 posted on 02/17/2006 11:08:50 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone


More Media Bias ..... OR TREASON


48 posted on 02/17/2006 11:08:56 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

ABC is apparently Saddam's defense counsel.

Disgusting.


49 posted on 02/17/2006 11:10:55 AM PST by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD

Remember with CBS RatherGate even the actual documents were frauds.


50 posted on 02/17/2006 11:11:21 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
What we need is the transcripts in the original language and someone who can provide a word for word translation to verify what side is correct without question.

ABC learned a lesson from Dan Rather - "Don't let Freepers see the original documents, ever!"

51 posted on 02/17/2006 11:11:58 AM PST by KarlInOhio (In this year's White House play, Henry VI part II, VP Cheney got the role of Dick the Butcher.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

ABC= All Bull Crap


52 posted on 02/17/2006 11:12:03 AM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (God makes us strong for alittle while so that we can protect the weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
What's incredible is that our MSM is trying to protect Saddam Hussein while simultaneously trying to bring down the Vice-President during a time of war over weapons.

-PJ

53 posted on 02/17/2006 11:14:06 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Well DUH! I'm so glad I didn't waste the DVR space. Gawd, I should really learn Arabic!


54 posted on 02/17/2006 11:16:56 AM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Typical.


55 posted on 02/17/2006 11:18:17 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

That's enough. Everyone involved at ABC News should lose their jobs. If they can't do an honest job of reporting something, they shouldn't be in the news business. It's a license to mislead the public.


56 posted on 02/17/2006 11:18:17 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1curiousmind

Nada.... not even within the city. And there were never any reports of nukes/bombs smuggled through it. They tested the layers of soil for any residuals and it came up negative. A nuke would have left traces. :)


57 posted on 02/17/2006 11:19:29 AM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"To quote ABC: "More Americans get their news from ABC than any other source..."

Should read - "More Americans get more Bull*hit from ABC than any other source..."

58 posted on 02/17/2006 11:19:56 AM PST by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

So that explains ABC's interest in the first place.
We all wondered why a MSM outlet would bother with this as it doesn't fit the agenda. We now know they are attempting to soften what comes out.
No matter what we learn from these tapes and others in the future, do not expect your neo-Marxy friend to all-of-a-sudden change his tune...they'll never admit they were wrong. They'll be helped by the media pooh-poohing any revelations.


59 posted on 02/17/2006 11:20:17 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
I haven't found any further articles on this subject but I'll post the link to the thread anyway...

Kofi Annan says Saddam's WMD admission irrelevant, we should just "move on"

60 posted on 02/17/2006 11:20:24 AM PST by weegee ("...the left can only take power through deception" -W. Chambers, former mem of Communist Party USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson