Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Frist's Cheney Defense Leaves Bob Schieffer Fuming
NewsMax ^ | 2/19/06 | NewsMax

Posted on 02/19/2006 10:53:39 AM PST by wagglebee

Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist told CBS "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer on Sunday that Democrats were playing "partisan politics" with Dick Cheney's hunting accident last weekend - a charge that left Mr. Schieffer fuming.

"What America does not want to see is what happened right afterwards, and that is that the Democratic leadership tried to inject partisan politics into what is a very, very tragic accident," First told Schieffer, who bristled at the remarks.

"But Senator," the veteran newsman protested, "ah - I mean - didn't - didn't - shouldn't [the hunting accident] have been made public but for no other reason than the administration and the vice president's own good? I mean, one can understand that he clearly was not thinking straight. Who would, after thinking they'd killed their best friend?"

Schieffer continued to insist that Democrat attacks on Cheney were legitimate, then asked: "Has the vice president become of liability to the White House? Has he become a liability to your party?"

Frist countered: "Absolutely not. Absolutely not. He is a bold leader. He understands and works very closely with the vision of the President of the United States in securing America's future for a safer, stronger country. That means he has to be both a leader as well as a participant and I think he does it very, very well."

Moments later, the Tennessee Republican reiterated: "I don't think it is appropriate to inject partisan politics into this particular incident."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; anothercudchewer; billfrist; bobschieffer; cheneyshooting; democrats; dickcheney; frist; harrywhittington; mediabias; scheissferbrains; timetoretire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
"But Senator," the veteran newsman protested, "ah - I mean - didn't - didn't - shouldn't [the hunting accident] have been made public but for no other reason than the administration and the vice president's own good? I mean, one can understand that he clearly was not thinking straight. Who would, after thinking they'd killed their best friend?"

What an absolute fool Schieffer is, Cheney knew Whittington was fine, his medical staff was treating him within seconds. It was an ACCIDENT. Why doesn't Schieffer call Ted Kennedy in an ask him these same questions?

1 posted on 02/19/2006 10:53:41 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

LOL What's surprising about Scheiffer's reaction? Isn't he MSM?


2 posted on 02/19/2006 10:59:34 AM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yes, let's beat the dead horse and try to make him gallop. Giddyap!


3 posted on 02/19/2006 11:01:52 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This is how Chuck Hagel would speak in the bizzaro world.


4 posted on 02/19/2006 11:02:18 AM PST by new yorker 77 (Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I mean, one can understand that he clearly was not thinking straight. Who would, after thinking they'd killed their best friend?"

I see Schieffer is doing his best to move the story to the next plateau.

And why doesn't he know that Whittington is NOT Cheney's 'best friend?'

5 posted on 02/19/2006 11:05:29 AM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"I mean, one can understand that he clearly was not thinking straight."

Well Bill, it is clear that people like your own raggedy assed self have the monopoly on "not thinking straight."

6 posted on 02/19/2006 11:05:29 AM PST by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: wagglebee

It's incredible that he said that, just incredible. I said before I thought the dems were imploding, but maybe it's actually the MSM. The democrats really haven't been the ones blowing this out of all proportion.


8 posted on 02/19/2006 11:08:05 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

You hit the nail on the head with Bubba, I have wondered for a long time what really happened at Greg Norman's....anyone a good friend of Greg's? Inquiring minds etc.


9 posted on 02/19/2006 11:10:25 AM PST by GrannyK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
Yes, let's beat the dead horse and try to make him gallop. Giddyap!

Haha! What part of that dog won't hunt does Bob not understand? Just imagine what last Sundays talk shows would have been like if the story got out Saturday night.

10 posted on 02/19/2006 11:10:39 AM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I mean, one can understand that he clearly was not thinking straight. Who would, after thinking they'd killed their best friend?"
I see Schieffer is doing his best to move the story to the next plateau.

SCHIEFFER IS AN IDIOT. YOU CAN"T FIX STUPID>>>>

Re: Post Shooting Procedures
>
> Special note to my customers, friends and fans --
>
> The following rules generally apply after a shooting incident (accidental
> or self-defense), whether you are the Vice President of the United States
> or not. Thanks to my friend Dr. Bruce Eimer, Ph.D., a clinical and
> forensic psychologist, for reminding me of these important basics, and
> providing facts. For some mysterious reason, little of this has come out
> in news reports.
>
> 1. All shooting incidents are traumatic for the good guys, especially when
> innocent people have been hurt.
>
> 2. Post-shooting trauma is REAL and every good person involved in a
> shooting incident gets it. Sleeplessness, flashbacks, disorientation,
> remorse, malaise and other post-trauma symptoms are routine, expected and
> must be dealt with.
>
> 3. You have no legal obligation to contact or talk to the press, and
> defense attorneys advise against doing so.
>
> 4. A person is least capable of making a coherent and consistent
> statement, with good word choices and chronological accuracy, immediately
> after a shooting incident, even though the urge to talk is typically
> great, and everyone around you will encourage it.
>
> 5. Knowing this, the police have adopted good standard procedures you can
> use as a guide. Remove yourself from all public contact, and go on
> "administrative leave" (with pay), until an official statement can be
> released in writing, in cooperation with a team of lawyers, within two
> weeks.
>
> 6. No statement of any kind should be made until conferring with
> attorneys.
>
> 7. You are advised against talking with police unless your lawyer is
> present.
>
> 8. The first concern must be for an injured party. Timely reporting to law
> enforcement authorities is also essential, and it would be improper for
> police to leak this to the press (both rules were observed in the Cheney
> incident).
>
> 9. Allow yourself time to appropriately psychologically process your
> post-shooting psychological trauma, and debrief this critical incident for
> 24 to 48 hours. Only then should you consider making a statement to the
> press, the authorities, or anyone. Expressing sadness, contrition and
> assuming FULL responsibility for the accident (as Cheney did in this case)
> is appropriate.
>
> 10. Do everything you can to avoid such situations.
>
>
> Alan (with a lot of help from Bruce).
>
>
> Contact:
> Alan Korwin
> BLOOMFIELD PRESS
> "We publish the gun laws."
> 4718 E. Cactus #440
> Phoenix, AZ 85032
> 602-996-4020 Phone
> 602-494-0679 FAX
> 1-800-707-4020 Orders
> http://www.gunlaws.com


11 posted on 02/19/2006 11:11:32 AM PST by CHICAGOFARMER (12 TH GENERATION PATROIT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Just imagine what last Sundays talk shows would have been like if the story got out Saturday night.

Exactly, that's why the press is so indignant, because Cheney timed things right to keep this off the Sunday news last week. There is (almost) no fury like the press scorned.

He is one clever dude, that Dick Cheney.

12 posted on 02/19/2006 11:12:40 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I just wonder how much longer Schieffer and the rest of those stiffs are going to take before they realize that they've already shot themselves in the foot with this "story" to the point that they've no aiming points left below their own crotch.


13 posted on 02/19/2006 11:13:24 AM PST by Unrepentant VN Vet (Target too close for missiles; switching to guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Shieffer is now fuming? Add that to steaming and stinking.


14 posted on 02/19/2006 11:13:36 AM PST by DoNotDivide (Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

... I said before I thought the dems were imploding, but maybe it's actually the MSM. The democrats really haven't been the ones blowing this out of all proportion.

**
The MSM is the Ministry of Information for the Democratic Party, so your separation is not logical.


15 posted on 02/19/2006 11:17:40 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
But Senator," the veteran newsman protested, "ah - I mean - didn't - didn't - shouldn't [the hunting accident] have been made public but for no other reason than the administration and the vice president's own good? I mean, one can understand that he clearly was not thinking straight. Who would, after thinking they'd killed their best friend?"

But, but, Bob! Shouldn't have Dan Rather admitted that he was a partician hack using a partician hack to try to rob Bush or re-election by using easily verifiable forged documents? I mean when a blogger in pajamas can out investigate 60 Minutes, don't you think theres a news credibility problem?

16 posted on 02/19/2006 11:17:44 AM PST by Bommer (Ted Kennedy - Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Despite their continued whining; the MSM is not one of the branches of government. The only reason to cooperate with the press to insure balanced coverage of events. Since the current press is a partisan mouth piece for the opposition, there is no up side to cooperating with them. This could become an object lesson for the MSM if they could only grasp the concept of reporting about the news.


17 posted on 02/19/2006 11:18:47 AM PST by Steamburg (Pretenders everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

Dan Ratherbiased is probably holed-up in a Kinko's somewhere working on a letter where Cheney said he was going to shoot Whittington someday.


18 posted on 02/19/2006 11:19:11 AM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

But wait. All of this silly, silly, coverage is backfiring. The MSM is continuing to commit suicide. They apparently have no idea how bad they look.

While this is not a scientific survey I'm running into lots of people, not all of whom are Republicans, who thing the MSM has come unglued.

What's beginning to be clear to even casual followers of politics is that the MSM are trying to do the Democrats work for them BECASUE THEY ARE DEMOCRATS too.


19 posted on 02/19/2006 11:19:50 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
shouldn't [the hunting accident] have been made public but for no other reason than the administration and the vice president's own good?

How was the shooting not made public, Bobette - you sniveling, self-righteous prick?  Were the appropriate local law enforcement officials not notified?  

Beyond that, what requirement of public notification is there in this circumstance?

20 posted on 02/19/2006 11:19:58 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson