Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2006 8:27:42 AM PST by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: LouAvul

Man, no where in the 2nd do I see an age requirement.


2 posted on 02/23/2006 8:29:52 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

This one has your name written all over it!


3 posted on 02/23/2006 8:31:18 AM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
I'm willing to bet that the kid did not know he was breaking the law.

Just because WE know it's wrong doesn't mean KIDS know it.

Plus, you've got the immaturity factor. Kids inherently don't have good judgment. That's what maturation accomplishes.

4 posted on 02/23/2006 8:33:27 AM PST by FReepaholic (If ignorance ain't bliss, I don't know what is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething
"The photos were very disturbing, and while the content was not a direct threat, we just felt it was important for us to take appropriate disciplinary action," Kaufman said, adding the student could be expelled.

When your son's friend came to pick him up today, your son had three (toy) shotguns sticking out of his backpack, a (toy) M-16 with grenade launcher in his hand and a (toy) pistol in a holster on his hip.

I realize these guns aren't real, but it begs the question if perhaps he is in need of appropriate disciplinary action ...

5 posted on 02/23/2006 8:34:53 AM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

After seven paragraphs, I am then able to figure out what state this is in.


7 posted on 02/23/2006 8:37:21 AM PST by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

Of all the stuff going on at Myspace.com this is the least offensive.


8 posted on 02/23/2006 8:38:19 AM PST by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

Being photographed with some guns in your own private home is a crime?!?! I'm scratching Colorado off my list of possible vacation destinations.


10 posted on 02/23/2006 8:40:13 AM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

All I can see for sure that he did is to pose, somewhere, with some guns, and put the photos on the internet. No threat whatsoever to the school or any other soul.

So he should be found Not Guilty on the three misdemeanor possession charges, and then he should sue the bejeebers out of everybody.


13 posted on 02/23/2006 8:41:06 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
The country has grown so overregulated that posting any picture of yourself can probably be used as evidence that you broke some law or other.

IMO, all laws should have a sunset of not more than twenty years. That's the only way I can think of to keep the byers mucked out sufficiently.

14 posted on 02/23/2006 8:41:07 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

Well if it's illegal to post pics of yourself with guns on MySpace, I'll be waiting for BATFE to come knocking any minute now...

...any minute...

...now?...

how about...

...now?


16 posted on 02/23/2006 8:43:24 AM PST by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
My friend Just canceled her Myspace.com account because I told her about all the horrible things that happen to kids. even kids who think they can handle anything get hurt. I never have or will have an account with one of those web sites!
17 posted on 02/23/2006 8:43:48 AM PST by Reaper FReeper (sometimes I wonder what ADD is, but than I find myself chasing a butterfly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
adding the student could be expelled.

Suspended and possibly expelled from school for having taken pictures of himself with guns at home? How can the school do that?

18 posted on 02/23/2006 8:44:01 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee; Joe Brower; Mr. Mojo; DaveLoneRanger
lets see how many constitutional amendments were violated here.Obviously the 2nd but also the 1st(photojournalism bloggers count as journalist according to scotus.)The 4th and probably some articles in the body of the constitution itself. (Life liberty the pursuit of happiness.)This kind of hoplophobic bulls**t pisses me off to no end.

The kid was in his own home posing with guns wich is not a violation of any law on the books.In almost every state in the nation children can go hunting starting at 10 years old and younger.There were some storys on freerepublic about 8 year old girls bagging deer and bears are we goingot bust out the child model handcuffs and send in the swat team to lead them away to barbies malibu bighouse?.

29 posted on 02/23/2006 8:51:27 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
Here is some good analysis by David Kopel - it's a freakin' federal law:

How Strict are U.S., Colorado, and Local Gun Control Laws?

3. Handgun Possession by Minors

It is illegal for a minor to possess a handgun, with certain exceptions. It is illegal for an adult to transfer a handgun to a minor:

18 U.S.C. 922(x):

"(x)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to sell, deliver, or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile...

(A) a handgun;...

(2) It shall be unlawful for any person who is a juvenile to knowingly possess...

(A) a handgun;..."

There are some exceptions allowing juveniles to possess handguns while ranching or farming, or engaged in lawful target shooting or hunting. But even then, current federal law demands that the juvenile have prior written permission from her parents, and must carry that permission at all times with her while in possession of the handgun.

It would be a mistake to think that teenagers helping on their parents' ranches and farms are actually complying with this silly statute. On the ranch, they do not carry around prior written permission. Off the ranch, they may carry a handgun in their pickup truck for protection while driving on isolated rural roads at night, as people in their family have for many generations. It is doubtful that most farmers and ranchers even know of the federal statute--or have much interest in studying it.

For a lot of people, federal gun laws have become like the Internal Revenue Code: it exists, but the populace dislikes it, evades it, and does not want to waste energy trying to understand it. The Tax Code and the gun laws and regulations are frustrating, arcane laws which are genuinely understood by only a small group of specialists. We have seen how the citizenry feels about the Tax Code and the IRS. It would be naïve in the extreme to believe that firearms owners do not have the same opinions of the gun laws and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.

Current proposals in Congress would make the juvenile gun ban even worse. Senate Bill 254 (which is currently in a conference committee), would a mandatory one year minimum sentence on any adult who transfers a handgun to a juvenile, regardless of the circumstances. A father who gives a family heirloom in a locked glass case to a son on the son’s seventeenth birthday would spend a mandatory year in prison. Mandatory sentences may make good sound bites, but they are cruel and thoughtless when applied in the real world.

Senate Bill 254 would also extend the juvenile handgun ban to possession of so-called "assault weapons" and to ammunition clips holding more than 10 rounds. Magazines holding more than 10 rounds for rifles or handguns are commonly used for target shooting, for predator control, for self-defense, and for other lawful and enjoyable purposes, such as plinking at tin cans. If a 17-year-old can be trusted with a rifle and a 10-round magazine, it does not make sense to turn him and his parents into criminals just for using a 15 round magazine instead of a 10 round magazine.

As for "semiautomatic assault weapons," the very name is an oxymoron. One semiautomatic rifle (e.g., a Marlin Camp Carbine) functions just like any other (e.g., a Colt AR-15A2). The federal "assault weapon" ban applies to some but not all semiautomatics, and classifies guns on the basis of petty cosmetic characteristics--such as whether the gun has a bayonet lug, or whether the magazine protrudes "conspicuously" from the rest of the gun. So-called "assault weapons" do not fire faster, or fire larger bullets, than other firearms. There is no reasonable basis for sending parents and children to prison because a child’s lawfully-used rifle has a bayonet lug or some other cosmetically incorrect feature.

32 posted on 02/23/2006 8:53:49 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

On what grounds can the school suspend the student? If he didn't take guns to school and there was no direct threat, I don't understand how they can justify suspending him!


43 posted on 02/23/2006 9:11:51 AM PST by Vasilli22 (http://www.richardfest.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
This is the 2nd thread in as many days about a kid arrested for gun law violations after posting pics on myspace.com.

I'm thinking that people who care about their guns and privacy should not posting pics of them on the internet.

46 posted on 02/23/2006 9:17:21 AM PST by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

for later reading....


47 posted on 02/23/2006 9:20:14 AM PST by my4kidsdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

They'd have a stroke if they saw the "Sportsman's Messenger," which regularly features kids holding the guns they used to win shooting competitions.


48 posted on 02/23/2006 9:30:46 AM PST by pabianice (contact ebay??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul

I don't see how that could be a criminal violation assuming he wasn't threatening anyone.


52 posted on 02/23/2006 10:09:10 AM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LouAvul
I'm going to be a grandfather in July.

Grandkid is getting a gun on that birthday and every one after that, as long as I'm alive.

54 posted on 02/23/2006 11:02:46 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson