Skip to comments.The Boston Globe: Pimping for 'gays'
Posted on 02/26/2006 12:58:24 PM PST by wagglebee
An open letter to Helen Donovan, editor of the Globe on its article "Gay principals soon take helm at both Newton high schools."
Under your supervision or that of another of the homosexuality marketeers now running the Globe we got this latest little goodie:
"Jennifer Price, 34, is a doctoral student at Harvard's Graduate School of Education who lives in Newton with her spouse and their two young children. She takes over at Newton North High School in July."
Now, Helen, you're not intentionally avoiding a franker use of English just so the precipitously declining readership of this once great newspaper won't be confronted with the sheer absurdity of this propaganda, are you? Why not simply write "her wife"?
The word "spouse" is really only used when one does not know or is not willing to reveal the gender, or when referring to a mixed-gender group. That is not the case here, Helen, so what are you hiding? Get on with the revolution, girl! Good little Globe journalists have a job to do and that is to push the deconstruction of Western Civilization forward at whatever monstrous expense to helpless children.
That imperative is precisely why the Globe has never run an honest article on the far greater prevalence of molestation of children by homosexuals including lesbians or an honest article on the statistical near non-existence of "stable" male homosexual relationships, especially of the monogamous kind. "Salzer and his partner of 11 years, Carlos Schillaci ..." Yeah? Well, have we not learned yet how many homosexual activists are faking these 9-year, 11-year and 16-year relationships when asked? "Eleven years" sure sounds a whole lot better than the truth and it also serves that central purpose of dispelling obsolete moral and pragmatic considerations about homosexuality.
In today's Orwellian Globe, where glamorizing the Golden Age of Sodomy is job one, no quote from a homosexual is ever treated with professional objectivity. Yet, anything spoken by a politically incorrect "homophobe" is treated with contempt or suspicion. That's not journalism, Helen, is it?
Any academic who has tried to study male homosexual "couples" or has even read studies on them knows very well that the numbers of them that survive five years as a "couple" are so minute that they cannot be combined into statistically useful groups for demographic and sociological research. You've been conned. Right? No, actually, you haven't. You've had this very conversation with your fellow lesbians a thousand times about the embarrassing sexual incontinence of most male homosexuals, right?
So, let's place a public bet. Check up on your subjects Brian Salzer and "his partner of 11 years," Carlos Schillaci, in two more years. Come on. I'll bet you your career the charade will be over. There will be some other pretty face to call "spouse."
And dare I ask how long we have to keep playing along, pretending that honest-to-goodness monogamy is part of the stable gay-couple scam? Homosexuality has a known pedigree over 3,000 years old. The Globe's faux-naive political bedtime storytelling routinely contradicts everything that homosexuals and heterosexuals have ever learned about homosexuality. Not all of us confine our reading to the pages of Boston's second-best gay newspaper. (Yes, you're No 2. Bay Windows is actually often more honest and objective than you guys at the Globe are. Their bias is out of the closet.)
And domestic abuse by lesbians is legendary among lesbians and amply documented. But not in your Boston Globe. That would be journalism. If "fundamentalist" Protestants or conservative Catholics had that kind of baggage, you'd be milking that day and night. Are we on the same page, Helen? Nor has the Globe ever treated its last few, gullible readers to an honest exploration of the arguments and evidence that would compel responsible persons not to subject any child to a pseudo-family in which they are intentionally deprived of either motherhood or fatherhood. Wow!
Incredible, is it not, that literate, "educated" people with no thought, no discussion, no reference to research on child psychology going back generations, at least to Freud would blithely dismiss the self-evident desire and need of every human child to love and be loved by his mother and his father. What kind of people treat human children as laboratory rats and claim moral superiority for so doing?
Oh, I know your Globe won't publish word one of this letter. This is not your grandfather's Boston Globe. Soviet-like silencing of dissent is fundamental to spreading false enlightenment and sustaining any revolution. Your lock-step journalists are just doing their jobs. If they did real journalism on homosexuality they'd be fired. They know that. Hey, you don't hire and promote folks with conventional values and morals at the Globe no more than the New York Times or the Newton Public Schools would.
Yeah, it just happens by accident that both of the "best qualified" applicants for Newton's principal's jobs are homosexuals, though that demographic category represents between 1.5 and 5 percent of the population, depending on whom you ask. The relentless march of "meritocracy." Just coincidentally, people with real backbone and professional ethics fail your "merit" test. So you have to hire militant homosexuals. Let the games begin, and may the best homosexual win.
And did you just forget to alert readers that Newton pupils have endured a Soviet-style life-size mural of teenage lesbians holding hands and a book called "Romea and Juliet"? And that they were assigned a book with man-boy and boy-dog sex? Oh, and anal sex between boys, male and female masturbation with a hot dog? (Here's a reminder, Helen.) Of course you forgot. You guys sure know how to run a revolution.
Yeah, yeah, I know. There is no "You Guys." Once again, it's just pure chance that most of the senior "editors" at the Globe and also on the varsity team down at the New York Times are homosexual activists. And they put out "newspapers" that are no less objective about their favorite topics than Osama bin Laden is about his. Just honest, fair-minded professionals. Good work, Helen. There's a new kind of Jim Crow apartheid bigotry in America today, and you're part of it.
This just nails it!
Defeat from within
Defeat? DEFEAT? Says WHO? You've declared defeat? You've decreed that the Good Fight is over, a loss, and all soldiers need immediately abandon their assignments, throw down their arms and throw up their hands?
You have decided that the enemy of everything good, the slanderer, the liar, the murderer, is the new King? You're abandoning the mission to save children from being led into miserable lives of bondage to sin and error? You're relinquishing all ground won to a thief?
That call is not yours to make. Go get some rest, soldier. Maybe you will see action again someday. For the rest of us, there is no option but Victory.
Defeat, my *ss. Only when those who are supposed to win, quit, is there defeat.
How can there possibly be any parents left who would let their children attend these schools?
Whoa there Dobbin!
I didn't say they've won the war. But they've sure as Hell captured some of our institutions. Universities and the Press at the top of the "loss" column.
Doesn't mean they're lost forever. As this forum itself proves, we just have to re-calibrate our tactics.
I'm not giving up FRiend. Trust me.
gimme 50. ;)
Note the "48" in the handle.
I'll give you 10 today and an IOU for the balance. I CAN do 10! I really really can!
Is that how it works?
They definitely have an agenda, but in 10-15 years MSM as we know it will have ceased to exist.
I guess Helen, the editor of the Boston Globe, wants to have her cake and Edith, too ;)
IN THAT QUESTION.... lies the answer to this whole "sodomite principals" affair.
You don't know much about Newton, Massachusetts.
I hope you're right.
I read an article by Peggy Noonan last year that had a lot of truth to it.
She said that as the blogs and the Internet have exposed the MSM for what they really are (a propaganda arm for liberalism, immorality, and radical secularism), both the left and the right have become more strident. As the right has exposed the left, the left has responded with anger and has in turn become more radical. Perhaps the left has just become more honest and transparent as to what it really stands for.
To be heard above the din, the MSM has become more militant in its rhetoric. A reasonable and rational person would hope that as its bias is exposed, the MSM would alter its approach and try to become more objective.
In fact, the opposite has occurred.
This question is for parents who routinely return the likes of Kennedy, Kerry, Meehan, and Fwank to elected office?
Perhaps what we have is a growing indication of how entrenched voting fraud is in Mass.
If voting really mattered would the democrat party support voting by citizens?
actually the ABA is pushing the forbiding of the words husband and wife. They want to "neuter" the marital status to sex partners.
It is in the Model Domestic Relations law. It is comming to a divorce law update from a state legislature near you.
Your point is well-taken.
You don't know much about Newton, Massachusetts.
You are right.
See Wide Glide's answer to me in #16.