Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; Do not dub me shapka broham; Convert from ECUSA; Alouette; SJackson; Hannah Senesh

Interesting stuff.


"Eleven members of the Israeli delegation to the Munich Olympics were murdered by people belonging to the Black September organization, or killed in a failed rescue attempt, on September 5, 1972. The Israeli reaction has already fueled scores of articles, books and recently Steven Spielberg's film "Munich" as well. One angle of the story remains vague: the politics and diplomacy in the wake of the terror attack.

Now the missing information has been supplied, thanks to the declassification last summer of secret documents from U.S. President Richard Nixon's administration. Some verbatim excerpts from these documents provide a rare lesson in personal and international relations, with the help of an American team then headed by President Nixon, Secretary of State William Rogers, his rival - and ultimately successor - National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, and Kissinger's deputy, General Alexander Haig.

No Hollywood producer would hire a screenwriter who dared imagine dialogue of the sort that was recorded for posterity at the White House, between the fear-ridden and crude-talking Nixon, and the obsequious and manipulative Kissinger, using the same recording system that toppled Nixon two years later. Two-and-a-half months after the burglary of the Democratic headquarters in the Watergate building, two months before the elections, Nixon had a large lead over Democratic candidate George McGovern, but Nixon was not certain of his victory. The day after the Munich event, what worried him most were the possible reactions: a war of vengeance started by Israel and Jewish voters being pushed into the arms of their traditional patron, the Democratic Party.

The president's most important Jewish supporter in Washington was Israeli Ambassador Yitzhak Rabin. "


2 posted on 02/26/2006 10:51:34 PM PST by dervish ("And what are we becoming? The civilization of melted butter?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dervish

Interesting, thanks for posting.


4 posted on 02/26/2006 11:31:50 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
Who "trusts" Henry Kissinger?

Man, he knew how to lay it on thick, didn't he?

5 posted on 02/26/2006 11:33:04 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

"The day after the Munich event, what worried him most were the possible reactions: a war of vengeance started by Israel and Jewish voters being pushed into the arms of their traditional patron, the Democratic Party."

Well - from these transcriptions at least - nothing jumped out at me about Nixon fearing that Jewish voters would leave the party. Obviously he was interested in the general looks of "politicing" though. (I liked the part about going to church for 5 minutes!)


6 posted on 02/27/2006 12:03:13 AM PST by geopyg (Ever Vigilant, Never Fearful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

bttt


8 posted on 02/27/2006 12:08:37 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

Real simple: The one person you can depend on is yourself. Israel knows that, and the US knows it, too. The US also knows if they don't do something in the event of Iran's nukes, Israel certainly will.


12 posted on 02/27/2006 3:18:02 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
Thanks for the post.

"fear-ridden and crude-talking Nixon"

Respectfully, I have to agree with geopyg that I see nothing in any of this that suggests Nixon was "fear-ridden". As far as the "Crude-talking Nixon" is concerned, I think you'd find that in any conversations with a U.S. president, the only one in the room who ever uses Glengarry Glen Ross lingo is the president. This sort of 'jock talk' is almost a requirement of the president's job [certainly in the case of Truman, JFK and most especially LBJ], partly to show that the P is in charge [no one else in such presidential exchanges ever uses such language of course, in deference to P's office], but partly also, I think, presidents use such language in order to make those around the P feel they can can speak as freely as they want -- although rarely do any of the staff people ever resort to the sort of language they likely use when conversing with their own personal staffs in the P's absence. In my opinion, Kissinger isn't making policy. Nixon is just letting him speak, as a Jew, for what Kissinger believes is the best course of action, and Nixon, in basic agreement with K anyway, is doing his best to seem accommodating.

23 posted on 02/27/2006 9:29:53 PM PST by I. M. Trenchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson