Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tri-cycles for grownups? Maybe
Business Week ^ | 27 February 2006 | Mira Serrill-Robins

Posted on 02/26/2006 10:49:16 PM PST by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: Blue Jays
"Several of your points make perfect sense...and don't be lulled into believing one of these tiny trikes will be much "safer" than a motorcycle. Any accident suffered in them would be traumatic and ugly. They're only as wide as your shoulders and hips, which is why rugged protective gear would make so much sense."

Sorry---disagree. The "exoskeleton" design of the framing lends itself perfectly to a great "roll cage". Would work just like the safety cages on dragsters.

"A VW Golf TDI with the 1.9 liter diesel engine gets mileage that hovers around 42-45 miles to the gallon."

I'd guesstimate that a gas-powered buggy like this with all the computerized tricks would probably get twice that. It would certainly get better gas mileage than an equivalent motorcycle (I'm talking a "closed version") due to reduced aerodynamic drag.

61 posted on 02/27/2006 8:45:17 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Hi WW-

That "dragracer exoskeleton" is designed to slide down a racetrack in the event of a mishap involving no other vehicles...not to get slammed by a dumptruck hauling a load of sand to a landscaping job. Heck, we're talking about a vehicle that has a passenger compartment that is probably 30" wide and lower than many truck bumpers. These trikes will only be incrementally more secure than a motorcycle in a collision. If you're concerned about your safety on a bike as you mentioned earlier, please don't look to this type of vehicle as a solution.

These trikes will get decent mileage, no doubt, but I don't think it will be nearly as radical as the "doubling" you're expecting to see. In order to double the VW TDI diesels or even some of the wonderful Toyota Corolla models, we're talking nearly 100 miles per gallon of fuel. That kind of economical mileage isn't just around the corner.

~ Blue Jays ~

62 posted on 02/27/2006 9:26:05 AM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; All

The problem is that these three wheelers are lists as motorcycles. There is no "commuter vehicle" class.


63 posted on 02/27/2006 10:00:40 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Check out Buckminster Fuller's Dymaxion car: http://www.washedashore.com/projects/dymax/images/car3.jpg


64 posted on 02/27/2006 10:45:41 AM PST by TexasRepublic (North American distributor for Mohammed Urinals. Franchises available.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
"That "dragracer exoskeleton" is designed to slide down a racetrack in the event of a mishap involving no other vehicles...not to get slammed by a dumptruck hauling a load of sand to a landscaping job. Heck, we're talking about a vehicle that has a passenger compartment that is probably 30" wide and lower than many truck bumpers. These trikes will only be incrementally more secure than a motorcycle in a collision."

And how many motorcycle drivers get "slammed by a dumptruck hauling a load"---not many. The majority get the ax by separating from the bike and trying to emulate a bird.--which is exactly what a roll-cage and safety harnesses are all about preventing.

"These trikes will get decent mileage, no doubt, but I don't think it will be nearly as radical as the "doubling" you're expecting to see. In order to double the VW TDI diesels or even some of the wonderful Toyota Corolla models, we're talking nearly 100 miles per gallon of fuel. That kind of economical mileage isn't just around the corner."

Disagree. I think 100 mpg with a really aerodynamic exoskeletal safety frame and an engine fully electronically controlled is quite do-able.

65 posted on 02/27/2006 12:46:42 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Hi Wonder Warthog-

The accident scenario was designed to paint a picture. In simple terms, these trikes (whether exoskeleton or not) are far from the safety of an automobile or truck since they're positioned practically right on the ground.

They have greatly decreased capability in challenging weather and limited comfort with regard to A/C, heating, and ventiliation.

Mileage remains to be seen, but the Corbin models gets around 35 m.p.g. with the open model with the closed version still in pre-production status. Even then, they're only predicting 80 m.p.g. once everything is said and done. As mentioned earlier in the thread, my friend's father was consistently getting 49 m.p.g. more than a decade ago and could carry a few people and a load of groceries simultaneously. Why not put some eggs in that basket? Diesel hasn't been explored enough in this country. Simple engines with less moving parts.

The trikes look like they would be loads of fun to drive, but to say they're as safe and as comfortable as a modern car or truck is an enormous stretch. Can we at least agree on that?

~ Blue Jays ~

66 posted on 02/27/2006 1:09:19 PM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
"The accident scenario was designed to paint a picture."

Yes, but neither of your "superior alternatives" (Volkswagen Golf/Toyota Corolla) would survive that particular scenario any better.

"They have greatly decreased capability in challenging weather and limited comfort with regard to A/C, heating, and ventiliation."

I disagree. This is "just engineering". None of these problems can't be overcome with proper design.

"Even then, they're only predicting 80 m.p.g. once everything is said and done. As mentioned earlier in the thread, my friend's father was consistently getting 49 m.p.g."

MOST compact cars get no more than 40 mpg "highway mileage". Eighty mpg is damned close to twice 49 mpg. And that is without the incremental advances that will ABSOLUTELY happen once the basic model is released.

"Diesel hasn't been explored enough in this country. Simple engines with less moving parts."

I absolutely agree---but what is to stop Diesel cycle engines being developed for these conveyances?? There is no lower limit in size for Diesel engines. Heck--the Russians built Diesel MODEL AIRPLANE ENGINES.

"but to say they're as safe and as comfortable as a modern car or truck is an enormous stretch."

But they WILL be far safer and more comfortable than any motorcycle. And with proper design, CAN be safer from MOST types of accidents than today's cars. None of them yet come with a "roll cage" frame.

67 posted on 02/28/2006 4:52:41 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Cross a motorcycle with a small car, and you get a new kind of hybrid....

A Dodge Tomahawk?


68 posted on 02/28/2006 11:12:58 AM PST by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I'll stick with two and four wheels.

I did see a groovy trike with a Turbocharged Corvair engine, that kinda tickled my fancy. :):)


69 posted on 02/28/2006 1:29:06 PM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: archy

Love that too fast bike!!!!!! Someone made one out of a Boss Hoss Motorcycle and a Dodge Viper motor. I would love to put 2 wheels on the back of one of those, because I can't reach the ground on the left side anymore.


70 posted on 03/02/2006 4:02:17 PM PST by MrStumpy (Its awful embarrassing to get your butt kicked by a one legged man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1

That'll get your butt kicked almost anywhere...


71 posted on 03/02/2006 4:04:15 PM PST by steveo (There is absolutely nothing like the MAIN-frame of a dame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: steveo

LOL!!

As a final strategy, you could use it as a war hammer and beat the thilly thavegas with it! :-)


ARRGgghhh!!AARGGGRRR :-)


72 posted on 03/02/2006 4:33:13 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
i thought they were taking about VW kit trikes..

73 posted on 03/23/2006 1:44:05 PM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1

I saw one of those little things up in the Bay Area (Figures!) last week. It was going down the 101 about 15 seconds behind a Hummer H2. I remember thinking that the order the two vehicles had going down the road was probably a good thing.


74 posted on 03/23/2006 1:50:32 PM PST by Redcloak (WARNING: This post may be a violation of Federal law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal

Note having 2 wheels in front and one in back is much more stable, since most of the time you are moving forward, not backwards.


75 posted on 12/21/2006 6:27:59 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
From my perspective I see minimal increases in safety, virtually no increase in cargo capacity, absolutely increased operating expense, and who is going to qualified to work on these things?

What you do get is a vehicle you can commute in in any weather, in a suit if need be, and arrive comfortable, dry, and unruffled. Depending on the model, fuel economy could be through the roof, and performance still better than that of an economy car.

76 posted on 12/21/2006 6:32:04 AM PST by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Note having 2 wheels in front and one in back is much more stable, since most of the time you are moving forward, not backwards.

The Reliant Robin (British, 70's) had 2 in back and one in front, and was reputed to have stability problems. On first viewing one the immediate question that came to mind was why bother building something like this???? >

Anyway, sooner or later every discarded concept will be resurrected......
77 posted on 12/21/2006 6:57:41 AM PST by MelonFarmerJ (Proudly voting Republican/conservative in every election since 1964)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Yeah well so were man-purses

I wear mine proudly!

SURVIVAL MAN PURSE

78 posted on 06/18/2007 1:48:37 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson