Threat of Teachers Unions

Neal Boortz made a bold statement on his show the other day. He said “the teachers unions are a greater long-term threat to freedom and prosperity than Islamic terrorists”. I’m guessing he came under some fire for that one, because the very next day, he was talking about it again. He said he’d given it a lot of thought, really examined the implications of his statement, and stood behind what he said.

Now, that’s a pretty strong statement, and one that I agree with. Before you all think I’m crazy, I point out the words “long-term”. In the short term, conflict with Islamic terrorists is a direct threat to our freedom and prosperity, and one that needs to be taken very seriously. On the bright side, however, it is one that we’re taking very seriously. We understand the stakes in the conflict, and we are determined to defeat the terrorists. Furthermore, as the Islamic world begins to liberalize and democratize, the threat will diminish significantly on its own.

But the threat of the teachers unions is considerably different. Only a minority of people consider them to be a threat in the first place. Most people in this country think that the unions have education of students as their primary goal, when it is obvious to anybody paying attention that they act in the interest of teachers, often to the detriment of students.

They fight any implementation of standards or testing, because they wish to resist accountability. They fight every program that will increase educational choice for families, because it will lead to a reduction of their bargaining power. They wish education to be handled at the government level, because the government is much easier to lobby and fight than a distributed network of privately-managed schools.

They push endlessly for two specific goals, higher funding and lower class sizes. Higher funding will directly increase teacher salaries. Lower class sizes create a need for higher and higher numbers of teachers, essentially forcing shortages. Hence: higher teacher salaries. It keeps going. They push for a requirement of a “teaching credential” before they push for a requirement that teachers are experts in their subjects. They want to make sure that bright, knowledgeable folks with teaching talent are not allowed to teach unless they have a teaching “credential”. What does all this amount to? Like any cartel, they seek one thing above all: to remove competition. Lower class sizes and credentialing requirements ensure that existing teachers have a strong bargaining position when the union fights for more benefits.

But the biggest problem eclipses all of the above. Their threat to our freedom is not that of newsworthy attacks on human life, but the incremental destruction of human individualism. Boortz explains it much better than I do, when he points out the fact that the government is the actor in our world that we give a monopoly on the power to initiate force. That is an awesome power, and its application must be feared and curtailed whenever possible. But the people we ask to teach our children feed at the trough of government! You will never teach children to fear the application of government power by sending them to government schools. When the teachers unions are helped by a greater concentration of power– as that gives their lobbying much more effect– they will by design support greater government power. And where government power increases, human individualism recedes.

The teachers unions benefit greatly from a public that believes in the idea of collective action, be it union action, government welfare, or simply the “world community”. They benefit greatly from the idea that kids fit into cookie-cutter molds, and if one dares to exhibit individuality, they should be immediately muted with high doses of ritalin. The teachers who benefit from power in government, from keeping children from growing up to question teachers unions, and who prefer the orderly medicated classroom to one that they must keep orderly by inspiring and motivating students, are doing damage to the very fabric of this country. They are creating a nation of citizens who don’t question authority and who don’t have a love of truth and learning. Even worse, they’re creating a nation of citizens without the tools (i.e. logic) to understand the very forces pulling on the levers of their psyche. A nation filled with that sort of citizen is doomed to rot from within.

What will happen if the current situation is continued to exist? What will happen if teachers unions, who have the public on their side (after all, everyone loves and reveres teachers!) continue to stifle competition and standards? Well, I would argue that we’re already seeing the effect, in the inability of schools in much of the country to turn out graduates with a meaningful diploma. I’ve said before that I moved to Georgia partially for the schools, but that is because I moved to an area of Georgia populated by concerned parents who demand accountability from the local schools. Where I moved is somewhere that I might not be ashamed to send my future children to public schools. But my community is an exception in this state, where the schools lag behind the rest of the dullard states in this nation. The situation is bad here and across the country, and it is getting worse.

The teachers unions are not in the slightest bit interested in fixing the problem, except to the extent that it keeps their necks off the chopping block another year. Much like politicians, the status quo is more than suitable for them as long as they don’t awaken the sleeping giant that is the American public. To beat them, we will need to shine a light not only on the results of their actions– the absolutely atrocious education that children in our schools are receiving– but on the fact that the teachers unions are the root cause behind those results. Unions in this country have long received unjustly favorable media treatment, and everyone loves to be on the side of teachers. But unless we can point out the specific ways that teachers unions are harming our children, we won’t stand a chance of beating them.

I’ll be frank. Terrorists setting off a nuclear device in a major American city are a more pressing concern for me over the next 10 years than the actions of teachers unions. But assuming that we can avoid that nightmare scenario, I worry greatly about the world my children will grow up in if we can’t find a way to fix the problem those unions have caused.

Do you suppose that the quality of our educational system has anything to do with the fact that the undergraduate students in Education scored the lowest of all majors on the SAT and ACT; and that Education graduates scored the lowest of all majors on the GRE? If we want a superior educational system, educating our children should attract the best and the brightest that our nation has to offer. Instead it attracts and keeps the dullards with degrees. Teachers unions reinforce the situation.

As a retired teacher and former NEA member my opinion is the same as the writer. The teachers Union is a great threat to our Republic. I was told by a union representative that Republicans should not be teachers. She and the union are impleminting this program as we read. "One party, one reich, one union," this is what the National Socialist wanted for Germany.

I had a friend with whom I disagreed on nearly everything. We both agreed that the GRE exam was worthless. I thought it was worthless because I got 98 percentile and Bs in grad school. He thought that it was worthless because he got 40 percentile and got As in grad school.

I asked him, "Did you go to Graduate School for Business, or Education?"

My MS was in Engineering.

My MSs are in Engineering and Economics.

I've helped my wife through both her MS in Education and her Specialist in Education Administration (half way to a PhD without a dissertation). She's a Department Chair in a public (government) High School. In the process of helping her, I got to review the "model school projects," etc. that were put together by a team of Eductation graduate students. I was embarassed for her to be putting her name on them along with the team of future administrators. Frankly they wouldn't have gotten a C in undergraduate English and even less in undergraduate business or economics where I went to school, but they got A+ in Education.

If we want a superior educational system, educating our children should attract the best and the brightest that our nation has to offer. Instead it attracts and keeps the dullards with degrees.

Find that out and tell me why the "best and the brightest" would go into this profession.

In addition, I disagree with Boortz on this one...if a parent is unhappy with the way a school is teaching, then they should go to their school board, who sets the educational curiculum, class size, teacher hires, etc. This is truly an issue that can be changed at the local level. Problem is, many parents would rather biatch than get involved.

My wife is a teacher and the union will lead them into total failure. I've personally seen teachers who sere spending so much time trying to do the job of Principal that she was almost never in her classroom. Every time even the smallest decision was made she was absolutely positive that she had to be the center of the loop.
The teachers union is the definition of a political organization. They have a position on everything even though 85% of their positions have nothing to do with the schools.
Politics has no place in the classroom. Any discussion of union subjects between union members should be forced off of school grounds and paid school time.

Do you know what the avg STARTING salary is for a public school teacher? Not the average salary, which is horibly inflated by the ridiculous salaries of those teachers who are past their "jump step" level of 15-18 yrs, but the starting salary.

$27,640 to $42,204, depending on degree and experience. It goes up to $39,422 to $61,641 with 20 years of experience. And Georgia has the highest teacher salaries in the Southeast.

I once spoke before the school board and told them flat out that the reason they couldn't get or retain good teachers was the private industry would hire the best and the brightest away by doubling their salary. Their answer was that they were limited on what they could pay by the state and local politicians. School boards can only hire the best and the brightest of the applicants, and if the salaries and working conditions limit the applicants, they have little choice but to fill the classrooms with what they can get.

Politicians on the other hand are responsive to the voters and if the uneducated masses of voters believe that teachers are overpaid and that education isn't important (Georgia and the Southeast!!!) then they aren't going to fund it!

What risk do we face by allowing competition--only the risk that the teachers unions won't contribute to the election campaigns and the union myrmidons won't vote for them.

Most people in this country think that the unions have education of students as their primary goal, when it is obvious to anybody paying attention that they act in the interest of teachers, often to the detriment of students.

The teachers say the union only cares about the union. The teachers are commodities in the deal the same way the students are.

More students means more state and federal money. More teachers means more dues to the union.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.