Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A new twist for Pennsylvania's Senate race?
msnbc ^ | 7 March 2006 | Tom Curry

Posted on 03/06/2006 7:17:14 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

WASHINGTON — Abortion rights leader Kate Michelman is thinking of jumping into the Senate race in Pennsylvania as an independent.

Michelman is appalled by Democratic Party leaders’ selection of anti-abortion candidate Bob Casey Jr. as their choice to try to unseat two-term Republican Sen. Rick Santorum.

For Michelman and other supporters of the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision, the final straw came in late January when Casey endorsed President Bush’s Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito.

Analyst and pollster Terry Madonna at Franklin & Marshall College in Pennsylvania said, “If she runs as an independent, they’ve given Santorum a significant boost.” He added, “This is a very interesting dilemma liberal Democrats have right now.”

Michelman said that if she joined the Senate race, she’d do so as an independent since she couldn’t meet Tuesday’s filing deadline to compete in the May 16 Democratic primary.

To run as an independent Michelman would need to get the signatures of 67,000 registered voters by Aug. 1.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2006; abortion; babykiller; bobcasey; deadbabies; michelman; ohpleaseohplease; runkaterun; runskankrun; santorum; senate; thirdparty
I just LOVE watching the Dems at war with themselves!
1 posted on 03/06/2006 7:17:20 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"To run as an independent Michelman would need to get the signatures of 67,000 registered voters by Aug. 1."

Finally, a "poll" worth FReeping.

Sign up, Keystoners!
2 posted on 03/06/2006 7:20:00 PM PST by decal (Whoever said you can't fool all the people all the time has never visited DU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Run, Kate, run!!


3 posted on 03/06/2006 7:21:08 PM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

run skank run!


4 posted on 03/06/2006 7:21:18 PM PST by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I covered a lot of this territory a year ago in The Splintering of the Democratic Party.

But I would argue that she would be better off tying up with the Green Party, an organization with an existing infrastructure that could simplify her money-raising issues and give her a ready-made base.

5 posted on 03/06/2006 7:23:35 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

This is probably one of the few ways Santorum could eek out a win.

As of right now I don't have high hopes for Santorum's reelection.


6 posted on 03/06/2006 7:24:28 PM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24
run skank run!

Well said.

7 posted on 03/06/2006 7:28:49 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Hate means never having to say you're crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: decal
"To run as an independent Michelman would need to get the signatures of 67,000 registered voters by Aug. 1."

Where do I sign?

8 posted on 03/06/2006 7:30:59 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

She's not going to get 67,000 signatures without some serious $$$ from somebody. Pennsylvania is a difficult state in which to get on the ballot.


9 posted on 03/06/2006 7:31:06 PM PST by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Santorum will win regardless of his opponent.
10 posted on 03/06/2006 7:33:28 PM PST by Barnyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Barnyard

Why?

He has been down consistently 15-20 points in the polls.

There has been nothing to suggest to me that Santorum will win this race thus far.

His big wedge issue was abortion and Casey took it away from him.


11 posted on 03/06/2006 7:36:40 PM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I think that if Michelman ran, it would marginally help Santorum. But I suspect that she is mouthing hot air. The Democrat powers have anointed Casey, and he is leading in all preelection polls now.


12 posted on 03/06/2006 7:37:09 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

"Run, Kate, run!!"

I second that. So, she's a pennsy resident, I take it?


13 posted on 03/06/2006 7:40:29 PM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Allentown Morning Call/Muhlenberg College poll

Junior leading by 12 points in the latest poll. It is quite conceivable that Santorum could come back and win.

14 posted on 03/06/2006 7:48:01 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Believe me, I hope Santorum finds a way to pull it off.

But when I look at the electoral picture for 2006, I assume a Santorum loss.


15 posted on 03/06/2006 7:53:13 PM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

You go girl! I fully endorse Kate Michelperson to run as an independent candidate. I believe all pro-abortionists should have a candidate they can vote for in this race!


16 posted on 03/06/2006 8:04:16 PM PST by conservative_2001 (Defeat Paul Hackett and Jean Schmidt in 2006 - one down, one to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Michelman is talking about "jumping into the race" as a way to help Casey get publicity and make him look downright reasonable and "moderate", etc. - - ie., safe for regular folks to vote for. I'm sure the DNC (or maybe even the Casey campaign) is behind all this Michelman press.

If Casey gets elected, the Democrats will let him go his own way on any slam-dunk abortion-related votes, but in the end he'll do whatever the party leadership tells him to do on the close stuff where his vote is truly needed. Especially judicial nominations.

Michelman knows this and is only there to help.


17 posted on 03/06/2006 8:13:10 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

thx for posting. when i first saw the article i was just disgusted but after seeing the post i realized that there is an opportunity here and have since activated my local town hall meetup to help organize for her petition drive. thx


18 posted on 03/06/2006 8:25:34 PM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Yes, that's the way I see it, too.

Casey's father was pro-life, but it's by no means certain that Casey is. He has not really committed himself. By mouthing off like this, Michelman is only making Casey look good to voters who may doubt his pro-life credentials.


19 posted on 03/06/2006 8:34:22 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
By mouthing off like this, Michelman is only making Casey look good to voters who may doubt his pro-life credentials.

Yep. That's what the game is all about.

20 posted on 03/06/2006 8:35:44 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Dems want to bag Santorum bad. Pennsylvania doesn't have a lot of true independent voters. It is a very old fashioned state, the closest we have left to the 1950's in some ways. Michaelman will pull very few votes.


21 posted on 03/06/2006 8:38:10 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Abortion rights leader Kate Michelman is thinking of jumping into the Senate race in Pennsylvania as an independent.

AWWWWWWW

22 posted on 03/06/2006 8:43:57 PM PST by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

"Pennsylvania is Philadelphia on one side, Pittsburgh on the other side, and Alabama in between."
- James Carville


23 posted on 03/06/2006 8:49:23 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Run, Kate, Run!!


24 posted on 03/06/2006 8:49:57 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
It seems that fewer and fewer people are willing to stand up for infanticide all the time. I guess the word is getting out...there's just no moral, ethical or healthy reason for it.

Abortion is not about saving women’s lives!

Studies Find Abortions Have Long-Term Adverse Effects

Total Abortions since 1973

45,951,133

------------------------------------------------------------

Why the drop after 1960? (in deaths of women from illegal abortions)

The reasons were new and better antibiotics, better surgery and the establishment of intensive care units in hospitals. This was in the face of a rising population. Between 1967 and 1970 sixteen states legalized abortion. In most it was limited, only for rape, incest and severe fetal handicap (life of mother was legal in all states). There were two big exceptions — California in 1967, and New York in 1970 allowed abortion on demand. Now look at the chart carefully.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Abortion Statistics - Decision to Have an Abortion (U.S.)

· 25.5% of women deciding to have an abortion want to postpone childbearing

· 21.3% of women cannot afford a baby

· 14.1% of women have a relationship issue or their partner does not want a child

· 12.2% of women are too young (their parents or others object to the pregnancy)

· 10.8% of women feel a child will disrupt their education or career

· 7.9% of women want no (more) children

· 3.3% of women have an abortion due to a risk to fetal health

2.8% of women have an abortion due to a risk to maternal health

----------------------------------------------------------------------

So how many women’s lives have been saved by abortion?

Only about 3% of abortions since 1972 were reported to be “due to a risk to maternal health.” A reasonable person would recognize that not all of those cases represent a lethal risk. But let’s say they did. That means that nearly 45 million fetuses were butchered to save the lives of about 1.3 million women. Or put another way; 35 babies are killed to save each woman.

Abortion was legal in all 50 states prior to Roe v. Wade in cases of danger to the life of the woman.

Roe v Wade: FULL Text (The Decision that wiped out an entire Generation 33 years ago today)

25 posted on 03/06/2006 8:55:58 PM PST by TigersEye (Are your parents Pro-Choice? I guess you got lucky! ... Is your spouse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

That IS a good one isn't it?


26 posted on 03/06/2006 9:05:38 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Torie
In 1998, some PA conservatives were dismayed that no "real conservative" is running for Governor. Peg Luksik ran on the Constitutional Party ticket. She received 10% of the vote. Tom Ridge was re-elected that year with 57% of the vote.

I suspect that the RATS will attempt to abort Michelman's candidacy by shopping for a judge to invalidate the signatures. By aborting Michaelman, Hillary Clinton could say that this is proof that people of faith are welcome in the RAT party.

I think Michaelman is sincere in her hatred of Junior Casey. To her, anyone who even supports mild restrictions on abortion is the enemy. She is still angry about her 1st husband dumping her when she was pregnant 35+ years ago.
27 posted on 03/06/2006 9:06:09 PM PST by Kuksool (A Culture of RAT Corruption caused the Katrina Mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Yes, and in another year, she might get traction, but not this year. The Dems are de-emphasizing abortion across the board, and gun control is dead. The Dems have found more promising traps to lay, the biggie being Iraq.


28 posted on 03/06/2006 9:08:51 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Oh Yeah!!!


29 posted on 03/06/2006 9:09:31 PM PST by Once-Ler (The rat 06 election platform will be a promise to impeach the President if they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

LOL !!!


30 posted on 03/06/2006 9:11:31 PM PST by no dems ("A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking" Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Personally, I hope she DOESN'T run. She would certainly pull enough Dem votes from Casey to give Santorum the victory but, I'm still pissed at him for working as hard as he could to give us six more years of Arlen Specter.

I think Casey would probably be just as conservative as Little Ricky. I know we want all the Pubbies to win that can because we want to maintain a majority for Committee Chairmanships etc., but I'm just sick and tired of political whores regardless of their party affilitation.


31 posted on 03/06/2006 9:17:56 PM PST by no dems ("A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking" Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Apart from abortion, how is Casey conservative? Was his father a "conservative" of a typisch Irish-Catholic Democrat? I fear that he is about as conservative as the Irish Catholic bishops, which means slightly to the right of social democracy. Look at the manifesto of the 55 "Catholic" Democratic house members.


32 posted on 03/06/2006 9:33:33 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Torie
***The Dems are de-emphasizing abortion across the board, and gun control is dead***

That is true in Red States and Purple States. But the RATS haven't changed their tune at all in Blue States. For example in IL, my RAT Governor, Blago, wants to chase gun manufacturers out of the state to keep kids safe from street gangs. He called the GOP Governor primary, "A beauty contest for the NRA". Also, he is touting how we're one Supreme Justice away from back alley abortions. He pledges to not to turn IL into SD.

In CA, I suspect the 2 Marxists vying to take a poke at Arnold are accusing the Governor of being a "Right Wing Barbarian". Arnold vetoed a pro-gay marriage bill and campaigned for parent notification for abortion in the special election. Also he raised money for McClintock. The RAT nominee will no doubt attempt to link him with the Religious Right as a method to motivate the Bay Area and Hollywood against Arnold.
33 posted on 03/06/2006 9:34:23 PM PST by Kuksool (A Culture of RAT Corruption caused the Katrina Mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Junior Casey is pro-life on abortion and stem cell research. but liberal on everything else. He says universal health care and raising the minimum wage will reduce abortions.
34 posted on 03/06/2006 9:36:38 PM PST by Kuksool (A Culture of RAT Corruption caused the Katrina Mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

"Apart from abortion, how is Casey conservative?"

I guess we'll have to wait and see; won't we?


35 posted on 03/06/2006 9:39:31 PM PST by no dems ("A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking" Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I just never believed the baby killers would let casey have a pass. Let's find out where to send her some money and help her in any way we can. If she needs voluteers to get her signatures, please you Keystone Freepers go out and help. Make sure the signatures she gets will stand up. Remember the the establishment rat will sneak into this process to try to spoil it.


36 posted on 03/07/2006 5:08:11 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer is the warrior we have been waiting for.We can trust him with our future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
I think Casey would probably be just as conservative as Little Ricky. I know we want all the Pubbies to win that can because we want to maintain a majority for Committee Chairmanships etc., but I'm just sick and tired of political whores regardless of their party affilitation.

Too much Iron City for you.

37 posted on 03/07/2006 5:22:30 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson