Democrat for Senate: Kill practicing 'gays'

World Net Daily ^ | March 7, 2006

[ALWAYSWELDING]

That post was your most embarrassing and uneducated yet. No more replies from me.

[Mr. Brightside]

You are an embarassment to Christianity.

You know there is no Christian church that preaches that we should kill homosexuals.

You know Jesus did not preach it. The apostles did not preach it. Jesus did not practice it. The apostles did not practice it. And for the last 2000 years, the church has not practiced it.

Yet continue to insist that yours is the "Biblical" position.

I expect to see you or Coulter Fan on the news some evening.

Yes, it will be a sad day for the victims. But it will be a good day for those of us who would like to see people like you put away where you can't do much harm.

[neutronsgalore]

"Do the letters "FO" mean anything to you?"

That you're offering Free Oral? Why that's so sweet of you my Brazilian jetliner! But I'll have to decline, I'm married.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

There isn't a consensus? The Biblical consensus is all that matters...just because there is a significant number of people in the general population that celebrate the activity and those that practice as if they're heroes is just evidence of the moral decay in America. Then you ask me how is this going to push back their agenda, first of all, I'd rather advocate what I believe to be right in terms of addressing their transgression, but I view it as the strongest "push" if you want to call it by that.

As to your premise that a majority will not back my position...I concede that...even that a majority of "Christians" wouldn't...one need and only look at the Methodist Church, which now permits ordaining homosexuals even though the Methodist Book of Discipline cites 17 verses and prohibits such a thing. The impassse between us is this - you wish to act through men, not God. You may say that I make those wishing to fight the radical homosexual agenda..."look foolish," but that's because those fighting for such an agenda are able to shame people like you and I'm not going to concern myself with those of little faith & self-doubt. I think they're as foolish as they think I am...how they can celebrate a sexual perversion as something to be proud of....how people are degenerate enough to define themselves by their sin...

How does acknowledging that Abortion is murder...and then observing the reality all around us that it is occuring on a mass scale...then while it has been going on for over three decades...that it is harmful, to use "family values" (I was under the impression that I repeatedly used the put an immediate end to mass murder value)...I don't have sympathy, pity, or compassion for abortionists...do you? How can you one be called pro-life when in 2006, since 1973, they've stood by and grew up with a holocaust? How does one shoot yourself in the foot or become foolish for condemning mass murder to the tune of 45 million or so...answer???

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

I'm not hypocrite....time and again I've raised the issue of the mass murder occuring some 33 years since Roe v. Wade, which had nothing to do with the Constitution, but then you have the nerve after 346 individual posts to start accusing me of blindness to something I've already mentioned repeatedly...you sir are damned liar.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

Yes, I thought so too, LOLOL..

With the NEA "RE-EDUCATION Camps" a.k.a. public schools - with the dismal performance on the subject of history - and with leftists radicals in the universities rewriting America's history into racism, sexism, and imperialism...it isn't surprising that few people are aware of such history...who would have ever thought Vermont and Connecticut, during the founding at least, made Leviticus 18:22, law!

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

I go to World Net Daily...daily if possible!

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

He raised the whole issue of Eric Rudolph...but I'm no pacifist and I never will be in this day and age.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

Wait a minute, I showed you U.S. laws...at the time of the founding that were Leviticus 18:22...verbatim! You mentioned Thomas Jefferson...well, Mr. Jefferson wasn't exactly my favorite, he did advocate castration and drafted law in Virginia to that effect.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

" Or show me a letter to the early church where the Apostle Paul calls on the church to go out and "off" a few homos." "In I Corinthians 6, Paul, exasperated with the Corinthians, some of whom apparently believe themselves to have entered a spiritually exalted state in which the moral rules of their old existence no longer apply to them (cf. I Cor. 4:8, 5:1-2, 8:1-9), confronts them with a blunt rhetorical question: “Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God?” He then gives an illustrative list of the sorts of persons he means: “fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, malakoi, arsenokoitai, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers.”

I have left the terms pertinent to the present issue untranslated, because their translation has been disputed. The word malakoi is not a technical term meaning “homosexuals” (no such term existed either in Greek or in Hebrew), but it appears often in Hellenistic Greek as pejorative slang to describe the “passive” partners—often young boys—in homosexual activity. The word, arsenokoitai., is not found in any extant Greek text earlier than I Corinthians. Some scholars have suggested that its meaning is uncertain, but Robin Scroggs has shown that the word is a translation of the Hebrew mishkav zakur (“lying with the male), derived directly from Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 and used in rabbinic texts to refer to homosexual intercourse. The Septuagint (Greek Old Testament) of Leviticus 20:13 reads, “Whoever lies with a man as with a woman [meta arsenos koiten gynaikos], they have both done an abomination.” This is almost certainly the idiom from which the noun arsenokoitai was coined. Thus, Paul’s use of the term presupposes and reaffirms the holiness code’s condemnation of homosexual acts. This is not a controversial point in Paul’s argument; the letter gives no evidence that anyone at Corinth was arguing for the acceptance of same-sex erotic activity. Paul simply assumes that his readers will share his conviction that those who indulge in homosexual activity are “wrongdoers” (adikoi, literally “unrighteous”), along with other sorts of offenders in his list." (Homosexuality: Rebellion Against God

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

"Show me where the early church murdered ONE "gay."

How about St. Augustine of Hippo..."[T]hose shameful acts against nature, such as were committed in Sodom, ought everywhere and always to be detested and punished. If all nations were to do such things, they would be held guilty of the same crime by the law of God, which has not made men so that they should use one another in this way."(St. Augustine of Hippo, 'Confessions', Book III, Chapter 8, 15.)

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

"Please show me one instance where Jesus put a homosexual to death.

We are told in Hebrews 13:8 that Jesus is the same yesterday and today and forever. So, God Himself destroys Sodom and Gomorrah because of immorality.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

Only the wicked would refer to the Bible as "hate" speech...you are of the devil.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

Well, by your own words you have damned yourself as someone who's anti-American, but I wonder if you'll ever answer my question...how does writing letters make you pro-life...in 33 years, how many abortions have you stopped...how many death camps are shut down? Your pacifism, or so-called non-violence is a cope out because you are tolerant and accepting of evil.

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

"If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?" --Hewbrews 10:26-29

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

"You know Jesus did not preach it. The apostles did not preach it. Jesus did not practice it. The apostles did not practice it. And for the last 2000 years, the church has not practiced it." This is as erroneous as your challenge to me that I couldn't cite Jefferson or any law in the United states to such effect...now you want to boldly open yourself up...giving my over 2,000 years? Ask...and you shalle receive, but since we've learned that it was you who is "anti-American" ...can we call you anti-Christian after this stage?

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

Why don't you try John Calvin & Calvinism...

Martin Luther identifies the sin of Sodom with homosexuality. Commenting on Genesis 19:4-5, he writes "I for my part do not enjoy dealing with this passage, because so far the ears of the Germans are innocent of and uncontaminated by this monstrous depravity; for even though disgrace, like other sins, has crept in through an ungodly soldier and a lewd merchant, still the rest of the people are unaware of what is being done in secret. The Carthusian monks deserve to be hated because they were the first to bring this terrible pollution into Germany from the monasteries of Italy". 19 In the same section of the Genesis lecturers, Luther refers to "the heinous conduct of the people of Sodom " as "extraordinary, inasmuch as they departed from the natural passion and longing of the male for the female, which is implanted into nature by God, and desired what is altogether contrary to nature. Whence comes this perversity? Undoubtedly from Satan, who after people have once turned away from the fear of God, so powerfully suppresses nature that he blots out the natural desire and stirs up a desire that is contrary to nature."

[Mr. Brightside]

Save your breath. I asked for proof that Jesus, the apostles or the early Christian church killed homosexuals.

You have provided no proof of that.

My claim still stands.

This is YOUR DOCTRINE. Not a doctrine of the Christian church.

[Mr. Brightside]

He raised the whole issue of Eric Rudolph...but I'm no pacifist and I never will be in this day and age.

So was Eric Rudolph justified in bombing abortion clinics and gay bars?

[winker]

DOH!!! Read the Article and figure it out!