Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palm Beach woman sues Walgreens over insulting comments on prescription
South Florida Sun-Sentinel ^ | March 8 2006 | Missy Stoddard

Posted on 03/08/2006 2:30:35 PM PST by indcons

For years, Janey Karp has battled depression and anxiety with the help of prescription drugs. Though millions of Americans do the same, Karp admits she is intensely private and can't help but feel stigmatized for needing medication to feel normal.

So when the 53-year-old Palm Beach resident read the Walgreens printout attached to her prescription last week for the sleep aid Ambien, she couldn't believe her eyes. Typed in a field reserved for patient information and dated March 17, 2005, was "CrAzY!!" In another field, dated Sept. 30, 2004, it read: "She's really a psycho!!! Do not say her name too loud, never mention her meds by names & try to talk to her when ... " The information continued onto another page but was not attached.

"I was devastated, humiliated and embarrassed," Karp said. "I honestly couldn't speak. I was trembling."

Karp filed suit Tuesday against Illinois-based Walgreen Co., accusing the nationwide retail chain of defamation, negligent supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Walgreens is investigating, according to company spokeswoman Carol Hively, who said that computers are accessible to pharmacists and pharmacy technicians.

(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: blamingthevictim; floriduh; hipaa; imjustcrazy; lawsuit; pharmacy; prescriptions; walgreen; walgreens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: f150driver
I believe the fine for disclosing information is $10,000 per incident.

They disclosed their opinion that she is a crazy psycho. And they only disclosed it to her!

I don't think that's really against the law.

21 posted on 03/08/2006 2:39:24 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: f150driver

What did they disclose? And to who?


22 posted on 03/08/2006 2:40:07 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dman4384

Hmm....good point...got to think about that one. You may be right though.


23 posted on 03/08/2006 2:40:09 PM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dman4384

Exactly, I thought the same thing.


24 posted on 03/08/2006 2:41:01 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: indcons

25 posted on 03/08/2006 2:41:38 PM PST by SIDENET (If those lame Imams can issue fatwas, then so can I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

me three!


26 posted on 03/08/2006 2:41:39 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
Absolutely. And she is a typical lib too.

Not to be needlessly argumentative... but: I see nothing in the entire article, linked above, giving any reliable sort of indicator whatsoever re: her political leanings, likely or otherwise.

The article does state she's spent the past two years battling various dependencies... but, if that's all it takes: then George Jones must have been "a typical lib," as well. (... and let's not even discuss Rush's self-confessed former Oxy abuse problem, for that matter...)

27 posted on 03/08/2006 2:42:33 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

Don't think so. They didn't disclose this to the *public*. They disclosed it to her. On accident, I'm sure. What, now, Walgreens should pay cause their employees thought her to be nuts and jotted down customer comments in order to better serve he (ie, don't feed the neurosis) ? I say she owes them.


28 posted on 03/08/2006 2:42:47 PM PST by farlander (Strategery - sure beats liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indcons
It appears to me that she really is "CrAzY!!" and that "she's really a psycho!!!"
29 posted on 03/08/2006 2:43:35 PM PST by Jaysun (The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Proud

If anything, the store should be punished at a local level. Maybe something like a $5000 gift certificate for THAT store. But a multi million dollar lawsuit against Walgreens corporation is ridiculous ! (I can picture the Breck Girl fighting this woman's case..)


30 posted on 03/08/2006 2:43:44 PM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Walgreens may get into real trouble for this incident.

And well they should. They should also thank their lucky stars that this didn't result in her attempting to commit a successful suicide.

31 posted on 03/08/2006 2:44:56 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (When in doubt, I ask myself: "What would Jack Bauer do?" My boss isn't going to like the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that "they" aren't out to get you.


32 posted on 03/08/2006 2:45:52 PM PST by weegee ("Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but Democrats believe every day is April 15.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
Money, money, money, m-o-n-e-y. She's just crazy for money. On the local news this evening is a woman suing because she had a girl instead of the boy she was told she would have based on an ultrasound. Gee, her little girl is sure going to feel wanted if she ever finds out about this.
33 posted on 03/08/2006 2:46:24 PM PST by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dman4384
How can disclosure of patient info to the patient be a violation under HIPAA?

Is it a HIPAA violation to give information about a patient's multiple personality disorder to the wrong personality?

34 posted on 03/08/2006 2:47:18 PM PST by KarlInOhio (The tree of liberty is getting awfully parched.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: indcons

As a follow up to my prior post, Tort reform is the answer to what is surely going to happen.


35 posted on 03/08/2006 2:47:20 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (When in doubt, I ask myself: "What would Jack Bauer do?" My boss isn't going to like the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Lawyers want cash. They don't want half of a $5,000 gift certificate.


36 posted on 03/08/2006 2:48:14 PM PST by weegee ("Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but Democrats believe every day is April 15.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: indcons

I was once married to one like this. This woman will never turn this loose and, even after it's settled, she'll find a way to sue the lawyer who represents her. It goes on forever. I know. I've been divorced from mine since 1994 and I still hear about the people who have offended her and how she's going to get them. She went through 3 lawyers during our divorce because the lawyers kept firing her as a client. These medications are a dangerous balancing act.


37 posted on 03/08/2006 2:49:30 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Proud

There is no cause for a law suit IMO. She didn't lose a dime. Further, based on her reaction to the note, has proven the note writers correct. At best she should get an apology for their bad manners. Nothing more.


38 posted on 03/08/2006 2:50:09 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Proud

"I'm normally on the side agaist lawsuits, but this one is so deserved."

While I agree with your sentiment, I can never feel good about these kinds of lawsuits. Because she was embarrased or got her feelings hurt is no reason to award her some huge settlement, which is certainly where this is headed. I write internal notes all the time. If I enter them in the wrong field, the customer will be able to see them on reports. Luckily, I haven't been sued yet for typing in the wrong field.

Whatever happened to going to the owner/manager, throwing a fit and refusing to ever do business with them again while telling your story to everyone who will listen? Do I get a million everytime some moron in some business wrongs me? I am growing to hate our sue-happy society.


39 posted on 03/08/2006 2:50:26 PM PST by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: indcons

I don't think the customer had any right to reveal the private comments made by the Walgreen's employees. Perhaps they can sue her!


40 posted on 03/08/2006 2:50:42 PM PST by TravisBickle (A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. ~ Winston S. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson