Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Great Britain: Fury at Churchill statue (Former PM and beloved hero is in a straightjacket)
The Sun (U.K.) ^ | March 11, 2006 | JOHN TROUP

Posted on 03/11/2006 12:30:59 PM PST by Stoat

Fury at Churchill statue

Storm ... statue has provoked fury
Storm ... statue has provoked fury
 
 

By JOHN TROUP

 THE family of war hero Winston Churchill yesterday slammed a statue of him in a STRAITJACKET.

MP Nicholas Soames — his grandson — said: “It’s not only insulting, it’s pathetic.”

Churchill is known to have suffered periods of depression which he called his “black dog”.

And the charity Rethink put the lifesize statue on display in Norwich yesterday to symbolise how the mentally ill are stigmatised by society.

But Mr Soames said: “This is probably a good cause in search of publicity and they have let some idiot ruin their case.


 

Inspiring ... Sir Winston
Inspiring ... Sir Winston
Picture: REUTERS
 

“It is grossly offensive to Sir Winston and his millions of admirers.”

And World War II veteran Captain John Nunnely MBE, 83, said: “I am appalled to think that the 20th century’s greatest leader is being treated like this.”

Churchill’s family objected to the statue when it was planned.
 

But the charity went ahead anyway. A spokeswoman said: “Churchill was a great leader and this is an illustration of what people with mental illness can achieve.”

But one visitor to Norwich’s Forum centre said: “It’s wrong. Winston was a great man, whatever his mental problems were.”

 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: art; britain; churchill; england; greatbritain; history; milhistory; statue; straightjacket; uk; unitedkingdom; winstonchurchill; ww2
Sky News No Rethink Over Churchill Statue
 
The Churchill statue
The Churchill statue

Churchill Statue Backed

Updated: 10:39, Saturday March 11, 2006

 

A mental health charity has defended its decision to create a statue of Winston Churchill wearing a straitjacket.

The statue of Churchill, who suffered from depression, was unveiled in the centre of Norwich as part of a continuing campaign by the charity Rethink.

There has been widespread criticism of the statue, with Churchill's grandson, Conservative MP Nicholas Soames, telling The Sun: "It's not only insulting, it's pathetic.

"This is probably a good cause in search of publicity and they have let some idiot ruin their case. It is grossly offensive to Sir Winston and his millions of admirers."

A Rethink spokesman countered: "We believe that destroying the stigma that surrounds mental illness is a matter of national priority.

"We also believe that it is the joint responsibility of the media, Government and the public to achieve this aim, by portraying a more positive image of people with mental illness."

Rethink said Churchill was chosen because, despite depression, he was able to become Prime Minister and lead Britain to victory in the Second World War.

The charity said it wanted the statue to illustrate how discrimination surrounding depression and other mental illness acted like a straitjacket on sufferers.

Rethink said it had decided to focus its latest campaign on Norwich because there were more anti-depressant drugs prescribed in the city than anywhere else in central or eastern England.

Norwich also has a higher suicide rate than the national average and a higher rate of people self harming.

Rethink director of campaigns Paul Corry added:"We did not intend the statue to be offensive in any way.

"The message we want to portray is that it is possible to recover from mental illness and overcome it and be successful - because Churchill is an example of someone who was able to do that."

 
 

 

 

1 posted on 03/11/2006 12:31:06 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The organizers of "Rethink" should consider their name v..e..r..y carefully, and then do so....

What complete "maroons".


2 posted on 03/11/2006 12:36:46 PM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TPartyType; snugs

W.Churchill ping.


3 posted on 03/11/2006 12:47:48 PM PST by Majie Purple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

The point these idiots miss is Churchill battled his shortcomings in private. He did not become a "victim", along with accompanying sense of entitlement that these sort of organizations endorse.


4 posted on 03/11/2006 12:48:45 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
The organizers of "Rethink" should consider their name v..e..r..y carefully, and then do so....

What complete "maroons".

Aside from the obvious insult to Sir Winston, his family and to those who know even the most minimal aspects of the history of Great Britain, I'm astonished that such a project as this has been allowed to come to completion.  To commission and publicly place a large statue is extremely expensive, and before doing so one assumes that this organization did some minimal bit of research which suggested that the design would further their goals.  I can't believe that needlessly offending millions, perhaps billions of people would be a positive thing to do for any organization.

5 posted on 03/11/2006 12:49:52 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Purple Mountains Maj

Just don't say anything against muslims, jews or arabs and you are fine.


6 posted on 03/11/2006 12:50:44 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

It is truly ugly. Every time this kind of thing happens I kerep hoping the welfare addled masses of England will wake up.

If a high percentage of people are on anti-depressants then there's something wrong with the government that is handing them out. This would put ME on anti-depressants.

and I'm just Susy Sunshine.


7 posted on 03/11/2006 12:53:02 PM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

"Just don't say anything against muslims, jews or arabs and you are fine."

Please explain why this was posted to me? I don't understand why...


8 posted on 03/11/2006 12:53:13 PM PST by Majie Purple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The Communists have always hated Churchill -- wonder if there is some connection.


9 posted on 03/11/2006 12:53:38 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

kerep=keep

Maybe I need anti-dyslexic medication.


10 posted on 03/11/2006 12:53:42 PM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle
The point these idiots miss is Churchill battled his shortcomings in private. He did not become a "victim", along with accompanying sense of entitlement that these sort of organizations endorse.

Exactly, and to the best of my knowledge he was never so badly afflicted that he actually required a straightjacket or institutional commitment.  It grossly overstates the severity of his condition..

11 posted on 03/11/2006 12:53:53 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

guess the nazi/commie supporters have come out of the woodwork and into the open!


12 posted on 03/11/2006 12:54:51 PM PST by madtier1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
to the best of my knowledge he was never so badly afflicted that he actually required a straightjacket

Of course not.

13 posted on 03/11/2006 1:12:40 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

In short, he coped.


14 posted on 03/11/2006 1:26:02 PM PST by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: madtier1

?


15 posted on 03/11/2006 1:46:21 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

Percentage wise I would assume similar to America.


16 posted on 03/11/2006 1:48:05 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Just let them make one of Mohammed in a strait jacket and
see how long they last.


17 posted on 03/11/2006 2:09:59 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; MadIvan

Ivan grab a lorry and go run the damn thing over...destroy it.


18 posted on 03/11/2006 2:38:50 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
American left-wingers refused to put Franklin Roosevelt in a wheelchair statue for his memorial. Some disability groups complained, but the Left didn't care about the complaints, or the truth, they wanted a phony statue of their hero. So it goes.
19 posted on 03/11/2006 2:56:40 PM PST by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

OMG-- What is the meaning of this?!


20 posted on 03/11/2006 2:59:40 PM PST by Fudd Fan (GET OFF THE THREAD YOU BIG DOPE! (I'm so Levinitized!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
A mental health charity has defended its decision to create a statue of Winston Churchill wearing a straitjacket.

They're sick in the head.

21 posted on 03/11/2006 3:02:25 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I remember reading a few years back that British high schoolers new very little about their history, including Churchill's role.

We don't have a monopoly on historical idiots.

22 posted on 03/11/2006 3:08:30 PM PST by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Just let them make one of Mohammed in a strait jacket and
see how long they last.

A "Mohammed in a straitjacket" statue would of course be a delightful addition to the cultural and civic landscape, and one that I would be proud to support in a pecuniary sense.  Not only would it be a far more accurate depiction of it's subject than the hideous insult that is the subject of this thread but it would also show the Religion of Peace in all it's glory.  The massive riots, destruction and mass-murder that would be unleashed from the "Islamic World" would make the Cartoon Jihad look like child's play.  Anyone still not convinced of the utterly dysfunctional nature of Islam at it's core would be quickly educated.

23 posted on 03/11/2006 5:39:16 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Ivan grab a lorry and go run the damn thing over...destroy it.

I would be delighted to assist with the legal procurement of such a vehicle...civic renovation in this context is a truly worthy cause that I would be proud to support.

 


24 posted on 03/11/2006 5:45:36 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TimSkalaBim
American left-wingers refused to put Franklin Roosevelt in a wheelchair statue for his memorial. Some disability groups complained, but the Left didn't care about the complaints, or the truth, they wanted a phony statue of their hero. So it goes.

I see your point but I would suggest that it could also be argued that there was simply an interest in protecting his dignity and his privacy in the matter of Roosevelt's very real condition.

In this case, they are taking what was most likely a comparatively minor affliction of a man far more deserving of respect than most others in the entire 20th century and magnifying it beyond anything even vaguely resembling the truth....they are fabricating a lie that will be looked upon by schoolchildren and those not familiar with history as a truthful depiction of how Churchill really was..

It is a crime against Sir Winston's memory, his family, the entire Nation of Great Britain and all of Western culture, as we are all perpetually indebted to Sir Winston Churchill.

25 posted on 03/11/2006 5:54:07 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
A mental health charity has defended its decision to create a statue of Winston Churchill wearing a straitjacket.

They're sick in the head.

And they insist that everyone else in the world be insulted by their sickness.

26 posted on 03/11/2006 5:57:05 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree; Liz; Joe 6-pack; woofie; vannrox; giotto; iceskater; Conspiracy Guy; Dolphy; ...

Art ping.

Let Sam Cree, Woofie, or me know if you want on or off this art ping list.

I think this is a travesty and a lie. It is an example of the left twisting the truth for political benefit, something that is happening more and more in this world. What is appalling is that the left doesn't even realize the lie.

It would be one thing if Churchill had ever been so restrained in a strait jacket. This is one case of destroying art that I might even favor.


27 posted on 03/12/2006 5:46:16 PM PST by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

The most annoying thing about dadaism, is that it works.


28 posted on 03/12/2006 5:50:31 PM PST by patton (Just because you don't understand it, does not mean that it does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Sometimes, I wish I knew how to "modify" certain sites.


29 posted on 03/12/2006 6:03:43 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

My definition of Dada is irrational art from WWI. Maybe you have a different definition. This work of Churchill is just another way to "decontexturalize" (to dethrone and mock) a great hero.

Melt it down.


30 posted on 03/12/2006 6:14:47 PM PST by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor
the purpose of dadaism was to evoke emotion - mainly anger. The tragedy of it is that it works.

exactly like this statue.

31 posted on 03/12/2006 6:18:04 PM PST by patton (Just because you don't understand it, does not mean that it does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Churchhill did not have a mental disease. But the people who had this statue made do.
32 posted on 03/12/2006 6:22:53 PM PST by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Interesting word: Da·da or da·da

n : A European artistic and literary movement (1916-1923) that flouted conventional aesthetic and cultural values by producing works marked by nonsense, travesty, and incongruity.

n : a nihilistic art movement (especially in painting) that flourished in Europe early in the 20th century; based on irrationality and negation of the accepted laws of beauty


33 posted on 03/12/2006 6:23:20 PM PST by celestine phophesy (One who asks a question is a fool for 5 min; one who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Sir Winston was, for a public figure, a very private man. I am wondering if the organizers ever thought that they were exploiting him in a way that would have humiliated him (and frankly if they put up a statue of me in a straight-jacket, it would humiliate me.)

McVey


34 posted on 03/12/2006 7:30:35 PM PST by mcvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

This is also pointing to what the left is willing to do to advance an agenda. If someone is useful, even if by distortation and by violating the most basic sense of common decency, they use them.

McVey


35 posted on 03/12/2006 7:32:26 PM PST by mcvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Once we turn individuals into tools, we have returned to ages far darker than we have ever known.


36 posted on 03/12/2006 7:33:20 PM PST by mcvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Until this moment I never really gauged the left's cruelty or recklessness. They have done enough. Have they no sense of decency?

A paraphrase of course.

McVey


37 posted on 03/12/2006 7:36:27 PM PST by mcvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

"Just don't say anything against muslims, jews or arabs and you are fine." I ask again...Explain what you mean...And why do you address me with this question...Don't recoil...Back it up with a response please. You don't know me and I don't know you,PLEASE BE BIG ENOUGH TO EXPLAIN YOUR STATEMENT.Drive by comment shootings are so childish...


38 posted on 03/12/2006 9:36:12 PM PST by Majie Purple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Sometimes, I wish I knew how to "modify" certain sites.

Well, it appears that one popular method is to get a giant, industrial-sized backhoe and attach a huge iron ball to it via a chain.  Raising the backhoe's bucket causes the ball to rise above the ground, and thereby becomes a delightfully effective instrument of semi-controlled mayhem, suitable for all manner of civic renovation including the removal of insulting statues.

I'm certain that your local neighborhood backhoe dealer can put you in touch with the appropriate licensing and certification agencies that will get you squared away as a legal wrecking ball operator in no time.  :-)

 

39 posted on 03/13/2006 12:02:28 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Apparently the so called "Brains" in this nutty operation are suffering greatly from some sort of terrible mental illness themselves.


40 posted on 03/13/2006 12:11:14 AM PST by Boiler Plate (Mom always said why be difficult, when with just a little more effort you can be impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
Churchhill did not have a mental disease. But the people who had this statue made do.

At the very least it sounds as though they are suffering from an acute case of uncontrolled historical revisionism syndrome and perhaps the condition is exacerbated by delusional Marxist tendencies, but a clear diagnosis would require onsite evaluation of the patient (s).   Open-ended civil commitment on the grounds that they constitute a danger to overall public order as well as to the honor of Great Britain is always an option that could be considered.

41 posted on 03/13/2006 12:21:21 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
Apparently the so called "Brains" in this nutty operation are suffering greatly from some sort of terrible mental illness themselves.

Agreed.  Please see my post # 41.  :-)

42 posted on 03/13/2006 12:23:30 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

IMO, this sculpture is perfectly congruent with one of the major thrusts of modern art: do something shocking and hope it generates plenty of attention.

Go for the moment, don't worry about the future. Pursue trendiness, forget about creating something timeless.

All the better if it gives the "artist" an opportunity to look down his nose at the bourgeoisie, the middle class, while simultaneously sucking up to and despising his truly wealthy patrons.

These kind of artists think they are so noble, deep and spiritual, but the whole charade is mighty shallow.


43 posted on 03/13/2006 7:27:00 AM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TPartyType

Here’s one of the Threads it happened on...I searched using keywords Winston Churchill. I told You it was happening my real life Brother!Read the entire thing...comments & all...You’ll see.


44 posted on 05/14/2007 12:55:15 PM PDT by Majie Purple (How do I fill out the tag line anyway? Blasted HTML Code!... Teeheehee! HAhahaha! LOL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle

Well, I was going to add something, but it seems as though you’ve summed it up rather nicely.


45 posted on 01/26/2008 5:26:00 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson